Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

Title Isn’t Everything: Watch Out For The Assets In Your Spouse’s Name

By

community property surprise

But it belongs to my spouse, sputtered the hapless debtor at the bankruptcy hearing.

Not so, says the bankruptcy trustee.  It was purchased during marriage, wasn’t it?

And so, the trouble begins for those who don’t understand community property.

Turns out the debtor left out of his schedules the bank account in his wife’s name.  Ooops!

Which motivates a trustee to keep digging for what else was left out of the bankruptcy papers.  Not where you want to be.

Property character, community or separate, makes a difference because it determines what assets creditors of the spouses can reach.  And, it determines what property falls under the control of a bankruptcy trustee.

All of the community property of a marriage becomes property of the estate when one spouse files bankruptcy.

So the community or separate distinction matters not just in divorce, but it matters to those Californians who owe debts they can’t pay.

Property title doesn’t control

In a nutshell, if you are a married Californian, it doesn’t matter whose name is on the title.

  • Buy a car.
  • Buy a house.
  • Take out an insurance policy

No matter whose name is on the paper work, chances are it’s still community property of you and your spouse.

Because “stuff” acquired during marriage is presumed to be community property under California law.

A presumption in law means  legal inference that must be made in light of certain facts.  Most presumptions are rebuttable, meaning that they are rejected if proven to be false or at least thrown into sufficient doubt by the evidence.  

The legal inference that acquisitions during marriage are community can be rebutted with sufficient and convincing evidence.  But absent such evidence, the presumption of community stands.

So, the house bought during marriage whose title reads Jane Spouse is community property, not Jane’s separate property.  That means that Jim Spouse’s creditors can reach it to pay Jim’s debts.

Magic words make a difference

The words in the title documents can themselves be evidence of an asset’s character.

If you want an asset acquired during marriage to be the separate property of one spouse, the first step in overcoming the presumption of community is to take title like this:

Jane Spouse, a married woman as her sole and separate property

But courts have made it more difficult, because what if Jane buys something using community property and takes title as her separate property.  Maybe she’s trying to cheat her spouse out of his share of the community that was used to buy the asset.  If she bought it, how does a creditor or a bankruptcy trustee know that Jim Spouse agrees that it’s hers alone?

Changing the character of an asset is called transmutation.  California law requires transmutation to be accomplished in a writing, signed by both spouses.  Then others know that the deviation from the usual is OK with Jim.

Prenuptial agreement can kill community property

An agreement between the spouses made before marriage (a “prenuptial” agreement) defeats the presumption.

A prenuptial agreement often says “we won’t have community property”.  The agreement lays out who is the owner of each kind of asset.  It may reject the legal cases that give the community an interest in property that either spouse brings to the marriage.

Because a properly drafted prenuptial agreement is in writing and signed by the spouses, it passes muster to rebut the presumption of community property.

Then, title plus the prenuptial beats the community property presumption.

Image courtesy of Flickr  & Nathan Pilkington 

 

What This Lawyer Is Grateful For At Thanksgiving

By

lawyer gives thanks

This Thanksgiving, I’m grateful for the American judiciary and, particularly, for district court judges.

In these turbulent political times, they’ve been confronted with hard questions arising out of swirling controversies. Their rulings would have national implications.

Decisions were needed on short notice.  Partisans gathered on the sidelines, some assured of being bitterly disappointed however the decision came down.

Yet, it seems that they have come through in the finest tradition of the law.  My view of the question didn’t always prevail.  But I never doubted that their decision was reached after thoughtful analysis of the law and the arguments, independent of the views of the party responsible for their elevation to the bench.

I’m grateful, too, for the lawyers who’ve explained Constitutional principles and the supremacy of the law to nonlawyers.  Even as a lawyer, I’ve found myself pulling out my pocket version of the Constitution and looking at exactly how those bedrock provisions were written.

My fellow lawyers have largely made me proud.

 

 

Give More Than Thanks

By

share at Thanksgiving

Ever feel the disconnect between buying your groceries for the Thanksgiving meal, then dropping some loose change into the kettle for the needy?

Lots for my family, but leftovers for those who are hungry

That seems to be the message.

Those of us who are prospering are doing well, but lots of neighbors and elders struggle mightily.  Food insecurity is everywhere.

One in six Americans goes hungry.   The average Social Security check is less than $1300 a month, for instance. Families with children struggle even more than elders.

So, I write a check to my local food bank equal to my spending on my family’s Thanksgiving dinner.

I challenge you to do the same.

It’s one day and one check.  But for that day,  there can be parity between what we give ourselves and what we give others.

It is inexcusable and callous that there are hungry kids around us. Your loose change isn’t going to make much of a dent.

Take up the challenge and give more than thanks at Thanksgiving. Give dollar for dollar.

Then let’s devote ourselves to implementing solutions to pervasive hunger in a country so rich.

Does THIS Violate My Bankruptcy Discharge?

By

discharge violation

The bankruptcy discharge is the goal of bankruptcy.

Having been through the financial wringer and having been proactive to get out from under old bills,  debtors hope for a tranquil and prosperous life after bankruptcy.

Then, life intervenes.

  • A debt buyer calls demanding payment
  • Discharged debt remains on the credit report
  • The IRS levies your bank account
  • Your wheels are repossessed
  • Foreclosure threatens a deficiency judgment

So, just what behavior on the part of your creditors, or former creditors, violates the bankruptcy judge’s order that your debts are discharged?

What was discharged

We’ve got to start with the question of what was really discharged.

Not all creditors get discharged in bankruptcy.

Further,  the discharge wipes out your personal liability, but not necessarily creditor liens on your assets.

And the discharge order itself is useless in telling what was discharged.

So, here’s what your former creditors can and can’t do once you get your discharge.

Bankruptcy discharge no-no’s

Zombie debt back from the dead

In a world where disappointed creditors sell their uncollectable debt to debt buyers, debt wiped out in bankruptcy is often included in the sale.

But all too often, the debt buyer gets nothing that tells him about the bankruptcy discharge.

Thankfully, the debt buyer gets no better rights than the seller had.  If it was discharged when the seller owned it, it remains discharged in the hands of the buyer.

And while innocent efforts to collect discharged debt are still prohibited, you won’t get much relief from a bankruptcy judge unless the debt buyer is told the debt is discharged and then persists.

Then, you have a suit for sanctions.

Liens after bankruptcy

Unless the bankruptcy judge voids a lien, a secured creditor’s interest in your pre bankruptcy assets survives the discharge.

The tricky thing is that, after bankruptcy, the creditor can only enforce its claim to the asset.  It can’t get a judgment against you for any shortfall.

And, its letters and lawsuits in connection with enforcing its lien rights can’t threaten a judgment against you, or claim that you are liable for its attorneys fees or other collection costs.

Many discharge violation suits are successful against secured lenders because lenders are careless about what their form letters say about their rights and your obligations.

Debt you reaffirmed

Car lenders got special, advantageous treatment in the 2005 bankruptcy “reform” act.

After bankruptcy, it is no longer enough to keep paying on your car loan.  Just the bankruptcy discharge itself is a default of the loan terms.  Gotcha!

So, to make doubly certain that the car lender doesn’t pick up the car because of your discharge, debtors reaffirm the debt.  The car is then safe from repossession.

But fall behind on the reaffirmed debt, and it’s as if you’d never filed bankruptcy as to this debt.  The lender can, lawfully, repo the car and sue you for the difference.

Community property gets a discharge

Debtors in community property states get an extra measure of protection from the bankruptcy discharge.  Even when only one spouse gets a discharge, all of the community property is forever protected from the discharged community debts.

Can’t tell you how often creditors violate the community property discharge.  But they do, it’s wrong, and it can be expensive to the bungling creditor.  One of my clients effectively got a $400,000 benefit from a creditor’s violation of §524.

Mortgage servicing screwups

In a rare gift to consumers, the 2005 bankruptcy amendments made it a violation of the discharge for a mortgage servicer to fail to properly credit payments made on a home loan during a Chapter 13.

(i) The willful failure of a creditor to credit payments received under a plan confirmed under this title, unless the order confirming the plan is revoked, the plan is in default, or the creditor has not received payments required to be made under the plan in the manner required by the plan (including crediting the amounts required under the plan), shall constitute a violation of an injunction under subsection (a)(2) if the act of the creditor to collect and failure to credit payments in the manner required by the plan caused material injury to the debtor.  § 524(i)

This remedy is limited to payments “received under a plan”…. so we’re talking about Chapter 11, 12, or most likely Chapter 13.

Another reason I love Chapter 13.

What doesn’t violate the discharge

Credit reporting errors

Most bankruptcy courts have held that failures to properly report discharged debt to credit reporting agencies doesn’t constitute a violation of the discharge injunction.

It might well violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act, but absent facts showing improper reporting intended to collect a discharged debt, it’s not a favored complaint in bankruptcy court.

Failure to foreclose

Underwater property or junker cars are the bane of debtor’s existence.  And despite the necessity to file a notice of intentions concerning assets securing debt, checking the surrender box on the bankruptcy form doesn’t make the property someone else’s.

Secured creditors can sit on their hands, and their rights, apparently unchecked, under our law, and the collateral continues to belong to the debtor after bankruptcy.

Collection against guarantors

The discharge is unique to the person who filed bankruptcy.  You may discharge your personal liability on a debt, but if someone else is also liable on the debt, that liability lives on despite your bankruptcy discharge.

Protecting cosignors with Chapter 13

Collection of debts not discharged

And, of course, if the debt wasn’t discharged in the bankruptcy case, it remains collectible after the case is over.

The automatic stay may temporarily prevent collection, but once the stay is dissolved, by the debtor’s discharge or the closing of the case, a creditor whose claim survives is free to collect according to state law.

Stand up for your rights

Get full measure from your bankruptcy discharge.  If you think that creditors are violating your discharge, get legal help.

Too many debtors endure discharge violations without fighting back.

More

How to enforce your discharge

5 Essential Tips To Understand Your Mortgage Loan

By

 

mortgage debt

Figuring out what you owe on your home loan can be harder than a calculus exam.

For most people, their mortgage is their biggest debt.  And their home is their most important asset.

Yet, the people accounting for your payments are increasingly incapable of the very basics of their job.

Things have changed since the local bank made you a loan to buy a house and collected the payments you made on that loan.

Now, home loans get sold to someone else the moment the deal closes.  The right to collect the loan payments is bought and sold separately from the right to the payment amount.

And increasingly, the servicers make mistakes as they cut  corners to make a buck.

What do you need to know to assess whether your loan servicer has got the numbers right?

1.  Principal balance isn’t what you owe

Ask someone what they owe on their mortgage and they’ll recite the principal balance.  The principal balance is the remaining part of the amount originally borrowed that is still unpaid.

Yet you may well owe additional sums:  delinquent payments that are mostly interest;  late fees;  escrow advances; or the junk fees that most delinquent loans are larded with.

Finding the principal balance gets trickier yet if the loan has been modified to include a non-interest bearing amount or some other, non standard adjustment.

So the amount necessary to pay off the loan upon sale, or refinance, may well include charges from the past plus fees for calculating what you need to pay to satisfy the debt.

2.  Payments are credited to oldest month unpaid

If you fall behind on a home loan, then resume making payments, your payment is credited to the oldest month still unpaid.

So the payment you make in June may be credited to February.

And the servicer will report that you remain due for June, even though you sent a check in June.  It’s all in the rules about how payments are credited under the terms of the note.

3.  Payments may not be credited

Loan servicers seem to have a separate “pocket” labeled “Suspense”  into which they sometimes dump your payment. They’ve got your money, they just haven’t credited it to the amount you owe.

The only reason for putting funds in suspense that seems justified is when the payment is too little to make a full payment on the loan.  Servicers don’t have to credit partial payments.

So, they put the money in suspense until they receive enough money to make the regular payment.

For reasons no servicer has ever adequately explained, I’ve seen suspense accounts in the tens or even a hundred thousand dollars.

So, a mortgage statement that doesn’t address any funds held in suspense doesn’t tell the whole story.

4.  Escrow accounts contain something extra

If your property taxes and hazard insurance are paid by the lender, you have an escrow account.

Under federal law, the lender is allowed to collect more than the sum of the year’s taxes and insurance as protection against the borrower’s non payment.

The extra money, the “cushion”, can be no more than 1/6 th of the annual expenditures.  It remains your money, it’s just held by the servicer should it have to pay when you haven’t paid.

You should get an annual escrow analysis that shows income and expenses in the past year’s escrow account and a projection of the coming year’s expenses.

That projection will determine what you pay in escrow payments going forward.

5.  Statement doesn’t come from owner of note

Ever since loans were bundled up and sold on Wall Street to investment trusts, the work of collecting your payments has been handed off to loan “servicers”.

The owner of the note pays a company to deposit your payments, keep track of fees and expenses, and take action if you don’t pay.

The servicer seldom owns the note, they just own the right to collect the money.

And servicers change.  Sometimes as often as we change the oil in our car.

When there’s a loan handoff from one servicer to a new servicer, details about anything unusual in the loan account sometimes get lost.

Get behind the monthly statement

The problem of finding out what the servicer thinks you owe became such a problem that regulations written pursuant to the Dodd-Frank act gave borrowers some clout.

Now, a borrower with a home loan can make a Request For Information about their loan and expect answers within a shorter period than under the old law.

If the servicing of the loan has changed hands, the borrower has a window in which to request information from the old servicer, to compare with what the new servicer thinks.

Find the “how-to” for a Request for Information.

More

Your mortgage and your credit report after Chapter 13

Bad mortgage accounting violates your Chapter 13 discharge

Get tax credit for curing mortgage defaults in Chapter 13

How Chapter 13 works

 

 

 

 

 

4 Keys To Chapter 13 Success

By

successful Chapter 13

How do I make a Chapter 13 plan that succeeds?

That’s important because a successful Chapter 13 lets you

keep your assets,

keep control of your income, and

discharge more debts than any other form of bankruptcy.

Yet a distressing number of Chapter 13’s fail before they reach the finish line.

Debtor writes the plan

One powerful characteristic of Chapter 13 is that the debtor writes the payment plan.

How Chapter 13 works

Not the judge, not the trustee, not some anonymous “they”.  You.

The court must confirm it, but creditors don’t have to like it or support it for it to become the order of the court.

The plan sets out how much money you will pay in every month, and tells the trustee whom to pay with that money.

So,  how do you craft a plan that you can follow and will get you to your goals?  What plan elements increase the odds of success?

1.  Don’t overreach

Biting off too much to chew (or really, to pay) dooms more Chapter 13 plans than anything else in the debtor’s control.

And that usually comes down to trying to save a house with a loan badly in arrears. Or, keeping a vehicle with a huge unpaid balance.

Bankruptcy allows you to choose whether to continue paying on debts secured by things you own.  Chapter 13 differs from Chapter 7 in that it provides you protection from creditors and a space to catch up on secured debts that are delinquent.

But some other debts must, by law, be paid in Chapter 13.  Child support and recent taxes are the two most frequent examples.  Those debts have a  priority under the law, and must be paid in full through the plan.

Since secured debts are usually paid first by the Chapter 13 trustee, the first dollars into your plan pay for those secured debts you choose to pay.

If  later you are unable to fund the plan, you can find yourself tossed out of bankruptcy, still behind on house and car, AND owing the feds and your ex.

Sometimes, the most valuable thing a bankruptcy provides is a chance to walk away from deals you can’t afford any longer.

2.  Be real about the cost of living

Bankruptcy is unlike many kinds  of legal representation where you can hand the problem to a lawyer and go on about your life.

Not in Chapter 13.

Chapter 13 requires that you help your lawyer present a budget for the life of your plan that is realistic.  Nothing good comes of estimating that you can feed a family of four on $200/month, or that you can operate an older car for just the price of gas.

Make unrealistic assumptions about ongoing living expenses, so that the plan appears to work, just pushes the next crisis a bit down the road.

Think about the real cost of running your house and nurturing your family.  Make provisions in the projected budget for those expenses that come around but not on a monthly schedule.

3.  Opt for automatic payments

Have your Chapter 13 payment automatically deducted from your paycheck, or your bank account, and you stand a far better chance of completing your plan.

It’s simply easier to look at what’s in the account and spend what’s available than it is to spend such that enough is left to make the Chapter 13 payment.

‘Nuff said.

4.  Cling to a capable lawyer

Your bankruptcy lawyer is yours for the duration of the plan.  Stay in touch.

Before there’s a crisis, or even a change that cramps your ability to make plan payments, pick up the phone.  Tell your lawyer what you’re facing.

Be proactive in solving problems before those problems prompt the Chapter 13 trustee to dismiss your case.

You may be eligible to reduce your payments, to surrender the collateral for some debt, or to suspend payments for a while.

If not, your choices may include converting to Chapter 7,  asking for a hardship discharge, or simply voluntarily dismissing your case.

Your lawyer can help you figure out which of the options works best for you.

Most problems in Chapter 13 are solved more effectively and more cheaply when you are proactive in facing those problems early.

Don’t be a stranger to your lawyer.

More

How to interview a bankruptcy lawyer

Why I love Chapter 13

If your Chapter 13 is in trouble

 

 

 

 

What The Fool Got Wrong About Filing Bankruptcy

By

should I file bankruptcyThe famous poem begins, “how do I love thee? let me count the ways”.

But what if it’s not love that we are counting, but loathing?

Let me count the ways I loathe the Motley Fool’s article asking should I file for bankruptcy?

The underlying assumption is that people in debt flock to bankruptcy as an “easy way out”, and damage their credit score for seven years or more.

This is so wrong, where do I start?

Who files bankruptcy

No one I’ve met in 38 years as a bankruptcy lawyer arrived in my office on a whim to make their financial life easier with a “get-out-of-jail-free” card.

Instead, they’ve agonized about even considering bankruptcy.  They feel guilty and ashamed. 

Why  creditors want them to feel guilty, ashamed and fearful about bankruptcy.

Often, they’ve delayed learning about bankruptcy so long that they’ve made their situation even worse.  Not only has their financial situation worsened while they tried to find a way to pay, but their health and their relationships have deteriorated.

The most common triggers for financial distress are job loss; illness; business failure; and divorce.  None are exactly choices made frivolously.

Drowning in debt

The premise of the Fool’s article is that you are up to your eyeballs in bills.  If that’s your situation, the remedies the author proposes are band-aids on a gut wound.

  • Get a second job
  • Cut your living expenses
  • Negotiate with your creditors

All of these suggestions are sound, standing alone.  But they are inadequate remedies for someone truly drowning in debt.

If the rising water is at your knees, fine.  These might work.  But if the water’s at your chin, this is fantasy.

And all of them are offered without discussion of the age, health and family situation of the person in debt.  Neither does the author address the size of the debt and the time required to pay off the debt.   Much less, discuss the ongoing interest on the unpaid balance.

Realities of negotiating with creditors

The logic of a creditor settling for less than is owed, rather than get nothing in bankruptcy, is rock solid.  Only, little logic is found in the collection departments of most creditors.

They’ve heard the threat to file bankruptcy before.  It doesn’t phase them.

And the people you can get on the phone to discuss a reduction in the debt generally don’t have the authority to make the deal, much less the vision to see the benefits of a deal.

Debts get easier to settle the older and stinkier they get.  So, stop paying for long enough and some creditors will come to the negotiating table.

But getting all your creditors to reduce their claims is nearly impossible.

And there’s no discussion of where you’re going to get the money to pay off the reduced debt, nor the time to engage creditors in negotiations.

Protecting the credit score

The utter irony of the Fool’s approach is that you should avoid bankruptcy to protect your credit score!  Truly foolish.

Your credit score is an arbitrary and unregulated construct, created by businesses working for creditors, to measure the cost to you of incurring more debt.

Granted, it’s now used in other enterprises for which it wasn’t designed, and, I would argue, not particularly predictive of whether you’ll pay your rent, for instance, or commit insurance fraud.

Isn’t the point of discussing bankruptcy alternatives to get you out of debt?  Not enable you to get into more debt?

Unaddressed is the current impact of repayment strategies on your credit score.  Suppose to get a creditor to negotiate, you have to stop paying altogether, so they see that your situation is dire.

There’s a hit to your credit score, right there.

And the score won’t begin to improve until all that’s behind you.  No discussion by the Fool of how long that may take.

Living on a financial knife edge

Personal finance writers all tout saving.  Whether it’s an emergency reserve or retirement savings, no ethical financial expert proposes that you spend every penny you have, with nothing in reserve.

Yet the Fool omits any assessment of whether the money spent paying off old debts would be better off creating a financial cushion, which would be possible after a bankruptcy discharge.

My bankruptcy clients too often have neither savings, nor health insurance, nor health care.  I suggest that a better future requires those things, not a robust credit score.

Bankruptcy misrepresented

Finally, the Fool repeats myths about bankruptcy.

The author claims that “your major assets are sold off” in Chapter 7.

Nonsense. Nearly 98% of Chapter 7’s result in no loss of the filer’s assets.

Between exemptions and the lack of real equity, most people in bankruptcy don’t have assets that are saleable by a bankruptcy trustee.

Chapter 13 is a repayment plan, but that plan may pay little or nothing to creditors, depending on your income, living expenses, or the equity in your assets after a deduction for exemptions.

How Chapter 13 payments are figured

The very debts that the author warns may not be wiped out in bankruptcy are the debts that are paid first from any money flowing through the bankruptcy estate.  The priorities for payment in bankruptcy see that secured debt, recent taxes, and support are paid before the run of the mill unsecured creditor.

Student loans, the bane of many struggling Americans, are the exception.  They aren’t generally dischargeable in bankruptcy, but they don’t have a priority for payment.  Bankruptcy for a student loan borrower may only wipe out other debts, making it easier to pay off student loans.

What does it cost to stay in debt

The Fool is quick to point out that filing bankruptcy costs money.  That in fact is the first of the downsides of bankruptcy that the author highlights.

There’s no mention of the cost, both monetary and emotionally, of remaining in debt.

While the author notes that bankruptcy appears on your credit report for years and is visible to potential employers and landlords, absent is any evaluation of how a credit report full of delinquent, or even just overwhelming debt, impacts those same parties.

Negative information about a debt  can be reported for seven years.  Not so different than bankruptcy.

Your balance sheet matters

When assessing your financial health, your credit score is secondary.  First of all, look at your balance sheet, not your ability to borrow more money in the short run.

Look at the demands on your income, your age, and your prospects when picking a get-out-of-debt strategy.

Understand that your credit heals with time, and a bankruptcy on your record is not a bar to getting new credit.  A recent bankruptcy affects the price you pay for a loan;  a bankruptcy years ago fades in significance.

And that’s why, for many people, I love the fresh start provided by bankruptcy.

More

What Kenny Rogers tells us about getting out of debt

What bankruptcy should cost

Credit heals

Why I love Chapter 13

Life after bankruptcy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Who Owns Your Business When You File Bankruptcy?

By

business bankruptcy

The bankruptcy trustee’s question was straightforward (if inartful) yet the business owner nearly blew the answer.

The trustee asked:  are you the sole owner of your business?

When my client hesitated, she followed up:  are you a sole proprietor?

Focusing on the fact that he was the only person with an interest in the business, he said yes.

Wait a minute, was my response. That’s not so.

It took several minutes of sworn testimony at the first meeting of creditors to sort the matter out.

Who owns the corporate business

We were once again experiencing the phenomenon of the shape-shifting business owner.  The businessman had, in his mind, morphed into a sole proprietor rather than a stockholder.

The debtor was the sole owner of the corporation that owned and operated the failed business.

He was correct that no one else had an interest.  He skipped over the part that it was another legal entity, his corporation, that actually owned the assets and owed the debts of the business.

He owned the corporation that owned the business.

Why it matters

A sole proprietor owns a business as a personal asset.  In law, he owns the assets of the business and is liable for its debts.

A sole proprietorship has no legal existence separate from the owner.  The proprietorship may adopt a fictitious business name, but behind that dba is the individual who owns and operates the business.

So, if my client were a sole proprietor, the inventory of the business would have been an asset of the bankruptcy estate created when he filed bankruptcy.  The business bank accounts would fall to the control of the trustee.

When a corporation is created, it becomes a legal entity distinct from the individuals who own the shares in the corporation.  The corporation can have its own debts and its own funds that don’t belong directly to the shareholders.

That’s why business people incorporate:  to create a legal “person” that can take risks without exposing the shareholder’s other assets to that risk.

When my client filed his Chapter 7 case, his stock in the corporation was an asset of the bankruptcy estate, but not the business itself.  The business was owned and operated by the corporation.

Since the corporation had tons of debts, the stock that the bankruptcy trustee could administer had no net value.  That’s because, equity holders get money when a corporation liquidates only after creditors of the corporation have been paid off.

The takeaway

The first meeting of creditors in a bankruptcy case is the trustee’s opportunity to gather more information about what the debtor owns and owes.

Once you focus on what the trustee needs to get from the meeting, it’s easier to answer correctly and avoid the confusion that happened in my case.

When confusion ensues, it’s important to sort it out on the spot.

And that’s how I earned my keep in this case.

More

Rules for testifying at a bankruptcy hearing

How corporate officers can avoid personal liability

When a business needs to wind down

We’re Now In Redwood City

By

Moran Law GroupMoran Law Group has packed up and moved to Redwood City!

Effective October 1, 2018, Cathy and Renee are holding forth at 643 Bair Island Road, Suite 403, Redwood City.  Our phone number and email addresses are the same.

We’re sharing our office with two good friends and marvelous bankruptcy lawyers, Jeff Curl and Wayne Silver.  Rubbing shoulders with these guys sharpens our legal thinking and just generally enlivens our days.

We will continue to counsel consumers and small businesses about their financial challenges and provide candid advice on whether bankruptcy is appropriate.

We are focused on insisting that creditors honor the fresh start that a bankruptcy discharge should bring with it.  That means we are ready to go to court if necessary to make creditors obey the law and make you whole for the cost of the exercise.  We can help you enforce your rights even if we didn’t represent you in your bankruptcy case.

We also tackle mortgage servicing issues that arise after a Chapter 13.  All too often, it seems that lenders can’t keep track of the money they’ve collected, nor can they follow the law on being transparent about what they do.

 

What You Need To Know About Reaffirmation

By

bankruptcy reaffirmation

Decisions, decisions.

Your bankruptcy filing requires that you state your intentions about reaffirmation right up front.

Translated, that means what are you going to do about the car after bankruptcy.  The car on which you still owe money and need to get to work.

In the midst of all the other information needed to file a Chapter 7, it’s hard to get your head around reaffirmation.

Particularly since reaffirmation got a lot more complicated and unpredictable thanks to Congress and bankruptcy “reform” in 2005.

With my apologies for being dull and dense, here’s my attempt at explaining the issues and the options when deciding whether to reaffirm a car loan.

Liens not discharged

The entire reaffirmation issue comes up because the bankruptcy discharge wipes out your personal liability for your car loan.  But the lender’s lien on the car survives bankruptcy.

After your Chapter 7 is over, the car lender can’t sue you for the unpaid balance of the car loan, but it can repo the car to enforce its lien.

As bankruptcy lawyers say, the lien “rides through” the bankruptcy.

If you keep paying

Before 2005, a provision of the Bankruptcy Code said that if you kept payments current on a loan after filing, you were not in default.

Put another way, just filing bankruptcy and discharging your personal liability didn’t breach the contract for the car loan as long as you paid as agreed.

That provision was wiped out in bankruptcy “reform”.  Now, even if you are current on the car loan payments, just having filed bankruptcy puts you in default.  You are now at risk of having your car repossessed.

You can eliminate the risk of repossession by reaffirming the car loan.

Effect of reaffirmation

If you “reaffirm” the original loan deal, your bankruptcy is no longer a breach of the contract.  You give up the benefits of your bankruptcy discharge as to the car loan.  So, the car lender emerges from your bankruptcy in the same position that it was when you filed.

You, however, are once again at risk of not only repossession of the car, but also a lawsuit for any deficiency if you can’t pay in the future.

The greater the spread  between what you owe on the car and what it’s worth, the greater the risk to your pocketbook in the future.

What the car lenders got from Congress

The car finance industry was one of the big winners when Congress amended the Bankruptcy Code.  They got the right to intimidate debtors with the loss of their wheels if they didn’t give up the benefits of bankruptcy as to this one creditor.

And the fear factor of losing your car, even if you’re paying, is huge.

As it has played out since 2005, most car lenders have elected not to automatically repossess cars when the loan isn’t reaffirmed.  They decided that they’d rather have the stream of income that post bankruptcy payments provide than get the used car worth less than the loan balance.

Ford Motors is the exception.  Ford has aggressively repoed cars where the debtor didn’t reaffirm the debt.

Reaffirmation is voluntary

You get a choice about reaffirming a car loan.  You don’t have to reaffirm.

In fact, the form that you file with your bankruptcy papers allows you to elect to surrender the car.

Surrender may be the best thing if the car is simply too expensive or isn’t reliable.

You can choose to keep the car and continue paying without reaffirming.  You take your chances that the lender will repossess the car, but you also keep the benefits of the bankruptcy discharge.

Getting reaff approved

Because reaffirmation presents risks, the required form for reaffirming lays out the value of the collateral, the amount owed on the loan, and the interest rate.  The facts get laid out in black and white.

A form I reviewed recently made clear that while the debt to be reaffirmed was $22,000, the value of the car involved was only $11,000.  You had to ask whether it was a good deal to pay $22,000 for something worth half of that.

Sometimes, the lender will reduce the interest rate or extend the payments as part of the reaffirmation.

The form also calls for the debtor to lay out his income and his other expenses.  The question is:  can the debtor really afford to keep paying on the car.

Often, there isn’t enough income to pay the expected costs of living and pay the car.  The form contains no way to express the fact that some living expenses are essential, and get paid even if other expenses are deferred.

Because the issue is so fraught with risks and uncertainties, the reaffirmation agreement has to be approved by the bankruptcy judge.

The judge is tasked with assessing whether the debtor understands the risks, and can pay the reaffirmed loan without hardship.

And the question the law doesn’t address is what can the debtor do if he loses the car.

In my experience, lawyers hate having to advise clients about their “options” when the options are so unappealing.  Judges, too,  hate trying to predict the debtor’s future, with or without the car.

Does ride-through survive?

Out of this cauldron of uncertain and bad options, a line of court decisions has developed that may provide a middle course.

Some courts have held that a debtor who attempts to reaffirm a car loan and has the judge deny approval is still protected from repossession.

Those courts read the law to say that all that is required to preserve the right to “keep and pay” is the willingness to reaffirm.  So, even if the judge withholds approval of the reaff, the lender can’t repossess as long as the payments are kept current.

In my view, all of this is enough to end our love affair with cars.  But there are your choices.

More

Tax liens after bankruptcy

What a bankruptcy judge actually does

To Do list for after your discharge

 

 

 

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories