Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

$7000 Off The Price Of The Car In Chapter 13

By

 

When the client finally got me a copy of the car finance contract, it saved them $7000 on the price of the car.

They’d tried just giving me the monthly statement.

But that statement on the car loan didn’t show the bombshell that I found when I finally examined the contract:

Included in the loan for the new car was the unpaid balance on their old trade in!

In bankruptcy-speak, that’s negative equity, and negative equity isn’t entitled to payment in full in Chapter 13.

So we can reduce what they  pay for the car by the $7000  of the loan that paid off the trade-in.  It really was worth the effort to find the contract.

Sleuthing in bankruptcy

I know, the amount of paper a diligent bankruptcy lawyer wants from you is daunting.

There’s loan documents, deeds, IRA statements, bank balances, insurance policies, pay stubs, and tax returns.

It can seem overwhelming and sometimes pointless.  I get it.

Some of what we’re gathering is defensive:  to show that the information in your bankruptcy schedules is correct.  After all, disclosure is the price of getting a bankruptcy discharge.

But some of the paper we need supports our offense:  having found the portion of the car loan that related to the trade in rather than the new car, we can slice $7000 off of the debt.

Same thing about getting payroll tax returns.  Not everything a small-business employer owes the IRS is a must-pay.  But we’ve got to get the right paper to figure that out.

Just believe that we are asking for documents for a real reason.  Like reducing the loan by $7000.

Car loans in bankruptcy

The auto side of this story is worth the telling, too.  The ability to manipulate car loans is one of the appealing features of Chapter 13.

Only purchase-money:  After the 2005 bankruptcy amendments, car lenders got a windfall on cars purchased in the three years, more or less, before the bankruptcy.  “Reform” entitled car lenders to more than their collateral was worth. (The lenders had a bigger lobbying budget than consumers when the law was passed).

But the 9th Circuit judges have held that the negative-equity part of a car finance transaction isn’t part of the purchase money loan.  Thus we can strip out the  payoff of the trade-in from the loan balance that must be paid.

Likewise, a debtor can reject gap insurance, maintenance contracts and other add-ons that aren’t part of the value of the car itself.

Interest rate changes:  Regardless of when a car loan was made, Chapter 13 can alter the interest rate that the lender gets on the loan through Chapter 13.  So the 10-15% car loan may pay something closer to 4-5% under the Chapter 13 plan.

Term extended:  A Chapter 13 plan can extend the remaining term of a car loan to match the length of the bankruptcy case.  Spread over more months, the monthly bite of a car loan in your budget can be reduced.

And that’s just a part of the reason that I love Chapter 13.

More

Car loans in Chapter 7

Expert tips on buying a car

Speak fluent bankruptcy

 

Choosing Between Bankruptcy Chapters

By

choose bankruptcy chapter

Seven or Thirteen?

13 or 7?

When you have a choice, how do you decide which chapter of bankruptcy works best?

Usually, the choice is driven by the scope of the discharge and the kind of debts you have.

More kinds of  debts are dischargeable in Chapter 13 and the automatic stay protects you for the 60 month duration of the case.

So why did the client this week choose to walk out of Chapter 7 with fewer debts discharged than if he’d chosen 13?

It’s all about his  future.  And who will get to share in his growing earning capacity.

Chapter 7 over Chapter 13

On the surface, this client seemed a great candidate for Chapter 13, which is my favorite  bankruptcy chapter.

Some of his debts were only dischargeable in Chapter 13;  in Chapter 7, he’d emerge still owing some debts from a divorce.

So why choose the smaller discharge?

Because his earnings were likely to double or triple over the life of a Chapter 13 case.

If that happened, we anticipated that a Chapter 13 trustee would move to modify his payment plan to pay more to general unsecured creditors.

Credit card debt, which would get nothing in a Chapter 7, might well get a substantial repayment from his increased earnings.

He’d pay fewer dollars paying the non dischargeable debt that survives a Chapter 7 directly than he would paying in a larger slice of his paycheck  to all of his creditors in a Chapter 13 plan.

Chapter 13 after confirmation

Judges approve Chapter 13 plans based on the situation when the bankruptcy case is filed.  The means test looks at recent income.  The liquidation test looks at non exempt assets at filing.

For this client, each of those numbers was modest and a repayment plan would be relatively cheap.

But Chapter 13 involves committing your future income to the supervision of the Chapter 13 trustee.

Now, that supervision is pretty minimal:  it usually means the trustee monitors your tax returns to see in your income has increased.

If there’s a significant increase, the trustee can file a motion with the court proposing increased monthly payments going forward.

The debtor gets to respond with updated expense schedules, and if the parties can’t reach a deal, a judge decides whether payments change.

In the Bay Area, this happens very infrequently.  I’ve seen it less than a half dozen times in 20+ years of doing lots of 13’s.

But it can happen, and for this client, it seemed quite likely that a new job in his usual profession would dramatically increase his income.

Chapter 7 looks at today

If Chapter 13 is a years long process, Chapter 7 is a single event.

The rights of the debtor and the creditors are determined by the situation on the day the case is filed.

If the means test says that Chapter 7 is an option, then the creditors get only what the debtor owns at the filing of the case.

And what the creditors share in is only what’s left after the debtor chooses his exempt property.  Most Chapter 7 cases make no distribution to creditors.

Future income belongs to the debtor.  The Chapter 7 trustee can’t come back a year later and ask for a slice of a larger paycheck.

So, much to my surprise, when we looked at this client’s current situation and his prospects, the more limited discharge was a better deal than Chapter 13.

He’ll get to enjoy a larger share of his future earnings and a fresh start.

More

How to make your divorce bankruptcy-proof

When your ex files bankruptcy

Dividing debts in divorce

 

When Can I File Bankruptcy Again

By

calendarYou can file bankruptcy tomorrow, so long as you don’t currently have a bankruptcy case pending.

When you can get a discharge in that case is a different story.

The Bankruptcy Code limits the frequency of getting a discharge, not the filing and completion of the bankruptcy case.

My friend Gene Melchionne wrote a marvelous piece about the timing of the bankruptcy discharge that conjures up the old high school cheer:  2, 4, 6, 8, who do we appreciate.

The waiting period between cases, if you want a discharge, can be 2 years, 4 years, 6 years or 8 years, depending on what kind of case you filed before and what kind of case you want to file now.

You count those years from the filing of the first case to the filing of the second case.

But, contrary to the usual thinking, the discharge isn’t everything.

Sounds like heresy from a bankruptcy lawyer, doesn’t it,  but let me tell you a couple of stories.

The no discharge Chapter 7

My client had a house with equity, a recent bankruptcy discharge, and a criminal conviction that had him heading to prison, soon.

He faced a future with no income and no way to pay the mortgage.  And at the point he didn’t live in the property, his right to claim a California homestead in the property was in doubt. [Read more…]

How One Family Settled Huge Debt For Pennies

By

debt settlement
When he started the Chapter 13 trek, he owed $370,000 in personal loans and credit cards.

As he completes his plan, he will have settled that debt for three cents on the dollar.

No tax is due on the forgiven debt and no listed creditor can legally come back to try to collect the difference.

And that’s why I love Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

Chapter 13 in the real world

I’ve talked here lots about how Chapter 13 is structured, how plan payments are calculated, and all the nifty things Chapter 13 can do for those with bills they can’t pay.  It’s sometimes dry and dense, but you see how it works.

But here’s how it worked for one real family now completing their plan.

They confirmed a Chapter 13 that resolved their debt for 3% of what they owed when they filed.

They got five years to pay that 3%, interest free.

The payments through their plan cured any pre bankruptcy arrears on their house, in full and without interest or penalty.

They were protected from the taxing authorities while they cured delinquent property taxes.

And in our insane real estate market in the Bay Area, their home appreciated about 50%.  Appreciation that is theirs, rather than their creditors’.

Plan payment driven by asset value

Not all unsecured creditors are as lucky as the creditors in this case, who got something on their claims, even if it was only three cents.

Because the couple had some stock and other assets that weren’t exempt, their plan had to guarantee unsecured creditors a share of the $11,500 value of those non exempt assets.

Based on their income and the infamous means test, general unsecured creditors wouldn’t have gotten anything.

So, the take-away is that just what you have to pay in Chapter 13 is decided by the interaction of the kind of debts you have; the income that the law says is available to pay those debts; and the value of your non exempt assets.

But seen from the top of this mountain, Chapter 13 is powerful.  And the view of life after bankruptcy is stunning.

More

Life after bankruptcy

How Chapter 13 plan payments are calculated

Little known alternative to bankruptcy

 

Homestead Exemptions: The Truth Isn’t What You Think

By

patchwork

“They can’t take my house, whatever happens.  Right?”

The young man in my office “knew” that the substantial equity in his home was exempt as a homestead, even if he filed bankruptcy.

He “knew” that credit card debt was dischargeable.

And that “knowledge” lead to his conviction that , in bankruptcy, he could keep the house and ditch the credit card debt without payment.

Wrong.

In his mind, bits of legal truth got stitched together into a bankruptcy myth.  Let’s unravel the truth.

California homestead

True:  every California homeowner can claim a homestead in their principal residence.  CCP 704.720

But:  the homestead is limited to a certain amount of value.  For the single guy sitting across my desk, that amount was $75,000.  Equity in his condo in excess of that isn’t protected by the homestead.

Worse, the homestead is only effective against certain kinds of creditors.  The tax liens that were of record for old tax years aren’t defeated by a state law homestead.   So the tax liens remain enforceable. *

Credit card debt is dischargeable

True:  unsecured credit card debt (not incurred by fraud) can be wiped out in bankruptcy.

But: the discharge speaks to whether the debt survives the bankruptcy and is enforceable afterwards.  Being dischargeable doesn’t mean that creditors don’t share in the bankruptcy distribution.

Asset value matters in bankruptcy

True:  every debtor can claim exemptions that protect the exempt amount from being paid out to creditors in the bankruptcy case.

But:  the asset value not protected by an exemption is available to pay the claims of creditors, as far as that value goes.  For most unsecured creditors, all they get from the debtor is their pro rata share of the non exempt property of the estate.   Any unpaid balance is discharged.

Bankruptcy truths

So when the bits of the law my client got right are expanded and seen as a whole,  any bankruptcy discharge was unlikely to result in paying less to his creditors, because his house represented far more value than the debts, dischargeable and non dischargeable, that he owed.

Likely, in either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, his creditors would get 100% of their claims.  In my view, any amount he might save in reducing the interest accruing on those claims to the bankruptcy interest rate would be eaten up by the legal fees to file the case, and the credit hit he would incur.

True story of huge savings on credit card debt

The one critical bankruptcy advantage might be the power of the automatic stay:  if the mortgage lender threatened a foreclosure before he could cure the secured arrears, bankruptcy could stop foreclosure long enough to either propose a Chapter 13 plan, or arrange family help to keep the house.

* In Chapter 13, the homeowner could strip a tax lien down to the value of the home after all senior liens were subtracted.  The stripped down lien would have to be paid in full through the plan.  The balance of the tax lien would be treated as an unsecured claim.

More

Bankruptcy myths abound

Everything you need to know about the California homestead exemption

Who gets paid first in bankruptcy

 

 

Personal Assets Can Be At Risk For Your Business Debts

By

Business debt can bleed over into an entrepreneur’s personal assets, to the apparent amazement of a recent client.

He was aghast that the generous equity in the home he and his wife owned was at risk when his corporate business folded.

That was not because the shareholder is liable for the corporation’s debts.  A properly operated corporation confines the business debts to the corporate entity.

No,  it’s because he signed the business lease in his individual name.  And because he was a corporate officer who didn’t pay all the payroll taxes for the corporation’s employees.

As a person liable for a debt, his assets (and the whole of the community property in California) are exposed to creditors.

Exemptions protect some assets, up to a specificed dollar value, but the equity in the family home is at risk when debts incurred for business go unpaid.

Understand the California homestead

When business vs. personal distinction matters

The only time that it matters whether a debt is personal rather than business is when figuring the infamous means test.  The means test applies only to those whose debts are “primarily consumer”.

Debts incurred in business, taxes, and debts imposed by law are not “consumer” debts.  If those kinds of debts exceed the total of consumer debts, the means test doesn’t apply.  There is no need to “qualify” for bankruptcy relief by reason of income.

Sole proprietors are fully at risk

As a matter of debtor-creditor law, if your business is a proprietorship, there is no legal distinction between you and your business.  The debts you incur to run the business have the same legal rights to payment from your assets, personal and business,  as the debts incurred for personal living.

When the business is one with the business owner, failure to pay any debt imperils both business and business owner.

Isolating business debt

Corporations and LLC’s are legal “persons” invented to create a distinction between the business and the business owner.  The corporation can incur debt in its name alone, and only it is liable.

The practical catch is that vendors and landlords may not want to extend credit where the only “person” liable is a thinly capitalized corporation. They may insist on a guarantor.  Execute that guarantee of the corporation’s debt, and the individual has staked his personal assets to pay the debt.

The other way owners of corporate businesses become liable for the business debts is inattention.  They never change the vendor accounts to the corporate name when they incorporate.

They are sloppy about how they sign business agreements.

How to sign for your corporation

They take a business credit card and don’t realize that they are personally liable.

Who needs bankruptcy

In the case of the entrepreneur I met with, it turns out that the corporation is liable for very little and it can survive as an entity if there is a business future;  the shareholder however is a likely candidate for a Chapter 13, to keep the house and pay the debts over time.

More

Is it safe to file a corporate bankruptcy?

Asset protection for everyday folks

How exemptions work

Divorce And The Ticking Debt Bomb

By

 

dynamite-1293082_1280_opt

Debts of the marriage often outlive the marriage itself.

Yet left-over debts are nothing but trouble.

But too often, divorcing couples don’t mop up the joint debts they held during the marriage, and the situation blows up years later when one ex-spouse hits financial trouble.

Joint account remained open after divorce

It’s playing out in a bankruptcy case I have now:

  • divorce final for decades.
  • no balance on joint line of credit when the spouses divorced
  • no one closed the account

When one spouse hit a rough patch, she accessed the left-over line of credit, big time.  But it wasn’t enough to avoid the need for bankruptcy.

My client’s financial mess threatens to slop over to the former spouse who remained listed on a dormant line of credit.

Even though the current debt is long after the divorce, the ex spouse remains liable to the lender because his name is on the account.

During the marriage, the community would have gotten the benefit of the community property discharge.  Not so after divorce, when there is no community.

What is discharged on joint debt

My client can discharge the debt to the lender, but not the debt to the long-since ex spouse.  That’s because obligations between spouses, such as the division of debt, can’t be discharged in Chapter 7

Unpaid support in bankruptcy

I see a couple of possible outcomes in my case:

  • The indemnification clause in the divorce agreement will require my client to make the ex whole.
  • The other spouse’s reported efforts to close the account will serve to insulate him from the debt.
  • In the face of the bankruptcy, the lender will not pursue the uninvolved ex.

It’s early days on this particular episode.  But the broader lesson is clear:  clean up all joint financial matters during the divorce.

Every joint obligation left for untangling later is a ticking time bomb.  Leaving a refinance, a property transfer, or a joint account for “later” exposes one ex spouse to the debts and financial travails of the other.

Former spouses got a big bump in their protections from consequences of bankruptcy filings by their ex’s in the bankruptcy “reform” act of 2005.  Now, no debt created by a divorce is dischargeable in a  Chapter 7.

So the obligations created by an agreement to indemnify or hold harmless the other spouse from debts will survive Chapter 7.

But the value of that indemnification right may be questionable if the person required to protect the other former spouse has just gone through bankruptcy.  If the protected spouse has to pay the lender, the only remedy is to sue the ex, who just went through bankruptcy.

So, clean up the debt situation in the divorce, just as throughly as you divide the assets.

Image courtesy of Fort Meade.

Why Your Mortgage Lender Won’t Send Statements After Bankruptcy

By

Don't gag mortgage servicersLists of stupid laws are lots of fun, when they don’t really touch your life.

But the law that gags mortgage lenders after bankruptcy isn’t funny.

Preventing lenders from sending mortgage statements to homeowners after bankruptcy just sets families up for foreclosure and rewards servicers with the fees that follow default.

It’s just a stupid result that no one has fixed.

Bankruptcy laws collide

Two clients this week weren’t laughing when two different bankruptcy laws collided:

One law says that the lender’s lien on your home remains enforceable after bankruptcy.

The second law prohibits efforts to collect a debt after bankruptcy.

The survival of the lien after bankruptcy protects the secured lender;  the injunction against post bankruptcy collection protects the debtor.

But what if the debtor wants, and needs, to continuing paying?  The intersection of these two provisions thwarts both. [Read more…]

Pay Off Credit Cards Without Interest And Be Debt Free

By

The  sixtyish client sitting in my office had assets worth 10 times his credit card debt.

What could bankruptcy possibly do for someone who was solvent?

His problem was liquidity and an income that was certain to decline in the next few years.

His generous disability income would end at 65, leaving him with only Social Security and the income from the illiquid annuities to live on.

Minimum payments on $50,000 of credit card debt took 40% of his current income.  It would take 42 years to pay it off at contract terms.

Like so many clients, he wanted desperately to pay off the debt, yet the credit card interest rates made it impossible without selling off the assets on which he relied for a stable future.

Care to guess what saved the day?  The Federal Reserve!

The interest rate on federal funds was at .18%.  Less than one percent.

It’s the federal funds rate that defines the interest rate on federal judgments, and therefore the interest a solvent debtor must pay creditors in Chapter 13.

In a Chapter 13 plan, he could keep his house, preserve the annuities he’d need for his support at 65, and  pay the face amount of the debt plus minuscule interest. [Read more…]

The Flat Wrong 1099

By

credit-squeeze-transparentWhen her soon-to-be-ex filed bankruptcy, my client got a 1099-C for the joint credit card.

The form claimed that the debt was cancelled.

Therefore, she had additional income equal to the card balance.

Only, none of the statements on the 1099 were true.

The debt wasn’t discharged as to the non filing spouse.  One spouse’s discharge does not discharge the personal liability of anyone else.

Further, the liability of the soon-to-be-ex wasn’t even discharged yet since it was the beginning of a 3 year Chapter 13.

The discharge doesn’t come until all the plan payments are made.

What to do?

Cancelled debt and taxes

Tax law requires the holder of a debt that is forgiven to report the forgiveness to the IRS.

The forgiveness can be voluntary, as in, we compromised the debt and now you owe less.

Or, it can be by operation of law:  you filed bankruptcy and discharged the debt.

Either way, the tax man sees the amount of money that you no longer owe as if it were cash income.

And, if it’s income, then you owe tax on the income.

No tax in bankruptcy

If my client was the spouse who had filed bankruptcy, she would properly have gotten a 1099-C, at the end of the case.  When the debt was truly gone.

But she wouldn’t have owed tax on the discharged debt, because bankruptcy is an exception to the rule.

Debt forgiven in any chapter of bankruptcy does not trigger cancellation of debt income.  Therefore, no tax.

Tax treatment of cancelled debt is one of the sterling features of bankruptcy that make it superior to debt settlement.

Attacking the erroneous 1099

Strike first, is my thought, when the 1099 is wrong.

The credit card company issued the defective 1099. Write the issuer and request an amended 1099.

The deadline for sending out 1099’s is about six weeks earlier than the deadline for submitting the 1099’s to the IRS.

Jump on the problem right away and attempt to correct the situation before it gets to the IRS.

When the IRS gets bad information

If you couldn’t head off a submission to the IRS that was wrong, tackle the problem in your tax return.

You can’t just file the return as if the IRS didn’t think you had this  extra “income”.  You have to address the error and overcome it.

The IRS has a form for claiming an exception to the cancellation of debt income rule:  Form 982.

Attach your explanation of why the 1099 is wrong to the 982.  There isn’t a box, or an “other” category on the form where you can provide further information, so you’ll have to attach your explanation to the form.

If not resolved at the issuer level, my client will have to point out that she hasn’t been relieved of the debt, since she hasn’t filed the bankruptcy AND that her spouse hasn’t yet been relieved of the debt yet either, as there is no discharge.

Wash, rinse and repeat

I’ve spoken as though the IRS was the sole taxing authority involved.

If you live in a state with an income tax, you must repeat the drill described for the IRS with your state tax agency.

Personal liability required

Probably the most common error in issuing 1099’s is the matter of personal liability.  If the debt cancelled was non-recourse, the borrower had no personal liability in the first place.

Cancellation of a non recourse debt doesn’t alter the borrower’s balance sheet.  The borrower wasn’t personally liable before cancellation, so there’s no cancellation of debt income to address.  More on the fictional 1099.

As I said, see above and wash, rinse and repeat.

More on tax

Discharging taxes in bankruptcy

Tax liens after bankruptcy

When tax debt is a life sentence

 

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories