Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

Collection Suits and Court Dates

By

glasses-983947_1280_opt

Those in financial difficulty are frequently not operating at their peak.  I know that.

But for the life of me, I can’t understand how the recipient of a summons and complaint from a California court can read the papers and absorb only that they have a “court date”.

Arghhh!

How California lawsuit works

The basic outline of a law suit is that the creditor files a complaint with the court. The court issues its summons, which validates the complaint and puts the defendant on notice that there is a legal suit pending.

The summons tells the person served plainly that they must file a typewritten answer to the complaint within 30 days of service.  Fail to file an answer and the other side may get a judgment for the relief prayed for, which is usually money.

Served along with the complaint is a notice of case management conference on a given date.  The CMC is well after the date on which the answer is due.

At the case management conference, assuming that an answer has been filed, the court will set deadlines, trial dates, etc.

But none of this scheduling is necessary if the defendant has not contested the complaint by filing an answer.

You must answer

Why is it that a consumer debtor grasps only the date of the case management conference, and absorbs none of the rest of the message that says clearly, in two syllable words, that one must file an answer for there to be anything for a court to decide?

Stress MAKES you stupid

I should have a cassette tape to play to tell clients that the case management conference date is meaningless if you didn’t file an answer.

If you don’t have a defense to the action, that’s fine.  If you agree that you owe the amount of money shown in the prayer of the complaint, there may be no need for an answer and a defense.

Just don’t obsess about a date that means nothing if you didn’t take the time to read the summons and understand that filing an answer is the price of admission to the courthouse.

Lawsuit is a wake-up call

Often, the filing of a lawsuit is just the most dramatic evidence that your finances are scrambled.

Consider whether you spend your energies fighting this one action, or whether you need a more global remedy like bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy and the alternatives

Image courtesy of Pixabay.

Why Even Rock Solid Marriages Need A Prenuptial Agreement

By

ring-260892_1280_optPre nuptial agreements aren’t just for the rich or  mid-life marriages.

In California, pre nuptial agreements do far more than provide a blueprint for division of property at divorce.

A prenup can earn its keep for decades in marriages where divorce never enters the picture.

Why?

It protects the assets of the marriage from outsiders.

A prenup can limit what assets the creditors of one spouse can reach to satisfy a debt.  Let’s see how that works.

What’s a prenup

A prenuptial agreement is a contract between two parties, made prior to their marriage, that controls the ownership, management, and division upon divorce, of their assets and income.

After the divorce case of San Francisco Giants Barry Bonds testing his prenuptial agreement that denied his wife any part of his earnings during marriage, California prenups must meet a series of tests designed to make sure that the agreement was made knowingly and preferably with advice from a lawyer.

The California Supreme Court upheld the Bonds prenup, even though the wife had no lawyer, was disadvantaged by the agreement and had it popped on her on the eve of the wedding. That decision sparked changes to the law  to make more certain that both parties understood the arrangement and its consequences.

My interest as a bankruptcy lawyer in prenups is rooted in how a pre nup works during the marriage.

A prenup’s value lies in overriding the California  presumption that everything acquired during marriage is community property.

Community property is vulnerable

Community property is liable for the debts of either spouse incurred during the marriage.

Any debt.  Whether the other spouse knows about it or not.

Worse, the community property is liable for the debts of either spouse that they incurred before marriage.

In the absence of an enforceable agreement, California law makes everything acquired during marriage community property, including the wages of each spouse.

The result is that one spouse can find their wages garnished to pay a judgment their mate without any involvement from the spouse whose wages are garnished.  Ouch.

Cut exposure in half

Too often, the full ramifications of community property and the claims of creditors aren’t obvious until a business deal goes bad, or there’s a horrific accident, or the student loan collectors come round.

Then spouses see that everything they’ve acquired and their income going forward is liable to pay a crushing debt. Or at risk in a bankruptcy.

When giving isn’t a virtue

And often it’s too late to do anything that’s legally effective to move away from community property.  Post nuptial agreements not to have community property are subject to being invalidated as fraudulent transfers.

Fraudulent transfers include disposing of property without getting equivalent value in return , like giving stuff away.  Fraudulent transfer law also applies when you take actions after a debt is incurred that are intended to make it hard for an existing creditor to collect what he’s owed.

If a transfer is fraudulent, a creditor can invalidate it and reach the assets you were trying to insulate.

So, if you wait to reconsider community property until there’s a real need, it may be too late.

Weighing the risk

If you elect to alter the results of the community property system to limit exposure to creditors, you have to live with the consequences should the marriage dissolve.

A California family court has jurisdiction over the community property of the couple, but not over their separate property.  And separate property is what results by reason of a pre nup.

A family judge could still award family support and can also divide the family home even if held as separate property.  But other acquisitions may be beyond the reach of the family court by reason of how title to the asset is held.

So, a prenup is not without its own risks.

Who said marriage is easy?

California Bankruptcy Law Is All Our Own

By

california bankruptcy law

California Bankruptcy law is a lot like a unicorn….appealing but imaginary.

Instead, we have bankruptcy in California, where the landscape is shaped by community property;  state exemptions, large mortgages, and the 9th circuit court of appeals.

Like the Merced River cutting through the granite of Yosemite, those factors alter the bankruptcy landscape here.

Community property

California community property law defines what assets of a married couple come within the control of the bankruptcy court. While there are other community property states, it is the law of each state that defines how community property is created.  State law also defines the rights of creditors in that community property.

Whether one spouses files, or both join in a bankruptcy case, all of the community is available to the creditors of the marriage.

In return, after the bankruptcy all community property is forever protected by the discharge.   Post bankruptcy wages and purchases are beyond the reach of creditors.

Even when only one spouse files, all the community gets protection from creditors who had claims when the case was filed.

Much different from the treatment of marital property other places.

Two California exemption laws

While bankruptcy is federal law, California state law defines  exemptions.  Exemptions specify assets a debtor can protect from creditors in bankruptcy.

Exemptions are the only place in bankruptcy that the law is explicitly different from state to state.

Congress, in a legislative compromise in 1978 on the adoption of the Bankruptcy Code (back when Congress knew how to compromise), states were given the option to opt out of the federal bankruptcy exemptions in favor of the state’s exemptions.

In response, California’s legislature gave debtors a choice:  the existing state law exemptions found in Code of Civil Procedure 704, or a special set of California bankruptcy exemptions starting at CCP 703.140.

Mortgage debt dominates

California boasts (or suffers) home loan balances that make eyes bug in other states.  The cost of housing here skews family budgets, leaving less for other living expenses.

Why the means test is toothless in the Bay Area

For many years, credit cards were used to fill the gap between the available income and the expectations of comfortable living.

For homeowners, the deduction for mortgage payments on the means test assures most homeowners that they pass the means test.

The increasing cost of renting has sharpened the drive to save a house from foreclosure, at whatever cost.

Bankruptcy can often make that possible in Chapter 13.

9th Circuit shapes us

California bankruptcy judges are bound by the decisions of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  The circuit courts can only be overruled by the Supreme Court.

So, the decisions made by the 9th Circuit on bankruptcy issues drive outcomes that may be different from outcomes in other circuits.

Recently the 9th Circuit made some very satisfying decisions for bankruptcy debtors, including allowing lien stripping in Chapter 20;  granting attorneys fees to debtors who win bankruptcy disputes with their creditors; and slapping down bankruptcy trustees who sought to disqualify Chapter 13 debtors who had secured debts for non essentials.

And, the 9th Circuit rejected its earlier, horrible decision about making debtors whole when creditors violate the automatic stay.

Bankruptcy the product of our environment

So, sorry to disappoint, there is no “California bankruptcy law.”

There’s just the granite of the Bankruptcy Code, fractured, shaped, and worn by the economic and legal realities of California.

And the resulting landscape is generally awesome.

Why Bankruptcy Means Test Is Paper Tiger In Bay Area

By

4530662416_a4ed18bb3b_z (1)

Bankruptcy’s means test is a paper tiger in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Really!

You can see why few Bay Area residents are constrained by the means test when you compare the latest median income figures  used in the means test with the allowed cost of rental housing here.

To review:  Congress  in 2005 tried to write a universal formula to limit bankruptcy relief to those who “needed” it. Bankruptcy judges were to be stripped of discretion in favor of a formula that would be universal.

Those whose average income in the past six months exceeded the median for their state would have to show that they had little more than $200 a month left over after subtracting some standardized allowances for food, clothing and housing and their actual projected expenses for other allowed costs of living.

The cost of housing in the Bay Area stands this formula on its head.

The means test numbers

The means test starts with the median income in the state for a family of each size.  Income numbers and the fixed deductions from income are updated twice a year.

The new numbers become effective for cases filed April 1, 2016 or after.  

Newer numbers don’t change the story

Our survey says, the median income in California for a single person household is $ 50, 579.  Make a dollar more than that and you have to pass the means test to file Chapter 7.

That median income translates to a monthly gross income of $4215 for one person.

How does that work in the Bay Area?

Bankruptcy in San Mateo County

Apply the new cost of housing numbers, and passing the means test is a piece of cake:

The allowed deduction for rent for a single person in San Mateo County is $2508.  Non rent costs of housing like utilities add $461 a month to the cost of putting a roof over your head.

Seventy percent of a median income single worker’s gross income goes to housing! Most financial advisors target 31-35% of gross income for the cost of housing.

A single person in San Mateo County would have to gross nearly $9000 a month before their housing expenses were only one third of their gross monthly income.

Since the numbers vary by the size of the family, let’s look at a hypothetical  family of four in San Mateo County.

Median income for a family of four in California is $81,837, or $6820 a month, before taxes and other deductions.

Rent in San Mateo County for those four people is $3462, with an additional $636 in additional housing expense.

Our median income family is paying 53% of their gross income for housing.  They’d have to gross $12,418  before the allowed cost of housing was only one third of their income.

With slight variations, the result is the same for all Bay Area counties.

What the numbers mean for Bay Area debtors

It’s no news that it costs a lot to live in the Bay Area.

After you’ve put a roof over your head, there isn’t a lot left for all the other things that you need, like food, transportation and health care.  All of those things are deductible on the means test as well.

Not to mention reserves for the unexpected, savings for college, and provision for retirement.

So, if you are servicing credit card debt, you are probably spending money on long ago purchases that is desperately needed  for current expenses.

Know that the means test is not likely to bar you from bankruptcy.

Only you know what is keeping you from a fresh start.

More about deciding about debt

Alternatives to bankruptcy

What holds you back

Bankruptcy makes the future better

Image:  licensed under Creative Commons license by Cucchiaio

Updated with April, 2016 numbers.

California Garnishment Now Provides Greater Protection Of Wages

By

california garnishment lawWorkers making close to the California minimum wage got additional protection from wage garnishments under a change in the law effective in 2013.

With the annual increases in the state minimum wage, in 2019 California law now protects an employee’s weekly net wages up to 40 times the state minimum wage, currently $11 to $12 per hour.

The prior formula  limiting a judgment creditor to 25% of a debtor’s after tax wages remains.  But the amended law caps a wage garnishment at the lesser of the two calculations.

A judgment creditor isn’t absolutely entitled to the amount figured under these formulas, however.

If the judgment being collected is for a debt other than support, a judgment debtor can seek a reduction in the amount of the  garnishment from each paycheck to the extent necessary for his support.  CCP 706.051.

Garnished-now what?

The only run of the mill creditor who can garnish your wages is a creditor who has already sued you and won a judgment.  That judgment entitles the creditor to levy bank accounts and garnish wages for 10 years or until the judgment is paid in full.  More about judgments.

The judgment accrues interest at 10% simple interest per year.

Two questions arise:

1.  Can you meet your current living expenses on the money left after a garnishment?

2.  Is this judgment just one part of a bigger debt problem?

The dangers of doing nothing are greater than just the other bills that don’t get paid while your wages are garnished.

Too often, the reduction in available cash puts your car or housing payments in jeopardy.  And, it probably pays a debt that is dischargeable in bankruptcy, as most unsecured debts are, while non dischargeable debts like taxes, student loans or child support go unpaid.

Here are some ideas on who to pay with the money remaining.

Your wage garnishment action items

See an experienced bankruptcy lawyer.  You want to know two things.

  • Can you petition the state court for a smaller garnishment? and,
  • Does bankruptcy make sense in light of the bigger picture of your income and expenses?

A bankruptcy will stop a wage garnishment. And, you may be able to recover the money taken from your check from the creditor as a preference.

If bankruptcy is an appropriate response, there is no point in paying the judgment creditor for another pay period.  Pick up the phone and get some advice.

More

How to interview a bankruptcy lawyer

Wage garnishment survival guide

   Bankruptcy’s effect on judgments

Does Marriage Make Me Liable For My Spouse’s Debts

By

Liability of community property in California

Countless times, a client announces that he won’t marry the love of his life until he’s fixed his debt problems.

Noble thought, but unnecessary in California.  Even though we have a community property system of marital property.

His bride will not become liable for the debts he brings to the marriage.

If the newlyweds elect to have community property, then the community property is liable for the baggage he brings, but those debts will not follow his spouse.

Personal liability

A basic principle of law is that each person is only personally liable for debts they create: marriage does not automatically make the spouses liable for each others debts. An exception is debts for necessities of life.

In California, a marriage can be seen as comprising three entities (wouldn’t you know it in California):

  • husband,
  • wife, and
  • the community property.

California law assumes that assets acquired during marriage are community property. The entirety of the community property is liable for the debts of either spouse.

Under this system, then, if husband contracts a debt, husband’s creditor can reach both halves of the community property to satisfy that debt.

If the parties don’t have community property, as by reason of a pre nuptial agreement, then the creditor can reach only the husband’s earnings and assets for debts he incurs.

If the spouses divorce, the community is terminated. Once the community property is divided in the divorce, that former community property becomes the separate property of the recipient spouse.

Bringing debts to the marriage

Because community property is liable for the debts incurred by both spouses, before and after they marry, those debts can certainly impact the household finances.

Bankruptcy may be one way to wipe the slate clean.  One spouse can file bankruptcy even during the marriage and get a discharge of that spouse’s debts.  The community property is freed of claims against it for debts discharged in the bankruptcy.

Except for joint debt included in the bankruptcy case, one spouse’s bankruptcy filing doesn’t impact the other spouse’s credit record.

The other approach to an indebted spouse is to make an agreement, preferably before wedding, that limits or negates the acquisition of community property.  That’s a prenuptial agreement.

A debt free spouse with a prenuptial agreement is insulated from loss of wages or property in their name to their spouse’s creditors.

 

More about community property in bankruptcy.

New California Bankruptcy Exemptions

By

california exemptions

Californians filing bankruptcy got an increase in the exemptions that protect their assets on April 1, 2019.

Every three years, the dollar amounts are adjusted for changes in the cost of living.

Californians don’t get to protect possessions under the Bankruptcy Code’s exemptions.  Instead, a California resident who files bankruptcy must use California exemption law. That’s the case even though bankruptcy is governed by federal law.

Don’t shed a tear for the bankruptcy exemptions:  the state exemptions are arguably better.

You have a choice of two exemption systems.  One choice is the standard California state law exemptions found in Code of Civil Procedure 704.  These are the exemptions  applicable in state law collections as well as bankruptcy.

The second choice, appealing to those without significant equity in their home, is the California bankruptcy exemptions found at CCP 703.140(b).

What do debtors get to keep

Here’s the new  list of increasedCalkifornia bankruptcy exemptions

Principal residence$29,275
Vehicles$5,860
Household goods per item$725
Jewelry$1,750
Grubstake$1,550
Business assets$8,725
Loan value of life insurance$15,650
Personal injury claims$29,275
Other misc. exemptions703.140

Californians, because they are required to choose one state exemption system or the other rather than the federal bankruptcy exemptions, can also use the federal list of non bankruptcy exemptions.

Bankruptcy wild card exemption

The trickiest part of the California bankruptcy exemptions is what’s called the “wild card”. (It’s also called the “grubstake”.)    When 703.140(b)(1) and (b)(5) are added together, the debtor can protect $30.825 of equity in any asset or combination of assets.  That’s the wild card.wild card exemption

The wild card amount can be parceled out to protect some cash in a bank account;  some equity in a vehicle that exceeds the car exemption; stock; a  business or whatever else you have.

The point is that the exemption isn’t restricted to a certain kind of property.  It can be used to protect anything.

How exemptions work

Exemptions protect the specified amount of equity in an asset.

If it’s a house, the exemption protects a certain amount of value in the property that exceeds the liens on the property.  It doesn’t matter if the value of the house is $200,000 or $1,200,000.  The exemption protects the specified amount of equity in the house.

If there is equity in a house over and above the total of liens and the homestead, a Chapter 7 trustee can sell the house and give the debtor the homestead exemption in cash.

That doesn’t happen very often.  Because, there has to be enough equity to pay the costs of sale, any capital gains taxes and the trustee’s commission before the sale benefits creditors.

More about secret exemptions

If neither California exemption system adequately protects your  assets, consider Chapter 13.

More

Exemptions in Chapter 13

Debts of spouses

Image courtesy of Flickr and k2d2vaca.

Wild card:

California Community Property Creates A Marital Threesome

By

 

3 paper dolls_optSounds kinky, doesn’t it?

Three players in a marriage.

Sharing.

Everything.

Only this is something you can talk about openly, without blushing: community property.

Community property is the default arrangement in California for a married couple.

Yet it is poorly understood by those affected by it and it isn’t inevitable.

How community property works

The community property system provides that everything acquired during marriage is equally owned by the spouses, regardless of which spouse acquired it.

Property owned before marriage or acquired by gift or inheritance is the separate property of the spouse who acquired it.

The most vivid way to imagine the community property system is to see marriage as comprised (for financial issues) of three players:

  • husband,
  • wife, and
  • the community property.

Each of the three may have different exposure to debts.

[ I speak here of the traditional composition of a marital couple, but remember that both same sex couples and registered domestic partners fall under the California community property system. ]

The central concept is that only the person who contracts for a debt is personally liable.

Personal liability will outlast the marriage.  It’s yours, married or not.

The community, however, is liable, regardless of who incurred the debt.

All of the community property is liable for the debts of either spouse.  There’s no halvsies here: no “my half of the community is liable for my debts”.

On money issues, the community is all in.  All the community property is liable for the debts incurred during marriage, regardless of which spouse incurred them.

And that’s not all:  the community property is liable for the debts of either spouse incurred before marriage.

Liable for my spouse’s debts?

You, personally, don’t become liable for your spouse’s debts by reason of living in a community property state.

That means that the credit card company can’t sue you for a debt contracted by your spouse.  So, no judgment against you for his debts.

But a judgment against your spouse can be collected from the community property, including your wages!

Community property can be avoided

Spouses in California are free to agree that they won’t have community property.

That’s what a pre nuptial agreement is often about.  Spouses can agree that their accumulations during marriage will be the separate property of each spouse.

If you are already a married Californian, maybe the three of you want to talk about this.

More

New community property case shakes things up

Community property in bankruptcy

 

 

Does Bankruptcy Discharge A Judgment In California?

By

591px-Geologic_map_California_opt

Nothing gets a person into a bankruptcy lawyer’s office quicker than being served with a lawsuit.

The prospect of losing a lawsuit and having a judgment entered against them terrifies.

Callers are frantic to see if they can file bankruptcy before judgment is entered.

They worry that once a judgment is entered, their options in bankruptcy vanish.

Not so.

The debt underlying a California judgment remains just as dischargeable as it was before the case was filed.

And,  a judgment in California does not automatically become a lien on the defendant’s property.

It takes another step in California for a money judgment to become a lien.  And as long as there is no lien, the debt is unsecured and  potentially dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Discharge turns on kind of debt

Contrary to what some dishonest debt collectors will tell you, judgments are just as dischargeable in bankruptcy as the underlying debt is.

Whether an unsecured debt can be discharged in bankruptcy looks at  the nature of the debt, not whether a court has ruled on the merits of the claim.

So,

  • Child support is non dischargeable, whether or not there is a judgment.
  • Debts incurred by fraud are non dischargeable in bankruptcy, if the creditor can prove fraud to bankruptcy standards.
  • Credit card debts honestly incurred are dischargeable, judgment or no.

Liens change everything

What does change the dynamic is an abstract of judgment or a notice of judgment lien.

These documents do create a lien on the judgment debtor’s assets.

Recording an abstract of judgment creates a lien on real property in the county in which it is filed.  A notice of judgment filed with the California Secretary of State creates a judgment lien on personal property located in the state.

If the lien cannot be avoided in bankruptcy, the judgment creditor has obtained an advantage.

What my friend Jay Fleischman’s post about civil judgments in New York and their bankruptcy implications points out is the way state law impacts the operation of federal bankruptcy law.

The rights that each party in a bankruptcy case brings to the bankruptcy case originate in state law.

It also demonstrates why lawyers are licensed in each state and why my California law license does not entitle me to practice bankruptcy law in New York.

And why bankruptcy is not a do-it-yourself project.

More

When you’re served with a lawsuit

Three debts bankruptcy doesn’t discharge

Everything you need to know about judgments

Wage garnishment survival guide

Who are the really scary creditors

Image in the public domain, courtesy of Wikimedia.

Debt Collectors Distort Community Property Law

By

distorted lawCalifornia community property law is complicated.

I get it.

It shouldn’t surprise me that debt collectors don’t understand community property.

Or maybe, they find it inconvenient to understand.  Or deliberately distort the law.

Collector expands spousal liability

A client reported that her ex husband had been told by a debt collector that the former marriage made him personally liable for his exwife’s debts.

There must be an emphatic, yet polite, word for b***s****.

Wish I knew the word… “Balderdash” seems so weak.

In my most generous view, this could be debt collectors from outside of California who are clueless about community property law. Or, more realistically, they’ll say whatever they think will scare a payment out of someone.

What California spouses owe

For the record, living in a community property state such as California does not make each spouse personally liable for the contractual debts incurred by their spouse.

If your spouse in California takes out a credit card and runs up a balance, you are not liable to the card issuer for the debt. The community property is liable for the debt, but you are not liable.

Community property law in a nutshell

During the marriage, property that a married couple acquires is presumed to be community property.  That community property includes your earnings as well as those of your spouse.

It may feel like community property law makes you personally liable, but the liability doesn’t follow you out of the marriage.

Death, divorce or a post post nuptial agreement with your spouse not to have community property ends whatever exposure you, personally, have for your spouse’s debts.

If there is no community property, then only the person who contracted the debt is liable for it.

Don’t take legal advice from debt collectors

My client’s encounter with the all-knowing debt collector is all too typical of collectors.

This is but one of the “whoppers” told by debt collectors.

Engage skepticism when dealing with this breed.

Or take notes, and check out the requirement that collectors tell the truth found in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and California’s Rosenthal Act.

More

Make debt collectors pay you

How debt collector nearly cost elders their home

When filing bankruptcy is the right move

 

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories