This post was first published 10 years ago, in the midst of the Great Recession.  I continue to think about the real challenges of running a small business and the balance needed between simplicity for the business owner and protections for the public.  More below.

Senator McCain this morning on Meet the Press reprised the Republican view of the approach to stimulus:  tax cuts for small businesses.

I thought about the small businesses I had seen in the past couple of weeks.  Not one of them was paying income taxes, and their expenditure on payroll taxes was small, because they’d cut back on  employees.

For the very small business, I don’t see taxes as the culprit.

Everywhere you look you see the impact of credit cards on the economy.  Often it’s suit by American Express that brings a small business owner to my office.

Or the businessman makes a list of their credit card debt and the interest rates after the recent round of increases and realize that they can never pay off the debt at 28% interest.

Credit card merchant fees are a much bigger piece of the small business expense picture than are taxes for most of my clients.  Each merchant pays a percentage of each credit transaction to the card issuer.   7-Eleven store owners are petitioning  Congress for regulation of the fees charged merchants  by the card issuers .

I’m certainly not an economist and don’t have a Moran Plan for reinvigorating the economy, but the people I see in trouble aren’t there because of their tax burden.

Small business wish list

Ten years later, my wish list for entrepreneurs is greater simplicity on the administrative side of the business.

Perhaps fewer jurisdictions to deal with and regulations that the average Joe can understand and follow.  Less need for hired professionals to keep the business out of trouble.

Looking around in 2019, the regulatory changes we’re seeing don’t seem to be helping Mom and Pop businesses.

More

Pitfalls to avoid for small business

Your money needs a prenup

Myth of the business credit card

Even in a world where people attempt almost any skilled task with the help of Google, YouTube, or Legal Zoom,  people continue to ask: is this contract legal?

They aren’t asking (usually) whether the subject matter of the contract is permitted by law.

They really want to know: will what I’ve written be enforceable.

What makes it a contract

There are no magic words or phrases that make a contract enforceable by a court.

Enforceability is not acquired by adding “whereas” or “notwithstanding“.

A contract need only establish that one party made a promise to the other for consideration. Consideration is legalese for money.  Or something else of value.

If I promise to join you for dinner next Friday, we have not created an enforceable contract, because there was no valuable consideration exchanged.  My promise was gratuitious.  You didn’t offer me anything but your good company over a meal.

If , on the other hand, I promise to speak at the event you’re planning, for which you’ll pay my  fee, then we have an enforceable contract.  I will appear and speak, and you will pay.

If either of us fails to do what we’ve promised, a court will attempt to give the injured party the benefit of the bargain.

So here are four tips on drafting a contract that does the job.

1.  Write out the entire deal

The biggest failing of DIY contracts is incompleteness.  They don’t describe fully the performance that is promised.  They miss one of the essential terms:

• who
• what
• where
• when

If you hope that a judge will enforce a contract, it has to be written such that an absolute stranger to the deal, the judge, can read the contract and know what was agreed.

Too many self-drafted contracts don’t contain enough for a stranger to understand the deal.

Now, contracts with missing terms or ambiguities can be enforced.  The contract is still “legal”.  It’s just that there is a great risk that the missing terms as the judge fills them in don’t match the intent of the parties.

Enforcement of a fragmentary contract is far more expensive than had the contract been complete.

Enforcement of the unwritten terms becomes victim to what each party remembers but didn’t write down.

2. Flush out & write down assumptions

Often, the contracting parties each come to the table with a collection of assumptions about the arrangement.  And each party assumes that the other party shares their assumptions.

Only, until you articulate your assumptions, you can’t test whether you are both, really, on the same track.

The unwritten assumptions form part of the deal.  A good contract lays the assumption out on paper.  If they aren’t shared when you sit down to write the contract,  discussion or negotiation ensues.

The exercise of writing it out becomes as important as the writing itself.

3.  Explore the “what ifs”

Well crafted contracts provide for the rights of the parties if things don’t go just as hoped when the contract was formed.

What if

• one party gets sick and performance is delayed
• the materials aren’t available on schedule
• the product doesn’t perform as anticipated

My rule of thumb is that the more money that is involved, or the more critical the contract is to your business, the more what ifs the contract should address.

If the consideration is $1000, it’s not worth extended negotiating or drafting to deal with remote possibilities.  If it’s a $100,000, it’s worth more to lay out the details.

4.  Provide for attorney’s fees

If you expect to enforce the contract in court if it’s breached, then your contract should provide that the injured party can collect its attorneys fees from the other in addition to any other damages.

Why?

Because the American Rule about attorneys fees says that each party pays their own attorney, win or lose.  That is, unless the contract, or a statute, says differently.

Without a provision that grants the prevailing party the attorneys fees necessary to enforce the contract, it may simply be too expensive to go to court.  Or, the cost of representation may consume the damage award.

Write on

With these principles in mind, you can draft a contract that is certain and enforceable.  Strive for clarity and completeness.

And if this seem too daunting, take your draft to an attorney and pay only for review and repair of your document.

Because, at the end of the day, a contract only works if you can enforce it.

More

How you sign your name to your corporation’s contract

Benefits of incorporating not what you think

Does your business partnership have a prenup?

Image courtesy of Pixabay and Nemo.

Facets on a gem bend light and change how we see things.

The same thing happens when bankruptcy law encounters a small business owner and the business itself.

Seen from one angle of the law, the business is a valuable asset.

Seen from another, it is nothing more than a job for the owner, having no real value without the owner.

It depends on where you stand and where the light hits.

Is incorporating dangerous?

The question comes up when individuals have a small business that provides a living, but the owners have accumulated crushing debt.

I wrote earlier about how incorporation could create a separate legal entity that could continue to operate during the bankruptcy of its shareholders.

My good friend Doug Jacobs pointed out that under some circumstances, incorporation could be seen as a fraudulent transfer.  And that’s not good.

A fraudulent transfer is one where the entity conveying property either intends to put it beyond the reach of his creditors, or, receives less than the asset was worth in exchange, leaving the transferor less able to pay his debts.

The bankruptcy code allows the bankruptcy trustee to recapture assets transferred in fraud of creditors.

My counter argument to Doug’s point is that incorporation hardly conveys away the value of the business, as the debtor simply exchanges his outright ownership of the business for outright ownership of the stock in the corporation that owns the business.

If there is real value there, a bankruptcy trustee can reach it by dissolving the corporation.

My second argument is that before incorporation, the business was indistinguishable from the individual. The idea of “transferring” debts to the newly created corporation is facially pleasing, but cannot relieve the individual of any liability he had before incorporation.

It is an axiom of law that no agreement between two entities can bind a third: that is, the individual and his corporation cannot by agreement cut off the right of the individual’s creditor to look to the individual for repayment, even though the new corporation and the individual might agree that the corporation will be henceforth liable.

This analysis is probably more theoretical than real.

The small businesses my clients usually operate are little more than personal services businesses. Incorporation simply provides cover for the trustee who, because of incorporation, doesn’t have to shut the business down as part of his duties to preserve the assets of the estate.

Law colored by local culture

But whether you see incorporation representing a meaningful transfer or not, the issue highlights the fact that the legal culture does vary from place to place.

I practice in Silicon Valley; Doug practices in the Central Valley. Like it or not, even though the law is the same in both places, judges often bring a slightly different perspective to the bench, depending on where they practice.

For that reason, when you select a bankruptcy lawyer, you want one who knows the judges before whom your case will be heard and understands the legal culture in that community.

Image:  Nemo & Pixabay

Financial partnerships are at least as challenging as marriages.  And business deals don’t have love to smooth the rough spots in the relationship.

The traditional marriage service ends with the charge that what God has joined together,  let no man put asunder.

That’s great with love, but not so great with money.

Something will likely asunder the business venture.

Yet people pool their money in business, real estate, and investments without a thought to how the partnership will end.

Chances are, it will end, and that end can be very messy and miserably expensive.

My charge to those pairing up for an investment is this:

At the start of any venture involving pooling money, lay out some rules for how you part in the end.

Think of your business wind-up rules as a prenuptial agreement for your business. [Read more…]

It isn’t just marriage that can get you roped in to a bankruptcy case that isn’t your own.

Own community property and a bankruptcy filing by your spouse or your soon-to-be ex can drag you into a bankruptcy court.

But the issue is broader:  joint ownership of any kind of asset in any state, community property or not,  exposes you to a loss of control of your property if your co owner files bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy court has the power to force the sale your property or require you to buy out your co owner.  On a timeline not of your choosing.

Co owners at risk

If your partner in a business or a piece of real property files bankruptcy, the partner’s interest may be sold for the benefit of your partner’s creditors.

Oops!

And since the sale price of just your partner’s interest in the property would probably be less than the fraction of the partner’s ownership, the Bankruptcy Code gives the bankruptcy trustee the power to sell your interest too. [Read more…]