Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

Bank Account Safe From Credit Card Debt

By

credit card offsetPossession is 9/10th of the the law, we’ve always been told.

With overdue Bank of America credit cards, my client worried that her new deposit at B of A would be seized by the bank to pay the cards.

After all, the bank would have possession of the commission check and a common law right to set off the deposit against the credit card debt.

Not to worry.  There’s a federal law  that protects bank accounts from credit card debt.

Credit cards can not offset

Federal Truth in Lending regulations explicitly prohibit a bank who is a card issuer from appropriating your deposit account to pay your debt on a card it issued.

(d)Offsets by card issuer prohibited.

(1) A card issuer may not take any action, either before or after termination of credit card privileges, to offset a cardholder‘s indebtedness arising from a consumer credit transaction under the relevant credit card plan against funds of the cardholder held on deposit with the card issuer.

All you need to know about judgments

12 CFR 1026.12 goes on to make clear that if the card issuer gets a judgment, this provision doesn’t insulate a deposit account from a judgment levy.

Nor does it keep the bank from depleting your account if you’ve agreed to pay the card automatically by electronic transfer.

Credit cards exception to common law rule

Offset, or setoff, (they seem to be interchangeable terms) means to net out what one party owes another against a debt that runs in the other direction.

Merriam Webster defines it  this way:

the reduction or discharge of a debt or claim by setting against it a distinct claim in favor of the debtor or party who is the object of the first claim (as in a lawsuit)

This principle is a mainstay of common law.

So, the Truth in Lending provision creates a statutory exception.

Bankruptcy discharge prohibits set off

At the end of a bankruptcy case, the provisions of the bankruptcy discharge prohibit a creditor from offsetting a pre bankruptcy debt against money the creditor owes you.

Section 524 of the Bankruptcy Code reads

(a)A discharge in a case under this title—

(2) operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action, the employment of process, or an act, to collect, recover or offset any such debt as a personal liability of the debtor, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived;

So, if you discharged a personal loan from Bank of America, say, the bank cannot take your post bankruptcy deposits into your account to pay for the discharged debt.

All’s well

With federal law in mind, my client was able to deposit her check into her bank account, secure in knowing the bank couldn’t apply the money she needed to live on next week to pay overdue bank-issued cards.

And her bankruptcy case will wipe out the credit card debt altogether.

Is Your Choice Of Bankruptcy Chapters Really Dictated By Your Stuff?

By

Through my Twitter feed came a link to the pro’s and con’s of filing bankruptcy from the business section of the Chicago Tribune.

Good chance to see how non lawyers see my world, I thought.

Bankruptcy was all about protecting “stuff”, said the writer, and the choice of chapters is driven by the kind of “stuff” you had.

Chapter 13 is for people who have equity in their property;  Chapter 7 is for people who have little and can’t meet their basic expenses, the article went on.

I could quibble about the dichotomy that’s set up that Chapter 7 filers have nothing and Chapter 13 filers have more. (Often, it’s the other way around).

I  further contest  the implied suggestion that the Chapter 7 discharge is broader than Chapter 13.  (It’s not.  In fact, the Chapter 7 discharge is a bit narrower.  It’s just quicker.)

But my real beef is the characterization that bankruptcy is about your stuff and how to keep it.

Not so, in my view.

Bankruptcy is about people, not possessions

Bankruptcy is all about protecting lives.  Sometimes it’s about giving up “stuff” and getting back your life.

Your old age is strongest reason to file bankruptcy

It’s about not paying forever for bad luck or bad choices.  It’s about freeing up money to provide for your future.  It’s  about freeing up mental energy to do something beyond juggle too-little money, subject to too many creditor claims.

Considering bankruptcy is a chance to evaluate what’s really important and what’s possible.

Sometimes, stepping back tells you the house is worth struggling for.  Sometimes, in the big picture, the house is really a dead weight on the important parts of your life.

Bankruptcy is about starting over, or reorganizing.  It’s about recognizing reality and doing something about it.  It’s about being an activist to take back your financial life.

Stuff be damned.

More

Hold or fold?  is bankruptcy the right choice?

Life after bankruptcy

 

@cathymoran

Image courtesy of mojmir_ch.

Does Bankruptcy Discharge A Judgment In California?

By

591px-Geologic_map_California_opt

Nothing gets a person into a bankruptcy lawyer’s office quicker than being served with a lawsuit.

The prospect of losing a lawsuit and having a judgment entered against them terrifies.

Callers are frantic to see if they can file bankruptcy before judgment is entered.

They worry that once a judgment is entered, their options in bankruptcy vanish.

Not so.

The debt underlying a California judgment remains just as dischargeable as it was before the case was filed.

And,  a judgment in California does not automatically become a lien on the defendant’s property.

It takes another step in California for a money judgment to become a lien.  And as long as there is no lien, the debt is unsecured and  potentially dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Discharge turns on kind of debt

Contrary to what some dishonest debt collectors will tell you, judgments are just as dischargeable in bankruptcy as the underlying debt is.

Whether an unsecured debt can be discharged in bankruptcy looks at  the nature of the debt, not whether a court has ruled on the merits of the claim.

So,

  • Child support is non dischargeable, whether or not there is a judgment.
  • Debts incurred by fraud are non dischargeable in bankruptcy, if the creditor can prove fraud to bankruptcy standards.
  • Credit card debts honestly incurred are dischargeable, judgment or no.

Liens change everything

What does change the dynamic is an abstract of judgment or a notice of judgment lien.

These documents do create a lien on the judgment debtor’s assets.

Recording an abstract of judgment creates a lien on real property in the county in which it is filed.  A notice of judgment filed with the California Secretary of State creates a judgment lien on personal property located in the state.

If the lien cannot be avoided in bankruptcy, the judgment creditor has obtained an advantage.

What my friend Jay Fleischman’s post about civil judgments in New York and their bankruptcy implications points out is the way state law impacts the operation of federal bankruptcy law.

The rights that each party in a bankruptcy case brings to the bankruptcy case originate in state law.

It also demonstrates why lawyers are licensed in each state and why my California law license does not entitle me to practice bankruptcy law in New York.

And why bankruptcy is not a do-it-yourself project.

More

When you’re served with a lawsuit

Three debts bankruptcy doesn’t discharge

Everything you need to know about judgments

Wage garnishment survival guide

Who are the really scary creditors

Image in the public domain, courtesy of Wikimedia.

The Difference Between Good Bankruptcy Lawyer and Great Bankruptcy Lawyer

By

question-markFinding the right bankruptcy lawyer may be the difference between a successful bankruptcy and a nightmare.

Choosing a lawyer you can talk to is critical.

You’ll be disclosing lots of information normally held confidential.

But there’s more.

It’s not just a lawyer you can tell your secrets to.

You need to find a lawyer willing to answer your questions, over and over, if necessary, until you understand the choices that you must make in filing bankruptcy.

Until you understand the issues and the consequences, you can’t play your position on the bankruptcy team.

Choices after deciding to file

Some things a client doesn’t have to truly understand to file bankruptcy: how the means test works, or doesn’t work, is one of them.

The debtor need only validate some of the information in the form.

But other bankruptcy issues require the client to make choices and perhaps confront risks.

Is the loan repayment to your parents a recoverable preference?

Does the recent use of your credit card make you susceptible to the charge of incurring debt by fraud?

Are you at risk of a UST challenge to your Chapter 7 case as an abuse?

Decisions surrounding these issues are, in the end, the client’s decision. The factors are complex, and in this day of “new” bankruptcy law, sometimes uncertain.

The client needs to feel absolutely comfortable asking their counsel to explain the issue, assess the risks, and explore alternatives with them.

The lawyer needs to be capable of explaining without jargon or presumption.

The bankruptcy problem your lawyer can’t handle

So I would add to the list of qualities in superior bankruptcy counsel: openness to the layman’s questions.

Great bankruptcy lawyers are willing to restate and reanalyze the options until the client understands.  You need to feel comfortable saying you don’t understand and asking that the lawyer try another way to say it.

A lawyer who is not capable of making you a partner in the conduct of the case may end up excluding you from considerations that rightfully belong to you, the client.

More

Questions to ask a prospective bankruptcy lawyer

What should bankruptcy cost

Can you afford the bankruptcy alternatives

What Causes Bankruptcy?

By

Cure TargetI was playing in my head with a piece I was writing for consumers about the bankruptcy decision.

I caught myself thinking about “whether the bankruptcy was caused by mortgage debt or ….” .

And I hauled myself to a halt.

How did the words “bankruptcy” and “cause” get linked in my head?

In my head, for Pete’s sake?

Bankruptcy is not caused by insolvency, it’s a cure for insolvency.

Debt in excess of assets, particularly liquid assets, causes insolvency.

Where debts come from

The real question should be:  how did the debts arise?

The trite explanation for debt is irresponsible spending and lack of financial self control.

Not in my experiences of the past two decades.

Instead, financial distress most often comes from job loss; ill health; divorce; and multigenerational family issues.

Add to that, the ridiculous cost of housing where I practice in the Bay Area.  Too many folks subscribed to the idea that home ownership is an essential to be really middle class.

Bankruptcy is a cure

If inability to pay your debts is the disease, bankruptcy is the remedy.

The question for families is whether they avail themselves of a freely available, legal remedy for that situation.

Or, do they continuing treading water with respect to their debts until there is a further crisis.

So, for purposes of the blog I was constructing, the  correct construction juxtaposes whether the financial distress was caused by mortgage debt or some other cause.

My message is that bankruptcy is as much a beginning as an end.

It ends the distress of being financially incapable.

It is the beginning of an opportunity to realign spending, to move beyond the misfortunes of the past, and to address the challenges of the present and the future.

Families need cash reserves; they need retirement savings.  Families with children need to save for college if they are to escape a further round of incapacitating debt.

My mantra becomes:  clear thinking and emotional courage cause bankruptcy.  And the debtor is better for it.

More

Is bankruptcy right for you?

Life after bankruptcy

What should bankruptcy cost

Image courtesy of openclipart.org

Do California Seniors Need to File Bankruptcy?

By

Rocking chair on the deck - Antigua, Mar 2010California, it turns out, is a great place to retire.

Not because of the cost of living, certainly.  In spite of the cost of living.

Because California exemptions are very generous to those of retirement age.

Those exemptions effectively make many indebted seniors collection-proof.

How exemptions protect seniors

Exemption laws come from the idea that, even if you owe money to creditors, a certain level of income and assets are protected from collection.

  • If you earn a wage, California law caps the amount of your wages that can be garnished at 25% of your after tax paycheck.
  • Pension income cannot be levied, before or after it’s paid to a retiree.
  • IRA’s are exempt to the extent necessary for support
  • The California homestead is $175,000 for individuals over 65
  • Social Security is exempt everywhere

It’s not hard to see that a California senior with home and retirement income might have nothing that a creditor with a judgment could reach.

That doesn’t mean that creditors will stop trying to collect.  They can bug a retiree, using shame, fear, and annoyance to get them to voluntarily pay a debt they owe.

But there may be no way for the creditor to compel payment of its claim at the present.

Is bankruptcy necessary

So, one of my tests for do you need to file bankruptcy  looks at whether bankruptcy would allow you to keep something that you might otherwise lose to a creditor who gets a judgment against you.

If the answer is yes, bankruptcy may be appropriate.

If the answer is no, it may be different.  If that creditor-with-a-judgment can’t tap your bank account or intercept your pension check, functionally, bankruptcy doesn’t make your situation any better.

You’re safe from your creditors.

Is bankruptcy helpful

But life isn’t all about money.  Peace of mind has a value not measured in dollars and cents.

For some seniors, the fact that they owe money they can’t pay is a source of stress.  Even when they know that the pushy, threatening collector can’t take anything from them, they lose sleep and emotional security.

Bankruptcy might have a benefit to those stressed out seniors, not because it’s necessary to preserve their assets, but because it’s necessary to for their peace of mind.

Bankruptcy and the next generation

Lots of elders are intent on leaving something financial to their heirs.

I hear it repeatedly from those getting along in age:  they want to leave their home to their kids.  They want to keep paying on a life insurance policy, even though no one is dependent on them for their care.  They are stretching themselves financially to give some value to their heirs.

Here’s where bankruptcy makes it possible to leave an inheritance to the next generation.

The exemptions that are available in bankruptcy are not available to a probate estate.  Probate will protect the homestead if there is a surviving spouse.  No surviving spouse who  needs the home to live in, and the home may be sold to pay the elder’s debts before anything goes to the offspring.

Most revocable trusts direct the successor trustee to pay the debts of the person who has passed away before distributing the trust estate to the beneficiaries.

Neither probate nor revocable trusts make it possible to avoid judgment liens that attach to homes.  Bankruptcy does.

So, by eliminating debts and perhaps liens as well, a senior intent on leaving a financial legacy to their survivors maximizes their gift by wiping out their debts during their life time.

Not a bad thing, perhaps.

More

Passing a home to kids without probate or risk

Image courtesy of Ed Yourdon and Flickr.

What’s So Scary About Bankruptcy?

By

killer-scary-public domain_opt (1)

It’s Halloween and we indulge in make-believe scary moments and call it fun.

In real life,  even people up to their eyeballs in debt are scared witless by the thought of filing bankruptcy.

It frightens them more than haunted houses, ghouls, and blood-soaked bodies.

So really:  what’s so scary about filing bankruptcy?

Three unspoken fears about bankruptcy

Thirty eight years of talking with people who’d rather be anywhere other than meeting a bankruptcy lawyer lead me to a theory.

I think they fear

  • loss of control over financial affairs
  • the future with bankruptcy on their record
  • public exposure as a financial failure
Let’s look at each one, in broad daylight, and see if there is anything worthy of fright.

Loss of control

Filing bankruptcy passes nominal ownership of everything you have, outside of some kinds of retirement assets, to the Chapter 7 trustee for the benefit of your creditors.  Not really reassuring on its face.

But in the real world, nearly 98% of Chapter 7 cases are no asset cases.  That means that the debtor loses nothing to the bankruptcy trustee on behalf of creditors.

Either their possessions have little net value or an exemption protects the asset for the debtor’s benefit.

In some situations, it may be hard to tell what assets are worth or whether they are saleable.  The uncertainty makes it unpredicable to pass control to a trustee.

More about how Chapter 13 works

That’s a case for a Chapter 13.   In Chapter 13, the debtor keeps everything he wants to keep, and pays some fraction of their value to creditors, in cash, over time.

Stay in control of your assets in Chapter 13

The debtor proposes the plan, the debtor suggests the values, and the debtor can get out of bankruptcy if the case should take an unexpected and unwanted turn.

Debtor in control:  nothing to fear.

Future credit in doubt

The commercials that try to sell you some for-profit solution to your debt problem peddle fear.  They want you to think that you’ll never get credit again if you wipe out your debts in bankruptcy.

Or, they tell you, it will be 10 years before you can get credit.

Nonsense.

Bankruptcy makes you almost instantly a better credit risk than you were before you filed.  Huh?  It’s because there are fewer demands on your income.

Bankruptcy impacts the cost of credit.  Close in time to your filing, credit is more expensive.  All other things being equal, the increased cost of borrowing goes down as you get farther from the bankruptcy.

Credit heals with time

The availability of credit and its cost depends on many factors and no one can predict all of them for some unknown point in the future.

What is almost universally true is that, loaded with debt, you probably couldn’t get more credit now even if you didn’t file for bankruptcy.

Public exposure

Bankruptcy can seem like the modern day equivalent of the public stocks, where those who misbehaved were exposed to public ridicule.  That view of bankruptcy is mostly in your imagination.

Bankruptcy cases are in the public record, and anyone who wants to find out can find out.

But tell me, how much time do you spend figuring out which of your neighbors and coworkers have filed bankruptcy?

You would also be surprised at how many people, famous and anonymous, have filed bankruptcy.  They still have friends, homes, cars, jobs, and community respect.

Studies show that job loss, divorce, and illness account for a large percentage of debts leading to bankruptcy.

You won’t find yourself alone if you take the step to do something about your debt problem.

What's so scary about bankruptcy?Not so scary

So, savor the frightful and the scary on Halloween.

Don’t carry that false fear over into your financial life.

Bankruptcy is nothing to be afraid of.

Instead, be afraid of not fixing a problem that has a solution.

More

How to interview a bankruptcy lawyer

Which chapter of bankruptcy is best

Can you spot the myths about bankruptcy?

Image courtesy of insidethemagic.

The Worst Reason To Settle Debts Rather Than File Bankruptcy

By

settle or file bankruptcyThe guy with an old debt asked if bankruptcy or debt settlement would cause greater damage to his “credit”.

The money advice columnist gave the right answer to the wrong question.

She got it backwards. So did the man with the question.

She advised that bankruptcy was more damaging given that the nagging debts were already three years old and would drop off his credit report in four years, whereas bankruptcy would show for seven to ten years from the bankruptcy filing.

Right, assuming that your credit history is the important issue.

But your credit record is a sideshow in life.

Dealing with old debt

I would challenge the question the way the guy phrased the question in the first place.

When you look at the alternatives to debts you can’t pay, I think the first concern should be for your balance sheet.

Which of the alternatives makes you better off NOW, not when you want to incur more debt in the future.

For the man writing in about settling a $13,000 debt for $5,000, I would have a series of questions that didn’t center on his ability to get new credit.

  • How old are you?
  • Do you support others?
  • Do you have any emergency savings?
  • How are you doing on retirement savings?
  • Got health insurance?

If he is young, single, and employed with a bit of money in the bank, perhaps paying $5,000 to make eliminate a $13,000 debt is a good deal.

If he’s middle aged, supporting children or aged parents, and living paycheck to paycheck, I would be inclined to suggest there are better uses for $5000.  At the most basic level, put it in an IRA, and your creditors can’t take it.

If he’s approaching retirement and looking at a future of reduced income and with  little need for future credit, chances are that there are crying needs for that $5000 other than dealing with an old debt.

It’s not about the credit score

As you can see,settlement versus  bankruptcy is not just a matter of which impacts your credit record more negatively.

The decision needs to take in your ability to spend money on old debts when faced with current and future demands on your assets.

It’s all backwards to think that protecting your credit record is the central issue..

More

Credit heals

Better to keep paying or file bankruptcy

Shore up your defenses against debt collectors

Image courtesy of Flickr and Luke Montague. 

 

 

 

The Real Threat To Your Retirement Savings Isn’t Bankruptcy

By

face in mirrorYour retirement accounts are safe from your creditors.

California state law and federal bankruptcy law protect your savings for retirement held in recognized retirement vehicles from levy or lien.

But retirement savings are at risk.

Look in the mirror.

The biggest threat to your retirement account isn’t your creditors, it’s you.

You are usually the only person who can withdraw money from an IRA or take a loan against your 401(k).

And your creditors would be happy to press you until you think that’s a good way out of a financial bind.

It is almost always a wretched idea.

M.O. of a debt collector

Debt collection through the courts is relatively inefficient and costly to the creditor.

Law suits require lawyers, filing fees, and a chance for the person sued to fight back.  And even with a judgment, exemptions protect some assets from lien or levy by the creditor with a judgment.

How judgments work

How much better and cheaper if the creditor can “persuade” you to dip into an account that a creditor with a judgment couldn’t get to in order to pay the bill.

Toward that end, the debt collector will try

  • annoyance,
  • shame, or
  • fear

Whatever the method, they ratchet up the pressure until you think it’s smart to rob your retirement funds to solve today’s problem.

Are retirement savings ever the right answer

My instinctual answer is “no”.

But individuals and their situations are so varied that a flat no is probably too broad.

But only a bit.

The questions I’d ask myself before raiding retirement savings include

  • How much working life do I have left to replenish my retirement
  • Do I have an employer retirement plan to rely on
  • Do I have other assets with equity to supplement retirement
  • Is the bill to be paid with retirement savings just part of a bigger problem

The last question is probably the most important.  Is resort to retirement savings a one time solution, or is it just the first, or the most recent, indicator that your bills are bigger than your ability to repay them?

If so, it’s time to talk with a bankruptcy lawyer.  Understand what your options are.  Look at the big picture that includes all of your debts and all of your assets.

You can probably find a better solution.

Image courtesy of Steve Calcott. 

My thanks to Peter Mullison, whose post on retirement savings and bankruptcy sparked this perspective on the problem.

When to file bankruptcy

By

 

when to file bankruptcyShould I wait until all of my savings are gone to file bankruptcy?, the caller asked.

And he didn’t mean, until my net worth is greatly reduced; he meant, until my bank balance is zero.

One has to admire the resolve of those who propose to pay on debts that they can never repay up to the point where they literally have nothing.

My advice, of course, is “no”.

There is no point in making further payments when you can see you’re heading for bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy exemptions allow you to keep a collection of assets necessary for a fresh start.  In California, we have exemptions that will even shelter meaningful cash in the bank.

In Chapter 13, you can keep everything you own.

There is not even a requirement  that you be destitute or even insolvent to file bankruptcy.  You simply need to be willing to play by the rules of the bankruptcy chapter you choose.

Those rules are centered on making full financial disclosure.

When to consider bankruptcy

The short answer is probably now.  If you are reading this, you probably wonder if bankruptcy could help you out of a hole.  Instead of wondering, see a bankruptcy lawyer. (I’ll tell you a secret:  bankruptcy lawyers don’t bite.)

So often I wish clients had come to me earlier: before they borrowed against their retirement to pay credit cards; before they took bad home loans that imperil their home; before they borrowed from one credit card to pay on another.

Don’t take big financial steps til you see a lawyer

The right time to consider bankruptcy is when you suspect that you can’t really repay your debts in full in 3-5 years, on your own.

Or, when the stress of being in debt interferes with your health or your relationships.  Or, when you have no reserves should things get worse. 

Stress kills

Seeing a bankruptcy lawyer doesn’t commit you to filing.  It just arms you with information about what your options are.

Most people who see a good bankruptcy lawyer are surprised that bankruptcy relief is relatively simply and very effective for almost everyone.

Information is power….become more powerful.

Read on

Picking a bankruptcy lawyer

Alternatives to bankruptcy

What you keep through bankruptcy

 

 

 

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories