Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

Chapter 13 To The Rescue In Ruinous Business Lawsuit

By

rescued

Twice in the last six months, Chapter 13 bankruptcy has saved clients facing catastrophic lawsuits arising out of business.

And because the targets of these lawsuits filed bankruptcy before they’d spent a fortune on lawyers and before the court had a chance to award huge damages, they fit beneath the Chapter 13 debt limits.

We think of Chapter 13 as a consumer tool.  It’s designed for those with a regular income.  It’s sometimes called a wage earner plan.  The amount of debt involved has to be below certain limits.

So, Chapter 13’s application to business lawsuits isn’t obvious.

But it works like a charm.

Here’s how Chapter 13 rescued one client sued about a business dispute.

Chapter 13 filed before judgment

Chapter 13 is not available to everyone.  Only individuals can file.  Their debts must fall below certain amounts.

But, critically, the debt limits in Chapter 13 apply to debts that are liquidated.  That means that the amount of money owing is fixed.

Liquidate:  to determine the amount of indebtedness or damages.

The lawsuit my client faced asked for “damages according to proof”.  The former business associate claimed many measures of harm, all of which was disputed.  The claim was unliquidated; you couldn’t see or calculate the claim from the face of the complaint.

The suit could not be ignored.  And given the attitude of the plaintiff, the seriousness of the allegations, and the complexity of the case, it was going to be expensive to try.  And ruinous if the plaintiff won.

By filing Chapter 13 before trial, the claim was UNliquidated when the bankruptcy was filed.

No matter how much the plaintiff claimed was owed, because no amount of damages had been determined before the bankruptcy was filed, the unliquidated debt didn’t count against the Chapter 13 debt caps. [For context, when the plaintiff later filed a claim, he sought $15,000,000!]

Why Chapter 13 rocks

Chapter 13 offers eyepopping advantages over other forms of bankruptcy that my client could have chosen.  The first advantage is that a debtor in Chapter 13 stays in possession and control of his assets during the case.

By contrast, in Chapter 7, a court appointed trustee takes legal control of the debtor’s assets.  The trustee is tasked with turning non exempt assets into cash for the benefit of creditors.

My client could have seen his home sold in a Chapter 7, long before it was determined if he really owed the former business associate anything.

In a Chapter 11, which has no debt caps, he could have stayed in possession of his assets.  But to confirm a Chapter 11 plan, he would have to get the votes of his creditors in favor of a plan.  An angry creditor with a large claim is unlikely to vote for a plan the debtor sees as desireable.

In Chapter 13, the role of creditors in approving a plan is much smaller.  A creditor can object only on certain grounds found in the bankruptcy code.  Being unhappy with the amount being paid to creditors is not one of the permissible objections.

Confirmation tests for Chapter 13

Not to mention that the legal fees in Chapter 11 are invariably much larger than in Chapter 13.

Plan confirmation limits the damage

When the Chapter 13 plan proposed by my client was confirmed, that plan effectively limited for all time the amount he’d have to pay to put all of his debts behind him.

Where a creditor with a California judgment can collect that judgment for 10 years, and renew it for another 10 years, confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan limits what creditors get.  The pot of money the debtor will create through the plan equals the amount that would have been paid to creditors if the bankruptcy case had been Chapter 7 instead of Chapter 13.

Importantly, the amount a Chapter 7 trustee would distribute is what’s left when the trustee’s expenses have been paid, any capital gains taxes have been paid, and any claims with priority over unsecured creditors have been paid.

Instead of his wages and his acquisitions for the next 10 or 20 years being exposed to levy to pay a judgment, now the client has a 5 year payment plan based on the value of his assets on the day he filed bankruptcy.

Appreciation in value and improvement in financial circumstances all remain with the debtor.

What plaintiff gets if he wins

Confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan which fixes the total amount that unsecured creditors get on their claims limits the up-side to the vicious plaintiff.

The dispute about whether my client owes this guy anything is ongoing;  since we objected to the $15 M claim, the dispute has to be decided somewhere.

If the debtor wins, his other creditors don’t have to share the pot of money created by the plan with plaintiff.

If plaintiff wins and fixes the amount that the debtor owes him, he gets only a larger slice of the same “pie”.  Whether he is owed fifteen dollars or $15, 000,000, plaintiff’s recovery is limited to a share of the money going through the Chapter 13.

At the end of the Chapter 13, any part of the judgment that hasn’t been paid is discharged.

Some pain remains

It’s not going to be a free ride.  My client has been forced to file bankruptcy and still has to pay for representation in the bankruptcy case and for his trial lawyers.

The litigation over plaintiff’s claim won’t be pleasant.

He faces five years of plan payments to fund the Chapter 13 plan.

But even an adverse result at trial will not blot his life for the foreseeable future.

That’s why our legal system favors a fresh start through bankruptcy.  And why I’m a huge fan of Chapter 13.

Personal Assets Can Be At Risk For Your Business Debts

By

Business debt can bleed over into an entrepreneur’s personal assets.  My client was dumbfounded.

He was aghast that the generous equity in the home he and his wife owned was at risk when his corporate business folded.

That was not because the shareholder is liable for the corporation’s debts.  A properly operated corporation confines the business debts to the corporate entity.

How to properly sign for your corporation

No,  it’s because he signed the business lease in his individual name.  And because he was a corporate officer who didn’t pay all the payroll taxes for the corporation’s employees.

As a person liable for a debt, his assets (and the whole of the community property in California) are exposed to creditors.

While exemptions protect some assets, up to a specified dollar value,  the non exempt equity in the family home is at risk when debts incurred for business go unpaid.

Understand the California homestead

When business vs. personal distinction matters

The only time that it matters whether a debt is personal rather than business is when figuring the infamous means test.  The means test applies only to those whose debts are “primarily consumer”.

So, debts incurred in business, taxes and debts imposed by law are not “consumer” debts.

If those kinds of debts exceed the total of consumer debts, the means test doesn’t apply.  There is no need to “qualify” for bankruptcy relief by reason of income.

Sole proprietors are fully at risk

As a matter of debtor-creditor law, if your business is a proprietorship, there is no legal distinction between you and your business.  The debts you incur to run the business have the same legal rights to payment from your assets, personal and business,  as the debts incurred for personal living.

When the business is one with the business owner, failure to pay any debt imperils both business and business owner.

Isolating business debt

Corporations and LLC’s are legal “persons” invented to create a distinction between the business and the business owner.  The corporation can incur debt in its name alone, and only it is liable.

The practical catch is that vendors and landlords may not want to extend credit where the only “person” liable is a thinly capitalized corporation. They may insist on a guarantor.  Execute that guarantee of the corporation’s debt, and the individual has staked his personal assets to pay the debt.

The other way owners of corporate businesses become liable for the business debts is inattention.  They never change the vendor accounts to the corporate name when they incorporate.

They are sloppy about how they sign business agreements.

The myth of the corporate credit card

They take a business credit card and don’t realize that they are personally liable.

Who needs bankruptcy

In the case of the entrepreneur I met with, it turns out that the corporation is liable for very little and it can survive as an entity if there is a business future.

The shareholder, however, is a likely candidate for a Chapter 13, to keep the house and pay the debts over time.

More

Is it safe to file a corporate bankruptcy?

Asset protection for everyday folks

How exemptions work

Getting Excused From Bankruptcy’s Means Test

By

rp_800px-Chihuahua_portrait-300x225.jpgYou can get a pass on the means test without claiming your dog ate your homework. 

If your debt is not “primarily consumer debt”,  you don’t have to pass the means test to file bankruptcy.

So, you need to total up the consumer debt you have and compare it to the rest of your debts.

Don’t miss the fact that tort claims aren’t  “consumer debts” under the means test.

So if tort judgments or even unliquidated tort claims total more than your consumer debt, you don’t have to take the means test.

Check the box, and come on in and file the bankruptcy chapter of your choice.

Tort explained

Let’s start by defining a “tort”.  A tort is a civil wrong, other than a breach of contract, that causes injury or damage to another without excuse.

Automobile accidents make up the largest group of torts.  The law requires everyone to conduct themselves so that others are not hurt.  One who negligently fails to use appropriate care such that someone else is hurt has committed a tort.

Whereas people choose to enter into contracts, and the contract can specify the remedy if one breaches the contract, tort liability is imposed by law.

It is that imposition of liability that courts have looked to in finding that tort damages are not consumer debts for the purposes of bankruptcy law.

Means test controls access to bankruptcy

Virtually everyone who comes into my office has heard about, and obsesses over, the means test.

Often they assume that merely making more than the median income disqualifies them from bankruptcy relief.

Cheat sheet to pass the means test

I remind even bankruptcy lawyers that debt incurred for business or investment purposes and tax debt is not “consumer debt”.  If non-consumer debt predominates,  the means test does not apply.

Now, the logic of giving a pass in bankruptcy to those who don’t pay their taxes eludes me, but that’s Congress for you.

Not consumer debt

But there is a little discussed additional category of debt that is not debt “incurred for personal, family or household” purposes (§ 101(8)) :  tort claims.  The reported cases hold that these sorts of debts aren’t incurred in the manner of contract debts like credit cards and medical bills.

The client in my office had no contractual debt, other than a tiny student loan.  But the pending lawsuit accused him of harboring a dangerous dog.

Now mind you, the dog didn’t weigh 5 pounds and the wound it inflicted was objectively insignificant.  The suit, nonetheless, was expensive to defend, stressful, and could blight an otherwise sound financial life.

The bankruptcy case became just that much simpler  when I recognized that we could bypass the means test.

Tort claims aren’t consumer debts; since the dog bite claim dominated the client’s list of debts, it became irrelevant how much money the client made.

The best way to ace the means test is to avoid it altogether.

More

Even High Income Families Pass The Means Test

The Problem Even A Good Bankruptcy Lawyer Can’t Fix

Discharging Taxes In Bankruptcy

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Which Bankruptcy Chapter Is Right For Me?

By

choose bankruptcy chapter

Seven or Thirteen?

13 or 7?

When you have a choice, how do you decide which chapter of bankruptcy works best?

Usually, the choice is driven by the scope of the discharge and the kind of debts you have.

More kinds of  debts are dischargeable in Chapter 13 and the automatic stay protects you for the 60 month duration of the case.

So why did the client this week choose to walk out of Chapter 7 with fewer debts discharged than if he’d chosen 13?

It’s all about his  future.  And who will get to share in his growing earning capacity.

Chapter 7 over Chapter 13

On the surface, this client seemed a great candidate for Chapter 13, which is my favorite  bankruptcy chapter.

Some of his debts were only dischargeable in Chapter 13;  in Chapter 7, he’d emerge still owing some debts from a divorce.

So why choose the smaller discharge?

Because his earnings were likely to double or triple over the life of a Chapter 13 case.

If that happened, we anticipated that a Chapter 13 trustee would move to modify his payment plan to pay more to general unsecured creditors.

Credit card debt, which would get nothing in a Chapter 7, might well get a substantial repayment from his increased earnings.

He’d pay fewer dollars paying  the non dischargeable debt that survives a Chapter 7  directly than he would paying in a larger slice of his paycheck  to all of his creditors in a Chapter 13 plan.

Chapter 13 after confirmation

Judges approve Chapter 13 plans based on the situation when the bankruptcy case is filed.  The means test looks at recent income.  The liquidation test looks at non exempt assets at filing.

For this client, each of those numbers was modest and a repayment plan would be relatively cheap.

But Chapter 13 involves committing your future income to the supervision of the Chapter 13 trustee.

Now, that supervision is pretty minimal:  it usually means the trustee monitors your tax returns to see in your income has increased.

If there’s a significant increase, the trustee can file a motion with the court proposing increased monthly payments going forward.

The debtor gets to respond with updated expense schedules, and if the parties can’t reach a deal, a judge decides whether payments change.

In the Bay Area, this happens very infrequently.  I’ve seen it less than a half dozen times in 20+ years of doing lots of 13’s.

But it can happen, and for this client, it seemed quite likely that a new job in his usual profession would dramatically increase his income.

Chapter 7 looks at today

If Chapter 13 is a years long process, Chapter 7 is a single event.

The rights of the debtor and the creditors are determined by the situation on the day the case is filed.

If the means test says that Chapter 7 is an option, then the creditors get only what the debtor owns at the filing of the case.

And what the creditors share in is only what’s left after the debtor chooses his exempt property.  Most Chapter 7 cases make no distribution to creditors.

Future income belongs to the debtor.  The Chapter 7 trustee can’t come back a year later and ask for a slice of a larger paycheck.

So, much to my surprise, when we looked at this client’s current situation and his prospects, the more limited discharge was a better deal than Chapter 13.

He’ll get to enjoy a larger share of his future earnings and a fresh start.

More

Cheat sheet for passing the means test

Figuring what you pay in Chapter 13

How to make your divorce bankruptcy-proof

When your ex files bankruptcy

Dividing debts in divorce

 

The Zero Interest Get-Out-Of-Debt Tool: Bankruptcy For The Solvent

By

chapter 13 rescue

Once again, Chapter 13 rescued a client.

He’ll get out of debt and pay (effectively) no interest going forward on his credit cards.

He owned a home, had a job, and was solvent on paper, but he couldn’t sleep for worry about his debts.

Despite having lots of equity in a house, there wasn’t not enough income to retire the debt when the mortgage resets in the spring.

Chapter 7 would get rid of the debt, but cost him his house.

Thank goodness for Chapter 13, where you

  • keep your assets,
  • propose a plan, and
  • get a discharge.

Chapter 13 gets my client out from under credit cards with ruinous interest rates, reduces the interest rate on his high interest car loan, and lets him sleep at night knowing he won’t lose his house to unsecured creditors.

A pretty good deal for a $310 filing fee.

Interest free debt repayment

The good news is that the equity in his house requires that his Chapter 13 plan pay his debts in full. But, “in full” does not mean “with the usual credit card interest”.

Pay off the cards in full in Chapter 13 and you pay only the federal judgment rate.  Currently , that’s little more than  one half of one percent, instead of 18-34% due under the credit card agreements.

To pay off the cards according to their terms outside of bankruptcy, most of each payment for a long while goes to interest.  That’s why credit card issuers are content to have you carry a balance.

For this client, we figure that a 100% repayment plan for the cards and the tax debt will require a payment about 1/3 of what he currently pays each month on the cards.

No need to be broke to file bankruptcy

This client looks good on paper.  He’s solvent due to lots of equity in his house.   He’s current on his bills.

He just sees the freight train coming down the tracks when he reaches the end of the interest-only feature on his home equity loan.

You don’t have to be upside down, financially, to file bankruptcy.  You only need to be willing to play by the rules of the Bankruptcy Code for dealing with your creditors.

The applicable rule for this client says:  if you keep your house with that much equity, you must pay the creditors in full.

Bankruptcy won’t change the terms of his home loan, it will just spread out and pay off the other debts that have a claim on his monthly income.

And, he can stop underwithholding on his taxes.  He had increased his exemptions to get more cash monthly, leaving him owing taxes at the end of the year.

Part of our plan is making the withholding match the taxes owed, so we don’t have a recurring tax problem.

13 was my client’s lucky number.

Free Bankruptcy Advice: Consider The Source

By

big golden dollar symbol with apple. business success

Who gets their legal advice from their adversary?

My client did.

Get your legal advice from your adversary, your brother in law, or the internet and be prepared to get a surprise.  Often, not a pleasant surprise.

My client insisted that his tenant’s debt to him survived the tenant’s bankruptcy “because it was listed on Schedule G“.

The tenant had “explained” to my client that Schedule G was the list of debts the debtor didn’t seek to discharge.  So, my client continued, he was legally free to collect the back rent from the debtor after bankruptcy.

I had to explain it wasn’t so.

Schedule G is not a list of debts the debtor wants to continue paying on; it’s a list of executory contracts and unexpired leases.  The debtor’s obligation for each of those debts is discharged just as the debts listed on Schedule F.

How reaffirmation works

Reaffirmation is the only way that a dischargeable debt survives the discharge.  Reaffirmation requires a timely written agreement made after the bankruptcy is filed and approved by the bankruptcy judge.

None of that had happened in this case.

Law in the information age

The fund of information in our world is immense, and more accessible with the advent of the internet.

Not all of that information , however, is equally reliable.

The law is often complicated and dependent on the facts.  Information gets stale.  Not all bloggers know what they’re talking about.

I cringe when a client tells me that he’s “researched bankruptcy on the internet“.  Too often, the client’s full of misinformation complicated by erroneous assumptions.

I applaud the proactive consumer. Just take what you read on the internet with a grain of salt.  There’s a reason that lawyers go to school for three years before they can even take the bar exam.

If anything important to you rides on the information you seek, seek out a lawyer for some input.

Free legal advice can be really costly, and the cost of a lawyer to fix the situation is usually far greater than the cost of getting it right the first time.

More

Do it yourself bankruptcy

How to interview a lawyer

What should you pay a lawyer

Are you stuck with your current lawyer

Image:  ©VERSUS studio

Old Tax Liability Discharged In Bankruptcy, If….

By

metal-key

Discharging tax debt in bankruptcy gets lots of families out of a horrible hole.

Tax debt can be large and swelled beyond the tax by interest and penalties.  

Collection on old tax debt often compromises the ability to stay current on more recent years.

Bankruptcy can save their bacon because taxes found on returns due three years ago or more are generally dischargeable in bankruptcy.

But there is a key that opens the door to discharging taxes in bankruptcy.

And that key is a return that has been filed.

When old taxes live on

The man in my office expected to wipe out his liability for  several years of taxes that were now four and five years old in a  Chapter 13 case.  Chapter 13 would allow him five years to pay the more recent, non dischargeable taxes through his reorganization plan.

Only the rule for discharging taxes in bankruptcy has three prongs:

  • the three year rule,
  • the two year rule, and
  • the 240 day rule.

Turns out that the returns for those four and five year old taxes were never filed.  He prepared the returns, but didn’t file them because he couldn’t pay the tax due.

So those old taxes failed the two year rule:  

 Exclamation-icons-2taxes for years where the return wasn’t filed on time are only dischargeable when the return has been on file for two years.

The story gets worse:  because the taxes are not priority claims under the bankruptcy code, they don’t get the same special treatment that the more recent tax debts get as priority claims.

The non dischargeable but non priority taxes will get the same fractional payment in Chapter 13 that the medical bills will get, but the tax will survive the bankruptcy and be collectible later because these taxes are non dischargeable.

So, even if you can’t pay the tax now, not filing the return is not a meaningful long term strategy.

File the return and get the two year clock ticking for bankruptcy relief.

Four reasons to file even if you can’t pay

Outside of bankruptcy, the 10 year statute of limitations on collection of federal taxes doesn’t start running until the taxes are assessed by filing a return.

Filing returns without any records

Got no records for the unfiled tax year?  That’s often why a tax return goes unfiled.  Without records, it’s hard to calculate what you owe, or what’s owed to you.

The IRS can help.

You can request a Wage & Income transcript from the IRS for free.  It will tell you what items of income have been reported to the IRS from your employer, bank, or mortgage lender.

Under certain circumstances, that may be as good as you can do.  If you get better information after you’ve filed the return, you can amend the return for three years from filing.

The key is to get a return on file and get those assorted time periods running.

More

Earmark your tax payment and skirt the IRS’s rule

Image: Erulisseuiin

Is There Life After Bankruptcy?

By

multiple questions-grisel d'an flicker_opt

Is bankruptcy worth it?

If you see filing bankruptcy to get a fresh start as painful or less than honorable, you might wonder what life is like, on the other side of bankruptcy.

What’s the return on taking the big step?

I got a report from the other side this week from a Chapter 7 client from 3 years ago.  It knocked me off my chair.

When she filed bankruptcy

Single, well past middle age, a renter, and dead broke when she’d filed, she’d retired, moved, and bought a house!

Her email was entitled:  “A Happy Ending”.

I had been confident that bankruptcy was right for her, but she had found the decision fraught and painful. So it was nice to hear it from the woman who was living the life that it worked out.

I just didn’t image how well it had worked out.

Home ownership?  that soon, on her own, starting with nothing?

I didn’t see that coming.

Bankruptcy makes it possible

The downside of bankruptcy always seems to be at the forefront of the thinking of those struggling with the decision.

Debtors are bombarded with fear inducing visions of life after bankruptcy: no assets, no credit, no self respect.

Debtors image that lenders may ask about bankruptcy filings;  others might find out.  What if something catastrophic happens?

It’s easy to overlook the upside:

  • no holdovers from your current financial life;
  • no stress about promises to pay that you can’t keep;
  • no financial barriers to life improving.

Our laws make a fresh start possible.  Our economy wants us back as consumers.

The barriers to a fresh start are internal.

Usually, all we have to fear are the voices in our head.

This week’s voice from the past said there is a happy ending.

More about deciding to file bankruptcy

What the Motley Fool got wrong about filing bankruptcy

   Filing bankruptcy is all about a better future

   Tax trap in out of court debt settlement

   It’s not about the credit score

Image courtesy of Grisel D’An and Flickr.

California Homestead Exemption: The Truth Isn’t What You Think

By

patchwork

“They can’t take my house, whatever happens.  Right?”

The young man in my office “knew” that the substantial equity in his home was exempt as a California homestead, even if he filed bankruptcy.

He “knew” that credit card debt was dischargeable.

And that “knowledge” lead to his conviction that , in bankruptcy, he could keep the house and ditch the credit card debt without payment.

Wrong.

In his mind, bits of legal truth got stitched together into a bankruptcy myth.  Let’s piece together the truth.

California homestead

True:  every California homeowner can claim a homestead in their principal residence.  CCP 704.720

But:  the homestead is limited to a certain amount of value.  For the single guy sitting across my desk, that amount was $75,000.  Equity in his condo in excess of that isn’t protected by the homestead.

Worse, the homestead is only effective against certain kinds of creditors.  The tax liens that were of record for old tax years aren’t defeated by a state law homestead.   So the tax liens remain enforceable. *

Credit card debt is dischargeable

True:  unsecured credit card debt (not incurred by fraud) can be wiped out in bankruptcy.

But: the discharge speaks to whether the debt survives the bankruptcy and is enforceable afterwards.  Being dischargeable doesn’t mean that creditors don’t share in the bankruptcy distribution.

Asset value matters in bankruptcy

True:  every debtor can claim exemptions that protect the exempt amount from being paid out to creditors in the bankruptcy case.

But:  the asset value not protected by an exemption is available to pay the claims of creditors, as far as that value goes.  For most unsecured creditors, all they get from the debtor is their pro rata share of the non exempt property of the estate.   Any unpaid balance is discharged.

Bankruptcy truths

So when the bits of the law my client got right are expanded and seen as a whole,  any bankruptcy discharge was unlikely to result in paying less to his creditors. His house represented far more value than the debts, dischargeable and non dischargeable, that he owed.

Likely, in either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, his creditors would get 100% of their claims.  In my view, any amount he might save in reducing the interest accruing on those claims to the bankruptcy interest rate would be eaten up by the legal fees to file the case, and the credit hit he would incur.

True story of huge savings on credit card debt

The one critical bankruptcy advantage might be the power of the automatic stay:  if the mortgage lender threatened a foreclosure before he could cure the secured arrears, bankruptcy could stop foreclosure long enough to either propose a Chapter 13 plan, or arrange family help to keep the house.

* In Chapter 13, the homeowner could strip a tax lien down to the value of the home after all senior liens were subtracted.  The stripped down lien would have to be paid in full through the plan.  The balance of the tax lien would be treated as an unsecured claim.

More

Bankruptcy myths abound

Everything you need to know about the California homestead exemption

Who gets paid first in bankruptcy

 

 

The Foreclosure That Was Longer Than War & Peace

By

Fotolia_94610869_XS_opt

Foreclosure is coming.  Whether by choice or circumstances, you know the bank will take the house.

Should you start packing immediately?

The way banks are currently operating, the answer is:  not yet, not soon, not for a long time.

For one of my clients, the answer to how long was well more than 735 days.  And they did nothing to delay the inevitable.

Here’s the foreclosure timeline for this California couple.

A year of missed payments

When they filed bankruptcy in June, 2013, they were 13 months behind on their mortgage.  That’s 390 days without paying.

The house was waaaaay underwater and they decided upfront to let it go.  And said so in the Chapter 13 plan.

From bankruptcy filing to relief from stay

It took 477 days from the commencement of the bankruptcy case for the lender to request and get an order from the bankruptcy court permitting them to foreclose.

Court order til foreclosure

It took another 180 days to actually conduct a  sale.  At that point, the lender owned the house, but the couple was still living there.

Sale to eviction

Then, remarkably, another 271 days went by before the bank took steps to evict the former owners from the house that it had owned for more than 8 months.  And the bank paid the former owners some cash to move out voluntarily.

Your mileage may vary

The experience of this couple doesn’t assure you of a mortgage servicer with a similarly lackadaisical approach.  But it is consistent with the data on California foreclosure.

The takeaway is:  don’t move out until you absolutely have to.

Living rent free til the foreclosure allows you to build up a kitty to finance the move.  Or feed your retirement fund.  Or start saving for a new house.

More:

Get paid to surrender possession

Your rights while you’re in foreclosure

Buying a house after foreclosure

Basics of California foreclosure

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories