Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

Five Tax Tips For Two Cents

By

8328967338_37e260ff6b_h_optThe tax filing deadline approaches.

So why is a bankruptcy lawyer talking about taxes?

I’ve found over three decades as a bankruptcy lawyer that there’s a surprising degree of overlap between bankruptcy and tax .

All too often, it’s tax troubles that brings a family to me for help.

Here’s my two cents on what I know about taxes.  It’s not a lot, but what I know is both simple and critical.

File those tax returns

Lots of folks who end up in my office discussing bankruptcy held off filing their returns because they figured they couldn’t pay the tax that would be due.

Bad decision.

Without a return, taxes never die

The IRS will not descend on you the week after you file a return with tax due but no check.  They’re still opening envelops.

But filing a return gets all kinds of time periods running that may benefit you:  the 3 years til the taxes are dischargeable in bankruptcy;  the 10 years til the tax collection statute runs.

Whatever you do, don’t let the IRS file a tax return for you.

Don’t pay tax on discharged debt

If your debts were discharged in bankruptcy last year, that discharge has no tax consequences.

The Internal Revenue Code specifically excludes from taxable income any debts forgiven in bankruptcy.

Cancellation of debt is tax free

You may get a 1099 reporting the cancelled debt.  The creditor whose debt is forgiven is required to do so.

It’s up to you to assert that there’s an exception to tax.  And there’s an IRS form to rebut any tax consequences.  Get it and file it.

Claim deductions for Chapter 13 payments

If you’re in a Chapter 13 that catches up arrearages on real property loans, claim those payments as deductions of your own.  Just because the trustee writes the check, it’s still you paying the mortgage interest in that payment.

How to find and claim the deduction

The concept here goes beyond mortgage interest.  If the expense was deductible had you written the check, it’s deductible if the trustee pays it.

Get the trustee’s disbursement records in your case from  the trustee’s web site and get to deducting.

If you owe tax, fix your withholding

The return to be filed this spring can tell you if you are withholding enough money to pay your taxes.

If there’s a big number on the bottom line of the return for last year, and this year looks similar, increase your withholding now.

What Goldilocks knew about taxes

And if you think you can’t pay taxes as you go and support the rest of your living expenses, you need to look hard at the big picture.

It’s generally a poor decision to short the feds so you can pay AmEx or Visa.

Amend old returns if you missed something

If you missed a deduction or otherwise overpaid your taxes in a previous year, you have only three years to amend that return and claim a refund.

Time running out to claim prior year tax breaks

Lower income families often miss the fact that they get a tax credit (that’s real money, not just a deduction) under the Earned Income Tax Credit.  Find out if you are eligible.

More

Discharging taxes in bankruptcy

The tax filing extension can be dangerous

Wiping out tax liens

Title Isn’t Everything: Watch Out For The Assets In Your Spouse’s Name

By

community property surprise

But it belongs to my spouse, sputtered the hapless debtor at the bankruptcy hearing.

Not so, says the bankruptcy trustee.  It was purchased during marriage, wasn’t it?

And so, the trouble begins for those who don’t understand community property.

Turns out the debtor left out of his schedules the bank account in his wife’s name.  Ooops!

Which motivates a trustee to keep digging for what else was left out of the bankruptcy papers.  Not where you want to be.

Property character, community or separate, makes a difference because it determines what assets creditors of the spouses can reach.  And, it determines what property falls under the control of a bankruptcy trustee.

All of the community property of a marriage becomes property of the estate when one spouse files bankruptcy.

So the community or separate distinction matters not just in divorce, but it matters to those Californians who owe debts they can’t pay.

Property title doesn’t control

In a nutshell, if you are a married Californian, it doesn’t matter whose name is on the title.

  • Buy a car.
  • Buy a house.
  • Take out an insurance policy

No matter whose name is on the paper work, chances are it’s still community property of you and your spouse.

Because “stuff” acquired during marriage is presumed to be community property under California law.

A presumption in law means  legal inference that must be made in light of certain facts.  Most presumptions are rebuttable, meaning that they are rejected if proven to be false or at least thrown into sufficient doubt by the evidence.  

The legal inference that acquisitions during marriage are community can be rebutted with sufficient and convincing evidence.  But absent such evidence, the presumption of community stands.

So, the house bought during marriage whose title reads Jane Spouse is community property, not Jane’s separate property.  That means that Jim Spouse’s creditors can reach it to pay Jim’s debts.

Magic words make a difference

The words in the title documents can themselves be evidence of an asset’s character.

If you want an asset acquired during marriage to be the separate property of one spouse, the first step in overcoming the presumption of community is to take title like this:

Jane Spouse, a married woman as her sole and separate property

But courts have made it more difficult, because what if Jane buys something using community property and takes title as her separate property.  Maybe she’s trying to cheat her spouse out of his share of the community that was used to buy the asset.  If she bought it, how does a creditor or a bankruptcy trustee know that Jim Spouse agrees that it’s hers alone?

Changing the character of an asset is called transmutation.  California law requires transmutation to be accomplished in a writing, signed by both spouses.  Then others know that the deviation from the usual is OK with Jim.

Prenuptial agreement can kill community property

An agreement between the spouses made before marriage (a “prenuptial” agreement) defeats the presumption.

A prenuptial agreement often says “we won’t have community property”.  The agreement lays out who is the owner of each kind of asset.  It may reject the legal cases that give the community an interest in property that either spouse brings to the marriage.

Because a properly drafted prenuptial agreement is in writing and signed by the spouses, it passes muster to rebut the presumption of community property.

Then, title plus the prenuptial beats the community property presumption.

Image courtesy of Flickr  & Nathan Pilkington 

 

Your Right To Credit Reporting After Bankruptcy

By

 

credit report after bankruptcy

You’ve finished your Chapter 13 and emerged from bankruptcy with your home loan current.

But your credit report is a blank page as to your mortgage.

The mortgage servicer isn’t reporting your payments to the credit reporting agencies.  

Nothing. Nada.  Crickets.

So, even though you’re making regular payments, you’re not visibly rebuilding your credit.

Ask the servicer and they’ll tell you that they can’t report your payments “because of your bankruptcy discharge“.

But they are wrong:  a little-discussed provision of Chapter 13 says that long-term mortgage debt is not discharged in 13.

Yup.  The mortgage loan is not discharged as a personal obligation.

And therefore, there is no bar to the servicer reporting your payments, and every danger should they not report.

Servicer’s obligation to report

Put simply, if a creditor reported to credit reporting agencies before the bankruptcy was filed, then there is an obligation to report after the bankruptcy.  The “furnisher”, the creditor who supplies information to the credit reporting agency, has an obligation to make the information on file fully accurate.

In contrast to an unsecured debt like a credit card, which should be reported as having a zero balance after the discharge, the mortgage loan after Chapter 13 has a balance.

Presumably, it is also current.  Both facts which should appear on your credit report.

Mortgages excluded from Chapter 13 discharge

I’m certain you will have to cite to bankruptcy law when you challenge the improper reporting on a mortgage loan after Chapter 13.

Here’s the part of the Bankruptcy Code that excludes long term debt like your mortgage.

Section 1328 says,

(a)… the court shall grant the debtor a discharge of all debts provided for by the plan …, except any debt—

(1)provided for under section 1322(b)(5); 

The section that 1328 incorporates, Section 1322(b), says

(b)Subject to subsections (a) and (c) of this section, the plan may—

(5) … provide for the curing of any default within a reasonable time and maintenance of payments while the case is pending on any unsecured claim or secured claim on which the last payment is due after the date on which the final payment under the plan is due;

Get mortgage payments reported

If you find that your post discharge payments on your home loan aren’t being reported, challenge the accuracy of what is on your report about that loan with the credit reporting agency.

It is the CRA’s responsibility to see that information in your credit file is accurate.  The CRA is supposed to ask the furnisher to reinvestigate the challenged tradeline.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has a how-to, with a template letter, on how to dispute inaccurate information on your credit report.

Get the good information reported.

More

How to find and fix credit reporting errors

Your post bankruptcy to-do list

Do It Yourself Bankruptcy Software Is A Trap

By

bankruptcy trapGood intentions and a good education are apparently not enough for Upsolve to get the means test right.

Upsolve describes itself as a non-profit, created by Harvard Law School graduates, whose mission is to “help low-income Americans in financial distress get a fresh start through Chapter 7 bankruptcy at no cost.”

Admirable, so far.

Until you read this drivel about the means test.

When Congress changed the bankruptcy laws in 2005, income requirements were added to prevent bankruptcy abuse. You can file under Chapter 7, but if your income exceeds a certain amount in California, you are not eligible for a bankruptcy discharge.

Poppycock.  A good bankruptcy lawyer could tell you so in a heartbeat.

And yet,  someone with a heart beat wrote this promo for a piece of software. (“Software” wasn’t my first choice of words, here.)

Sadly, the public will be mislead to their detriment.

Means test misrepresented

The means test is a formula, not a table of income.  Even families with generous gross incomes pass the means test if their allowable expenses and the composition of their debt consumes that income.

Not everyone has to take the means test.

Whether you are above or below the median income is just the first sort.  Above median, you have to supply further information about your actual expenses for things beyond food, housing and transportation.

It’s your net income, according to the means test formula, that decides whether you are eligible for Chapter 7.

So, Upsolve’s statement that with a high income you can’t get a bankruptcy discharge is simply flat wrong.  And what’s the point of telling the public “you can file, but you can’t get a discharge”?

I have other bones to pick with Upsolve’s presentation about bankruptcy options and choice of chapter.  I’ve written about my take on those issues here and at Bankruptcy In Brief.  

For starters, the discussion of the choice between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 is shallow.  But hey, these people are peddling Chapter 7, so why muddy the waters with complexity.

Wrong remedy for real problem

Upsolve does address a genuine and serious aspect of bankruptcy law since “reform” in 2005. Bankruptcy law today is unnecessarily complex.

BAPCPA, touted as “abuse prevention”, succeeded only in making bankruptcy for most consumers more complex and much more expensive.  While those with business debt or unpaid taxes got a pass.

The consequences of errors in bankruptcy became more onerous.

Yet there is no evidence that “reform” (or “deform” as I liken it) lead to better outcomes for our economy as a whole.  The means test itself was predicated on a fabrication that high income individuals were abusing bankruptcy.

Pre-deform, I occasionally recommended to clients that they forgo a lawyer and file their case themselves.  No longer; it’s not safe.

But until the law is simplified, to suggest to average folks that a software program can guide them through the bankruptcy thicket is itself dangerous.

What recourse will bankruptcy filers have when the program oversimplifies, or the vocabulary or legal constructs is just beyond their understanding?

Let’s tackle the problems in the law such that it’s safe and inexpensive for families to file for bankruptcy the way they file their taxes.

 

Find The Right Cure for Your Debt Problems

By

Get-out-of- debt advice and sales pitches abound.

Like this one.

But no one tells you that you need a diagnosis of your financial ills before prescribing the cure.

Is the stomach ache indigestion or appendicitis?

Is it temporary upset or a life threatening money pit?

The answer makes a big difference in how you treat it.

No single prescription

A doctor treating your illness wants to know your age, your medical history, other medical conditions along with your symptoms.

Same sort of questions arise if debt is what ails you.

  • Age
  • Dependents
  • Current income
  • Assets
  • Debt total

All of those factors interact to shape a treatment plan for debt.

If you are on the cusp of retirement, you don’t have time to tackle big debt by cutting out frills in the budget.

If you are young, single, suitably employed, the prescription may be different.

So don’t take to heart every buckle-down-and-pay scheme you find on the internet.

Too little, too late

Most get-out-of-debt advice is better suited for living economically after you’ve solved the debt problem.

Fewer lattes, more eating at home, less entertainment spending.

Compare bankruptcy with payment plans

That may work to get out of debt if you have time, discipline, and modest debt to start with.

But the starting point is comparing your income to your debt, in light of your fixed expenses.

How big is the problem?  To bring it down, do you require a pellet gun or a bazooka?

How precarious are things

The final question is how risky is the treatment?

Think of the endless lists of common side effects and serious complications listed with every medicine you take.

When the ailment is debt, the risk is living with no reserves.  A recent study found 40% of Americans couldn’t pay for a $400 emergency without borrowing.

Four hundred dollars isn’t much in this economy.  Yet a $400 expense would imperil a huge swath of our citizens.

It’s easy to fool yourself into thinking that you aren’t likely to face an emergency.  Yet, look at this list of pretty mundane things that require a $500  fix.

None of those are so far fetched that they couldn’t happen to any of us.

So living without a financial safety net in order to pay of big debt is big-time risky.

Here’s a further discussion of  my diagnostic of your debt alternatives:  when to hold and when to fold.

 

 

The Debt You Thought Was Gone: When Old Liens Suddenly Appear

By

I Have Forgotten Something

What do you do when you discover a judgment lien long after you filed bankruptcy?

Your bankruptcy case is closed.

You’re recovering nicely.

Then you find there’s a judgment lien on your house that you didn’t know about.

And the law says that liens survive a bankruptcy case, unless the bankruptcy court orders otherwise.

Is there anything you can do to get rid of the lien?

Most likely, yes.

Can the lien be avoided

The debtor (that’s you, the person who filed the bankruptcy) can ask the bankruptcy court to void a lien on their property if

  • The debt existed when the bankruptcy case was first filed
  • The lien is a judgment lien
  • The property to which the lien attaches was claimed exempt
  • The property had too little value to pay any senior liens, the judgment lien, and your exemption

Let’s look at each requirement for an avoidable lien, found in Bankruptcy Code 522(f).

Predates the bankruptcy

Bankruptcy impacts only debts that predate the filing of the case.  That doesn’t mean that there has to be a default on the debt or a lawsuit filed.

But the events that create the debt have to have happened before the bankruptcy was filed:  you used the credit card;  you were involved in an accident; or you were transported by ambulance.

Your bankruptcy case potentially effects all debts arising before you filed.  But the legal rights involved can’t have arisen since your bankruptcy was filed.

Lien secures a judgment

Liens that can be wiped out because they impair exemptions must be judicial liens, that is a lien created by a lawsuit.

Voluntary liens, like mortgages and home equity lines of credit can’t be eliminated because they interfere with exemptions. This section of the law deals only with involuntary liens.

You can’t eliminate statutory liens, either.  Tax liens are created by statute.  They aren’t covered by this provision of the bankruptcy code.

Property was claimed exempt

Because this part of the law is focused on seeing that you get the full benefits of the exemptions you claimed, the property affected by the lien must have been claimed exempt.

Some courts will avoid a lien if the property in question could have been claimed exempt.

Lien frustrates claim of exemption

To meet this condition for avoidance, some math is required.

As of the day the case was originally filed, the value of the property then had to have been insufficient to pay the balance of any voluntary liens on the property, the exemption, and the lien you want to avoid.

It may be that the lien at issue is avoidable only in part, if the value of the house would pay mortgages and the exemption, and something beyond.

The fact that there is no value in excess of the voluntary liens doesn’t prevent you from avoiding the lien. It’s not an all or nothing thing.

Revisiting your case

So, what do you do when the lien is discovered well after your bankruptcy case is over?  Reopen the case, and ask the court to avoid the lien or liens that impair your exemption.

Your motion to reopen needs to tell the court what you want to achieve.  Usually, you attach your motion to avoid the lien to the motion to reopen the case.

Most courts will want you to pay a new filing fee, to pay for the new work the court is going to do.  You can ask that the fee be refunded, but usually, you’ll have to pay up front to get started.

This isn’t a new bankruptcy case. You aren’t endangering the financial recovery you’ve made since your bankruptcy.  You are revisiting the old case to take care of old business.

The lawyer who helped you with the original case can handle the lien avoidance, or you can engage another bankruptcy lawyer to accomplish this task.

When time is tight

The overlooked judgment lien usually pops up when you are ready to sell your home or to refinance it.

Often that means you are working to deadlines.

A motion to reopen and to avoid a lien is likely to take 45-60 days before you have a bankruptcy court order in hand, voiding the lien.

If you find yourself short of time, consider negotiating for the escrow to hold the money that would otherwise go to the holder of the lien when the deal closes, while you go back to bankruptcy court.

If you didn’t check the public record before you filed your bankruptcy case to check for judgment liens, do it now.  Don’t wait for a time crunch.

Thankfully, bankruptcy courts are accustomed to helping with the overlooked lien.

More

Tax liens after bankruptcy

What was discharged in my bankruptcy case

Stripping off mortgage liens

Post bankruptcy check list

Image: Fotolia.com

 

How Consumer Remedies Were Gutted By Little- Noticed Tax Code Changes

By

Tax code changes effective in 2018 inflicted a crippling blow to consumers who must sue to enforce their rights.  And few have yet noticed.

The tax deduction for miscellaneous itemized deductions under IRC Section 212 is gone. So now, consumers who prevail under statutes that award attorneys fees to the successful plaintiff are denied a deduction for the legal expense of winning that victory.

The income is taxed but the cost of producing that income is no longer deductible.

So, a large hunk of a consumer’s recovery goes, not to the injured consumer, but to the IRS.  Or even, all of a consumer’s judgment is consumed by taxes.

What happened to consumer litigants

IRC Section 212  has long allowed individuals to deduct the ordinary and necessary expenses incurred to produce income. At least partially.

That is, until the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed December, 2017, including this zinger:

Notwithstanding subsection (a), no miscellaneous itemized deduction shall be allowed for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026.  Section 67(g)

So the deduction for the expense of producing income as a miscellaneous itemized deduction for individual tax payers vanished.  Poof.

The rational for its removal sounds great:

“Not that many taxpayers itemize their deductions so the deduction(s) won’t be missed.”

And thus, a bedrock principle of taxation, that the expenses of producing that income is deductible before tax is imposed, was cast aside.  With dire consequences for consumer rights, whether intended or not.

Tax changes abound

Miscellaneous itemized deductions weren’t the only victims of the 2017 tax act. HUGE things happened in the world of taxation on Jan  1, 2018 when the tax bill became effective.

For good or ill, perhaps wholly or partially dependent on your politics, the practical world of untold millions of individual taxpayers changed radically.

  • What would be alimony and heretofore deductible isn’t. (At least for most January 1, 2018 divorces.)
  • One very important protection afforded for debt relief from the disposition of a personal residence lapsed and has not been resuscitated.

There are many others.

But the devastation inflicted by Section 67(g) was initially far from obvious. It typically doesn’t become clear  until it’s time to file a federal tax return.

What had been a longtime method for getting at least some deduction for real expenses is gone.

Gone…

But thereby hangs a tale. Most taxpayers don’t itemize UNTIL THEY NEED TO DO SO. Now they can’t. Not even a little. And it gets much worse.

The power to tax….

The deduction allowed by  under IRC 212 prior to 2018 was already a ludicrously constructed monkey-motion system.  Lawsuit recoveries are typically reportable to the recipient in the GROSS recovery amount without diminution for attorneys’ fees payable to the attorney(s) whose services were indispensable in creating the income,

In order to get any deduction for attorneys fees paid, IRC Section 67 mandated:

The miscellaneous itemized deductions for any taxable year shall be allowed only to the extent that the aggregate of such deductions exceeds 2 percent of adjusted gross income.

This calculation often results in a sizeable bite coming out of the deduction the hapless taxpayer ultimately gets to take.

Now after Jan. 1, 2018, there is no deduction at all.

Picture the average non-itemizing single parent taxpayer suing for wrongful termination under this new tax regime.

  • The legal pushback from the errant employer is fierce and attorneys’ fees on both sides are high.
  • The settlement calls for $500,000 to be paid to the plaintiff .and,
  •  40% of the recovery goes to the plaintiff’s attorney as fees.

In the typical course of things post Jan 1, 2018, the plaintiff will be taxed on the FULL $500,000 recovery. Plaintiff gets NO deduction for the $200,000 in attorneys’ fees paid. None…

The plaintiff walks away (limps away actually) having paid taxes on AT LEAST $500,000 of income out of the $300,000 of money they actually net. (Yes, the attorney then pays tax on the $200,000 already included in the plaintiff’s income.)

Kinda discourages injured individuals from using consumer protection laws to protect themselves, doesn’t it?

Statutory penalties without deduction

If you perhaps think this isn’t so bad, picture the many hundreds of thousands of suits brought where the plaintiff is entitled to a fixed fee, fine or other relatively low statutory amount.

The purpose of these consumer lawsuits is to promote regulation of activities like as an example, lending-related abuses. In these cases the state consumer laws providing for the suits often allow the attorneys for the plaintiff to collect their fees from the lender or other business.

These suits now regularly result in the plaintiff being in deep debt to the IRS with insufficient funds to pay even the tax. AKA: Tax Hell.

Without direct decisive legislative change this horrendous damage will play out across the country for years.

It will continue until the right people suffer from its effects. Only then will there be any change(s).

 

 

 

5 Essential Tips To Understand Your Mortgage Loan

By

 

mortgage debt

Figuring out what you owe on your home loan can be harder than a calculus exam.

For most people, their mortgage is their biggest debt.  And their home is their most important asset.

Yet, the people accounting for your payments are increasingly incapable of the very basics of their job.  And that makes your job, as borrower and homeowner, more challenging.

Not your parents’ home loan

Things have changed since the local bank made you a loan to buy a house and collected the payments you made on that loan.

Now, home loans get sold to someone else the moment the deal closes.  The right to collect the loan payments is bought and sold separately from the right to the payment amount.

And increasingly, the servicers make mistakes as they cut  corners to make a buck.

What do you need to know to assess whether your loan servicer has got the numbers right?

1.  Principal balance isn’t what you owe

Ask someone what they owe on their mortgage and they’ll recite the principal balance.  The principal balance is the remaining part of the amount originally borrowed that is still unpaid.

Yet you may well owe additional sums:  delinquent payments that are mostly interest;  late fees;  escrow advances; or the junk fees that most delinquent loans are larded with.

Finding the principal balance gets trickier yet if the loan has been modified to include a non-interest bearing amount or some other, non standard adjustment.

So the amount necessary to pay off the loan upon sale, or refinance, may well include charges from the past plus fees for calculating what you need to pay to satisfy the debt.

2.  Payments are credited to oldest month unpaid

If you fall behind on a home loan, then resume making payments, your payment is credited to the oldest month still unpaid.

So the payment you make in June may be credited to February.

And the servicer will report that you remain due for June, even though you sent a check in June.  It’s all in the rules about how payments are credited under the terms of the note.

3.  Payments may not be credited

Loan servicers seem to have a separate “pocket” labeled “Suspense”  into which they sometimes dump your payment. They’ve got your money, they just haven’t credited it to the amount you owe.

The only reason for putting funds in suspense that seems justified is when the payment is too little to make a full payment on the loan.  Servicers don’t have to credit partial payments.

So, they put the money in suspense until they receive enough money to make the regular payment.

For reasons no servicer has ever adequately explained, I’ve seen suspense accounts in the tens or even a hundred thousand dollars.

So, a mortgage statement that doesn’t address any funds held in suspense doesn’t tell the whole story.

4.  Escrow accounts contain something extra

If your property taxes and hazard insurance are paid by the lender, you have an escrow account.

Under federal law, the lender is allowed to collect more than the sum of the year’s taxes and insurance as protection against the borrower’s non payment.

The extra money, the “cushion”, can be no more than 1/6 th of the annual expenditures.  It remains your money, it’s just held by the servicer should it have to pay when you haven’t paid.

You should get an annual escrow analysis that shows income and expenses in the past year’s escrow account and a projection of the coming year’s expenses.

That projection will determine what you pay in escrow payments going forward.

5.  Statement doesn’t come from owner of note

Ever since loans were bundled up and sold on Wall Street to investment trusts, the work of collecting your payments has been handed off to loan “servicers”.

The owner of the note pays a company to deposit your payments, keep track of fees and expenses, and take action if you don’t pay.

The servicer seldom owns the note, they just own the right to collect the money.

And servicers change.  Sometimes as often as we change the oil in our car.

When there’s a loan handoff from one servicer to a new servicer, details about anything unusual in the loan account sometimes get lost.

Get behind the monthly statement

The problem of finding out what the servicer thinks you owe became such a problem that regulations written pursuant to the Dodd-Frank act gave borrowers some clout.

Now, a borrower with a home loan can make a Request For Information about their loan and expect answers within a shorter period than under the old law.

If the servicing of the loan has changed hands, the borrower has a window in which to request information from the old servicer, to compare with what the new servicer thinks.

Find the “how-to” for a Request for Information.

More

Your mortgage and your credit report after Chapter 13

Bad mortgage accounting violates your Chapter 13 discharge

Get tax credit for curing mortgage defaults in Chapter 13

How Chapter 13 works

 

 

 

 

 

How to Screw Up Your Bankruptcy

By

animals-985500_1280_opt

If an asset isn’t titled to you,  it does not have to be disclosed in a bankruptcy filing.

I hear it and see it in action again and again.

If it isn’t titled to you, it will be “safe” from the bankruptcy trustee and from creditors.

And yet it is wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Still, people transfer titles to cars and cash and quitclaim their homes to friends before bankruptcy, thinking that’s smart.

No.  It’s both dumb and dangerous.

Not only does putting your assets in the names of friends and family expose them to a lawsuit to recover the property, in extreme situations it puts your bankruptcy discharge at risk.

Actions taken to “hinder, delay or defraud” creditors are grounds for denial of discharge under 11 U.S.C. 727.

What could delay your creditors more than shedding assets without getting anything in return?

Transferring asset unlawful since Elizabeth I

Queen_Elizabeth_I_of_England_Wellcome_V0048338 (1)_optFor well more than four hundred years, the law has contained prohibitions on fraudulent transfers.

A transfer of an asset by one who has debts constitutes a fraud on creditors if

1) the transfer is for less that fair consideration; or

2) was made for the purpose of putting the asset beyond the reach of creditors; or

3) leaves the person transferring the asset with less capital than reasonably necessary to conduct their business.

So, a transfer is actionable even if it’s a gift to charity; you intended to hide the asset; or the transfer left you broke.

Consequences of fraudulent transfer

The usual remedy against the person who gets the asset is  an order requiring the return of the asset or a money judgment in the amount of its value.

The bankruptcy code has a statute empowering the recapture of transfers made within two years of filing.

In addition, the bankruptcy trustee has the rights of the debtor’s creditors under state law to recovery any property that the debtor wrongfully transferred.  In California, creditors have four years to recover fraudulent transfers.

Putting your assets in someone else’s name

So, a really quick and effective way to screw up your bankruptcy is to put your assets in the name of your mother, your kids, or your buddy, and conceal the fact from your attorney.

Sign the statement of affairs under penalty of perjury, hiding the transfer, and you are a long way toward making a real muck of things.

Yet people again and again ask “what if I put it in someone else’s name?”.

As long as they ask me, I get a chance to say “Don’t do it”.

And they have a chance to get a discharge.

More

What your bankruptcy lawyer can’t tell you

Bankruptcy’s 90 day rule

Do it yourself bankruptcy

 

Queen E. The First courtesy of Wellcome and Wikimedia.

The Tax Deduction No One Tells You About

By

Money on the tableDid you file Chapter 13 to save your house from foreclosure?

Making payments to the trustee to catch up on the mortgage?

If you haven’t claimed a tax deduction for the bankruptcy plan payments that go to the lender, you’re leaving money on the table.

That’s money that fattens Uncle Sam’s coffers at the expense of your own.

You don’t really want to do that, do you?

Mortgage interest deduction

If your Chapter 13 plan is getting you current on your home mortgage, the plan is funneling a part of each month’s Chapter 13 payment to the lender.

Missed mortgage payment are largely interest, unless you are years in to a fully amortized loan.  So when your Chapter 13 plan proposes to get current on the loan through payments to the Chapter 13 plan, you’re proposing to pay the interest due.

The tax benefit in homeownership revolves around the fact that mortgage interest is deductible if you itemize your deductions.  Interest paid reduces the income on which you pay tax.

And, you don’t forfeit that tax benefit when you file Chapter 13.

Yet, for reasons I cannot explain, mortgage lenders seem to have gotten a pass on the reporting requirements that govern non bankruptcy payment of interest.  They don’t report to the IRS and to you, the ultimate payor, the interest paid through the bankruptcy plan by means of a 1098 form.

Find the deductible interest

To claim your deduction, you’ll have to dig a bit.  All Chapter 13 trustees now have websites where you can access a report about distributions made to creditors by the trustee.

You may have to figure out whether the proof of claim for the mortgage loan was filed by the original lender or by the servicer, or sometimes by the trustee of the Wall Street trust that owns the note.

Step by step instructions to calculate mortgage interest paid by the trustee

The claim usually stands out because it will include the total balance owed on the loan.

Buried in that mass of numbers will be the amount paid to the mortgage lender.

Make sure to print out the reports that show the amount.  Since the IRS didn’t get a copy of a 1098 showing payment of mortgage interest from the lender, you may have to back it up from your files.

Deadline to amend back returns looms

If you’ve been in your plan for several years, think not just about the return due soon.  Consider amending earlier returns to claim the deduction, and get a refund of what you overpaid in taxes.

You get three years from when you filed the tax return to amend it.  The IRS has a handy, dandy fact sheet on amending returns.

Don’t leave your money on the table for Uncle Sam.  Claim that deduction.

Image courtesy of Flickr and TracyO

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories