Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box

Silicon Valley Horror Story: The Business Credit Card That Bit

By

I’ve long said that there is no credit card for which a real, live human being isn’t liable.

(That may be an exaggeration, but not by much.)

And I’ve long worried about the prospects for success of business startups financed on credit cards.

But I’ve never seen a departing employee of a start up stuck with the bill for charges made by management after he left, until now.

He thought the card (and the balance owed) belonged to the business and he left it behind when he took a new job.

Eighty thousand dollars in charges later, he found he was on the hook as far as the card issuer was concerned.

It was a Silicon Valley horror story.

So, let’s review how this happened and what to learn from it.  Because this won’t be the last time that departing employees have gone out on a financial limb for a new venture that fails.

Who’s liable for the business card

While the card issuer may be willing to emboss the business name on the card along with yours, dollars to doughnuts, YOU are the only one legally liable to pay the bill.

Unless the card application calls for the signature of an officer of the business entity, the bank is extending credit to an individual who signs the application.

How a corporation signs its name

The business name on the plastic may make you look more “professional” or make it easier to sort business from personal expenses, but the legal liability lies with the named individual.

How management got free money

In a world of on line purchasing, possession of the card was probably sufficient to let the remaining employee charge more stuff.  When was the last time a signature was required for online use?

Maybe, the remaining employee genuinely thought the card was business property.

Or maybe not, given the nature of the purchases.

But my client left the card behind, without thought, until the collectors came calling.

Your exit strategy

Cutting ties to an employer should henceforth include cutting up the credit card.  Or more specifically, calling (and writing) the card issuer, closing the account.

Close the account, too, if the rupture is marital; don’t let more debt accrue

Closing the account doesn’t eliminate your liability for any outstanding balance, but it does prevent further use of the card.

And if the shoe is on the other foot, and you are the remaining employee and your company is actually liable on the account, close it when the named employee leaves.

 

 

 

 

The One Person You Must Tell About Your Bankruptcy

By

Spill the beans concept.Most people who file bankruptcy don’t want anyone else to know.

Some of my clients try to hide their break for financial freedom from friends and neighbors.

Others are worried about their boss finding out.

Occasionally, someone will try to keep it from their mate.

But trying to hide his bankruptcy nearly cost one client $103,000!

Because he hid his bankruptcy filing from his accountant.

It’s all about the tax

When my client got his bankruptcy discharge, stripping off the junior lien on his house, the mortgage lender dutifully sent him a form 1099.

The tax form correctly reported that $288,000 of debt had been forgiven in the last tax year.

And my client delivered the 1099 to his tax preparer, who in turn said,

That will be an extra $103,000 in tax, due and payable on April 15th.

Only, once the tax preparer got the news about the bankruptcy filing, it wasn’t so.

Debt forgiven in bankruptcy isn’t taxable

A discharge in bankruptcy is the first exception to the standard tax rule that debt that is forgiven is treated as if it were cash income.

When the discharge occurs by reason of a  bankruptcy case, the discharged debt is not taxable income.

Responsibility for connecting the dots on discharged debt falls to the debtor/taxpayer.  The creditor whose debt has become worthless is obligated only to report to the IRS that the debt has been forgiven, as a matter of law.

The 5 most common errors banks make on 1099’s

The creditor generates a 1099 form, without comment on the circumstances.

The taxpayer is charged with filing the form that says, in IRS speak, “yes, but….”

Yes, the debt was discharged;  but, no, the discharge didn’t increase my taxable income.

The “because” is the discharge in bankruptcy.

Accountant needs to know about discharge

Had my client told his tax preparer upfront about the bankruptcy, he could have avoided several hours of intense stress.

Retired and living with family, he probably doesn’t have $103,000 in net worth, much less that kind of money sitting around for Uncle Sam.

I’m an advocate for openness about bankruptcy.  It’s not shameful nor the mark of failure.

If everyone who had filed bankruptcy admitted it, those who are now struggling with the decision to file wouldn’t feel like they are the only ones  who ever chose bankruptcy rather than perpetual debt.

But regardless of whether you’re willing to share with others the fact you’ve filed bankruptcy and gotten a fresh start or not, share the facts with your CPA.

It will save you money.

More

Who profits when bankruptcy is source of shame

Tax deductions hidden in Chapter 13

Easy steps to maximize your bankruptcy discharge

Image © Fotolia 

The Flat Wrong 1099

By

credit-squeeze-transparentWhen her soon-to-be-ex filed bankruptcy, my client got a 1099-C for the joint credit card.

The form claimed that the debt was cancelled.

Therefore, she had additional income equal to the card balance.

Only, none of the statements on the 1099 were true.

The debt wasn’t discharged as to the non filing spouse.  One spouse’s discharge does not discharge the personal liability of anyone else.

Further, the liability of the soon-to-be-ex wasn’t even discharged yet since it was the beginning of a 3 year Chapter 13.

The discharge doesn’t come until all the plan payments are made.

What to do?

Cancelled debt and taxes

Tax law requires the holder of a debt that is forgiven to report the forgiveness to the IRS.

The forgiveness can be voluntary, as in, we compromised the debt and now you owe less.

Or, it can be by operation of law:  you filed bankruptcy and discharged the debt.

Either way, the tax man sees the amount of money that you no longer owe as if it were cash income.

And, if it’s income, then you owe tax on the income.

No tax in bankruptcy

If my client was the spouse who had filed bankruptcy, she would properly have gotten a 1099-C, at the end of the case.  When the debt was truly gone.

But she wouldn’t have owed tax on the discharged debt, because bankruptcy is an exception to the rule.

Debt forgiven in any chapter of bankruptcy does not trigger cancellation of debt income.  Therefore, no tax.

Tax treatment of cancelled debt is one of the sterling features of bankruptcy that make it superior to debt settlement.

Attacking the erroneous 1099

Strike first, is my thought, when the 1099 is wrong.

The credit card company issued the defective 1099. Write the issuer and request an amended 1099.

The deadline for sending out 1099’s is about six weeks earlier than the deadline for submitting the 1099’s to the IRS.

Jump on the problem right away and attempt to correct the situation before it gets to the IRS.

When the IRS gets bad information

If you couldn’t head off a submission to the IRS that was wrong, tackle the problem in your tax return.

You can’t just file the return as if the IRS didn’t think you had this  extra “income”.  You have to address the error and overcome it.

The IRS has a form for claiming an exception to the cancellation of debt income rule:  Form 982.

Attach your explanation of why the 1099 is wrong to the 982.  There isn’t a box, or an “other” category on the form where you can provide further information, so you’ll have to attach your explanation to the form.

If not resolved at the issuer level, my client will have to point out that she hasn’t been relieved of the debt, since she hasn’t filed the bankruptcy AND that her spouse hasn’t yet been relieved of the debt yet either, as there is no discharge.

Wash, rinse and repeat

I’ve spoken as though the IRS was the sole taxing authority involved.

If you live in a state with an income tax, you must repeat the drill described for the IRS with your state tax agency.

Personal liability required

Probably the most common error in issuing 1099’s is the matter of personal liability.  If the debt cancelled was non-recourse, the borrower had no personal liability in the first place.

Cancellation of a non recourse debt doesn’t alter the borrower’s balance sheet.  The borrower wasn’t personally liable before cancellation, so there’s no cancellation of debt income to address.  More on the fictional 1099.

As I said, see above and wash, rinse and repeat.

More on tax

Discharging taxes in bankruptcy

Tax liens after bankruptcy

When tax debt is a life sentence

 

The Truth About Tax Liens After Bankruptcy

By

liens after bankruptcyWe have a lien on your name.  Not your property, your name.

That’s what the county tax collector told my client, years after he got his bankruptcy discharge.

And that multi-thousand dollar lien claim threatened to sink the refinance of his house.

Eventually, we got the county straightened out without going back to bankruptcy court, and the lien claim withdrawn, but only after educating the county on liens and bankruptcy.

Here’s what was wrong with the county’s claim they had a lien on my client’s name.

Liens attach to assets

The initial nonsensical claim is that a lien attaches to someone’s name.

A name isn’t property.  You can’t enforce a lien against a person’s name by seizing the name and selling  it.  That’s what a creditor would do with a valid lien that attaches to an asset.

Yet the tax collector claimed the lien was against the name of my client. Not a lien against his home, but a lien that entitled them to payment from a real estate refinance.  (Not logical, but this was a tax collector.)

Perhaps the tax collector was trying to say that the lien wasn’t one for real property taxes on that particular house.  Or she was saying that it wasn’t a consensual lien where the homeowner pledged his house as collateral for a loan.

But she definitely contended that the lien on my client’s name survived his bankruptcy.

Liens don’t snag post bankruptcy assets

The second bit of nonsense was the claim that the county had a lien in the house my client acquired after he filed bankruptcy.

The law on liens and a bankruptcy discharge is straightforward:

  • Liens that attach to an asset owned on the day you file bankruptcy survive the discharge
  • If the debt supported by the lien is not discharged, the lien attaches to property acquired after bankruptcy
  • If the debt is discharged, there’s no lien on newly acquired stuff.

It’s the last proposition that saved the day for this client.  The county’s tax claim was discharged in the bankruptcy.  My client didn’t own a house when he filed.  Therefore, the county got no lien on after-acquired property on account of a debt that was discharged.

Preventing post bankruptcy surprises

It’s not uncommon for creditors to pop up after bankruptcy with a claim inconsistent with the bankruptcy discharge. It happens because of ignorance, incompetence, and, occasionally, sheer greed.

Bankruptcy courts stand ready to enforce the rights that debtors get from bankruptcy.  But that takes time.

When a judgment lien pops up after bankruptcy

The trouble comes when the creditor stands to upset a real estate transaction that has a deadline, and possible costs associated with missing that deadline.  Like my client trying to refinance his house. Interest rates are going up.  Miss the deadline and pay a higher rate for the life of the loan.

If real estate is involved, start immediately to see what liens show in the public record. In California, where I practice, that means get a preliminary title report at the first opportunity.

Identify any liens that are unenforceable by reason of the bankruptcy discharge, or by reason of having been paid, died of old age or avoided in bankruptcy.

My attack on the county tax collector started with providing the creditor mailing list from the case, showing that the county had notice of the bankruptcy.  I sent them a copy of the discharge order and the schedule that showed that my client didn’t own the house when he filed years ago.

Having given the county good notice of the bankruptcy, way back when, my client avoided more than $10,000 in tax claims.

And his name was his own.

More

Dealing with tax liens in bankruptcy

When creditors ignore your discharge

The IRS after your bankruptcy case

 

 

Divorce And The Ticking Debt Bomb

By

dynamite-1293082_1280_opt

Debts of the marriage often outlive the marriage itself.

And, those left-over debts are nothing but trouble.

But too often, divorcing couples don’t mop up the joint debts they held during the marriage, only to have the situation blows up years later when one ex-spouse hits financial trouble.

Here’s a true story that illustrates the danger.

Joint account remained open after divorce

When the client arrived in my office

  • divorce has been final for decades.
  • no balance on joint line of credit when the spouses divorced
  • no one closed the account

When my client hit a rough patch, she accessed the left-over line of credit, big time.  But it wasn’t enough to avoid the need for bankruptcy.

As a result, my client’s financial mess threatens to slop over to the former spouse who remained liable on the dormant line of credit, because no one paid attention to the debts at the time of the divorce.

Even though the new balance on the line of credit arose long after the divorce, the ex spouse remains liable to the lender because his name is on the account.

Chapter 7 doesn’t discharge debts to spouses

My client can discharge the debt to the lender in her bankruptcy, but not the debt to the long-since ex spouse.  That’s because obligations between spouses, such as the division of debt, can’t be discharged in Chapter 7

Unpaid support in bankruptcy

I see a couple of possible outcomes in my case:

The indemnification clause in the divorce agreement will require my client to make the ex whole.

The other spouse’s reported efforts to close the account will serve to insulate him from the debt.

In the face of the bankruptcy, the lender will not pursue the uninvolved ex.

Deal with debts of marriage up front

It’s early days on this particular episode.  But the broader lesson is clear:  clean up all joint financial matters during the divorce.

Every joint obligation left for untangling later is a ticking time bomb.  Leaving a refinance, a property transfer, or a joint account for “later” exposes one ex spouse to the debts and financial travails of the other.

Former spouses got a big bump in their protections from consequences of bankruptcy filings by their ex’s in the bankruptcy “reform” act of 2005.  Now, no debt created by a divorce is dischargeable in a  Chapter 7.

So the obligations created by an agreement to indemnify or hold harmless the other spouse from debts will survive Chapter 7.

But the value of that indemnification right may be questionable if the person required to protect the other former spouse has just gone through bankruptcy.  If the protected spouse has to pay the lender, the only remedy is to sue the ex, who just went through bankruptcy.

So, clean up the debt situation in the divorce, just as thoroughly as you divide the assets.

More on bankruptcy and divorce

When your STBX files bankruptcy

Image courtesy of Fort Meade.

Why Your Mortgage Lender Won’t Send Statements After Bankruptcy

By

Don't gag mortgage servicersLists of stupid laws are lots of fun, when they don’t really touch your life.

But the law that gags mortgage lenders after bankruptcy isn’t funny.

Preventing lenders from sending mortgage statements to homeowners after bankruptcy just sets families up for foreclosure and rewards servicers with the fees that follow default.

It’s just a stupid result that no one has fixed.

Bankruptcy laws collide

Two clients this week weren’t laughing when two different bankruptcy laws collided:

One law says that the lender’s lien on your home remains enforceable after bankruptcy.

The second law prohibits efforts to collect a debt after bankruptcy.

The survival of the lien after bankruptcy protects the secured lender;  the injunction against post bankruptcy collection protects the debtor.

But what if the debtor wants, and needs, to continuing paying?  The intersection of these two provisions thwarts both. [Read more…]

Hidden Dangers In Tapping The Reverse Mortgage Piggybank

By


broken piggybank-images of moneyActor Fred Thompson used to appear on my Sunday morning news program every week touting the benefits of a “government insured”,  safe, reverse mortgage.

Get the money you deserve to live the good life, he urged.

I’m watching the aftermath of that sales pitch play out for one of my clients, and it’s not “the good life” I’m watching.

In fact, the foreclosure sale on the home is scheduled for next week.

Intentions thwarted

The borrower, a single woman of many decades,  took out the reverse mortgage and drew down on the loan.

She has passed away, leaving the house to my client.

The house may have as much as $300,000 in equity over and above the reverse mortgage.

But because the borrower has passed away, the lender won’t take payments from anyone else.  The loan is due and full, says the lien holder, and that’s that.

The climate for a refinance of the property in the hands of my client isn’t auspicious, so the house, and all that equity, may go, not to the relative of choice, but to the “friendly”, reverse mortgage lender.

Bankruptcy possible

A bankruptcy filing may solve this particular problem.  We’ll see.

Bankruptcy is an option only because the heir to the house is an individual.  Individuals can file bankruptcy.  Trusts and estates cannot.

If the elderly borrower had left the house to her estate, the automatic stay that comes with a bankruptcy filing, would not be available to the probate estate.  The probate estate isn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief.

House as piggybank

The risks of reverse mortgages are becoming more apparent, summarized in this Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report to Congress.

A surviving spouse who is not on the loan may have no right to stay in the home on the borrower’s death.   The loan is complex and may encourage premature tapping of home equity.

In the bigger picture, the pressure to tap home equity to support retirement is the predicable result of regarding your home as your piggybank or your retirement nest egg.

The only way to take advantage of that nest egg is to either sell the house or to borrow against it.  By retirement age, most homeowners aren’t great candidates for a conventional loan contemplating monthly payments.

And as we’ve seen in the Great Recession, you can’t count on a robust real estate market when you need that equity for retirement.

So, the gap in the retirement safety net is created, and in steps Fred Thompson and the company he shills for.

As the sergeant on Hill Street Blues said every shift:  Hey, let’s be careful out there.

 Image courtesy of Flickr and Images of Money

 

IRS Shakedown Happening In Bankruptcy Court

By

The latest IRS scam is happening in bankruptcy, out in the open.

Now usually when I write about IRS scams, I’m talking about genuine bad guys either pretending to be the IRS to hijack your money or pretending to be you to the IRS, to hijack your money.

But nobody is pretending in the trick I first saw last week.  The IRS is simply trying to collect the Affordable Care Act penalty twice.

What the IRS did

My client filed Chapter 13, owing income taxes.  The most recent of those taxes must be paid in full to get a Chapter 13 discharge.  So, the amount that must be paid is critical to the success of the plan.

The IRS filed a proof of claim for the unpaid income taxes.

But then, weeks later, the IRS amended their claim to add an “excise tax”, for the penalty under the Affordable Care Act, for not having health insurance.

The IRS conveniently “overlooked” the fact that the filed tax return already included the penalty on line 61 of the 1040.

So, they wanted to get paid twice by putting a benign label, “excise tax”, on the form, and hoping that you didn’t dig deeper.

No right to double payment

The tax law for the years in question, 2015 and 2016, imposed a penalty for not having insurance, to be collected by the IRS.

The IRS form includes a line where you add the penalty to your taxes if you didn’t have appropriate insurance.  So when my client filed his return, he’d already added the penalty to what he owed.

And the IRS dutifully used his return to claim payment for the unpaid amount.

OK.

But it’s not OK to double dip and add a duplicate penalty with another name.

When I challenged the IRS agent who filed the claim, his response suggests that he’d not looked at the client’s tax return;  he’d just added the penalty to the claim by rote.

Conversations with fellow bankruptcy specialist William Brownstein suggests the IRS confusion runs more broadly on this issue.  He reports the IRS assessing non-bankrupt tax payers with penalties for not including form 1095-B with their returns, even though the form itself says “don’t file with your return”.

So, the first step is to eliminate the duplicate claim.

But there’s more.

Is the ACA penalty entitled to priority payment

Recent taxes are given a priority for payment under the Bankruptcy Code.  If the ACA penalty is a “tax” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, it must be paid in full in Chapter 13.

But, is this exaction a tax?

A Louisiana bankruptcy court recently said no in a case called Chesteen.  It’s not a tax, it’s a penalty.  And as a penalty, it isn’t entitled to payment in full, and as a penalty, it is dischargeable at the completion of the plan.  Great work by NACBA member Rachel Thyre Anderson, who reports that the decision has been appealed.

Where do we stand on ACA penalty

While the issue of whether the penalty is a tax or not may not yet be settled by the Chesteen decision, it is clear that the IRS, at best, only gets to collect the penalty once.

If the penalty is properly included on the tax return as filed, then any additional “excise tax” that claims priority status should be challenged.

How Avoiding Probate Ended Up In Bankruptcy

By

Do it Yourself law

Do it yourself seems so industrious and self reliant.

And we’ve been bombarded with books, speeches and courses on the evils of probate.

So, I guess it should be no surprise when people try DIY  schemes to both avoid probate and avoid lawyers who create probate-avoiding trusts.

Yet they forget an unavoidable truth:  the transfer of bank accounts or title to property intended to facilitate the care of the elderly or  enable the fee-free passage of property to the next generation can end up involving all parties in a bankruptcy lawsuit.

While the goals are admirable and understandable, the consequences can be horrific when a bankruptcy filing comes along.

Avoid probate and court disaster

Frank Pipitone tells a gut wrenching story of a DIY bankruptcy involving a DIY will substitute that will likely cost the elder her home.

An elderly woman adds her adult children to title of her paid-for home.  The children think that their interest in the home is a formality; it remains the mother’s home, they think. [Read more…]

Loan Modification: The $100,000 Mistake

By

 

loan payoff

 

The job of a mortgage servicer is to collect loan payments and keep track of what’s owed on the mortgage.  That shouldn’t be too hard.

But the evidence is that they don’t do that basic job very well.

Throw a loan modification into the mix, and who knows what you’ll get.

Accounting for modification

I got a glimpse of what we face when my client requested a loan payoff in connection with a sale.

The loan had been modified some five years ago, with the result that a sizable hunk of the amount due when the loan was modified was due only upon sale.

Asked for a payoff, the servicer returned a payoff that failed to include some $127,000 of non interest bearing principal.

Granted, this particular mistake cut in favor of my client.  Who are we to complain?

But it is just as easy to image that the blunder works the other way:  the requested payoff doesn’t take into account the changes made to the debt when the loan was modified downward.  The payoff demand could just as easily have been calculated at the old, higher rates in effect before modification.

Multiply this instance by a fraction of the modified loans out there, and we need to tell Houston we have a problem.

Mortgage modifications to the rescue

Mortgage modifications were supposed to save both individual homeowners and the economy as a whole.

They promised to keep homeowners in their homes despite the housing crash of the Great Recession.

To some extent that has worked.

Or at least mortgage modifications spread the failures out over time so that the market wasn’t glutted with foreclosed properties.

But anyone who has attempted a mortgage modification knows first hand the frustration of submitting an application to the servicer.

Over and over, the servicer claims that you haven’t sent the documents, or the documents are stale or incomplete.

That inability to account for the modificiation application documents is, I’m afraid, just a sneak-peak at the next mortgage horror:

Servicers have no records about the loans they did modify.

Or, more precisely, the records they have are not to be trusted.

Rotten record keeping

The casualness with which servicers approached modifications has scared me for sometime.

  • modification agreements were poorly drafted
  • borrowers never got copies signed by the lender
  • changes in terms not part of public record

Mortgage accounting departmentThe quality of the customer interface at the servicer was laughable, if it wasn’t frightening.

The problems are compounded when the servicing on loans changes hands.

The new servicer starts with the ending balances from the prior servicer.  Few records other than an electronic data base change hands.  Any mistakes made by the prior servicer are now impenetrable.

The terms, or maybe even the enforceability of the modification itself, are lost in the mists of time.

Practice self defense

Who knew that homeownership was going to be a contact sport?

But you have to assume, if you got a loan modification, it will be up to you to defend the modification when the time comes to pay it off.

Here’s the homeowner’s two step:

  1. Keep good records– find and preserve the loan modification agreement.  Treat it as being just as important as the deed to your home.
  2. Request mortgage accounting each year –  make an annual request for the state of your loan, and preserve the response

Your goal is to have your own records supporting the terms of the loan modification and to catch any problems in accounting early.

May all the lender’s mistakes cut in your favor, and may the Force be with you.

You’ll need all the help you can get.

Nightmare image: 

Monkey at typewriter:  Oliver Hammond

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories