car loan Archives - Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

At Risk of Repossession? How To Keep The Car & Pay Less

If you are one of the 7 million Americans living in fear that your car will be repossessed, consider how Chapter 13 bankruptcy can save your wheels.

Losing your car can accelerate a torrent of nasty financial consequences.

No car, no way to work.

No work, no income.

So, what can a Chapter 13 bankruptcy do to put you back on the road?

Stop repossession

All chapters of bankruptcy impose an injunction on creditor efforts to collect debts, or enforce liens, automatically when you file. That automatic stay applies whether or not the creditor knows about it.

So, file bankruptcy and any collection actions taken without court permission are void and legally ineffective. If they pick up your car after you’ve filed, you can compel its return.

The only exception to the stay applying automatically is if you’ve had two bankruptcy cases dismissed in the past 12 months. More on multiple dismissals.

Spread out car payments

Chapter 13 allows you to put forward a plan to restructure your car loan. The remaining payoff balance on your car loan can be spread over 60 months.

Unless your car loan is very new, or the original term very long, that probably lowers what you pay each month through the plan.

Reduce interest rate

You can adjust the interest rate on a car loan paid through the plan to the current day, market rate. As I write, that interest rate in California is between 4 and 5%.

This power to lower the interest rate is central to a successful readjustment of a high interest car loan. It’s of little help if your loan is less that today’s market rate.

But Chapter 13 in the states of the 9th Circuit has another trick up its sleeve.

Strip out loan add ons

Part of a Chapter 13 plan can be cutting the car loan down to the portion of the loan that financed the car itself; you can knock out any part of the loan that paid off an underwater trade-in, or a service contract, or gap insurance.

The 9th Circuit said in Penrod that these additions to the amount financed were not protected by the 2005 bankruptcy amendments that gave special consideration to car lenders.

So, you can pare down the car loan that has to be repaid to just the amount of the loan balance used to buy the car itself, and not all the extras.

Deal with other debts

You don’t just file bankruptcy on one debt; bankruptcy includes all your debts.

Some may be absolutely dischargeable, perhaps without paying anything on them.

Some liens can be wiped out. Back payments on home loans can be caught up in Chapter 13.

Chances are that there’s more going on in your financial life than just the trouble with your car loan.

An experienced bankruptcy lawyer can help you look at the big picture and propose a solution to keep you trucking.

Your car in Chapter 7 bankruptcy

Is bankruptcy the right choice for you

Interviewing a bankruptcy lawyer

How Chapter 13 Cuts Car Loan Down To Size

By Cathy Moran

Car lenders who make new car loans with an underwater trade-in will face the music in Chapter 13.

The Supreme Court declined to review a 9th Circuit decision that stripped car loans of their protected specially protected status in bankruptcy; as a result, Californians will continue to benefit from the debtor-friendly decision in Penrod, rising out of a San Francisco bankruptcy case.

The question in Penrod

At issue was whether the prohibition on cramming down the debt on a vehicle purchased within 910 days of a bankruptcy filing protected “negative equity” financed in the car purchase.

“Negative equity” is the debt in excess of the trade in’s value. That left-over debt is added to the total of the new car loan and is unrelated to the value of the purchased vehicle.

And BAPCPA, the bankruptcy “reform” act of 2005 prohibited reducing a secured claim on a vehicle purchased within 910 days of the bankruptcy. But did it similarly protect that part of the loan that wasn’t really related to the cost of the vehicle purchased?

Penrod facts

In Penrod, the Redwood City resident had traded in a car worth $6,000 on which she owed $13,000. The new car loan included $7000 necessary to pay off the debt on the trade in.

The legal issue is whether that left over debt should enjoy the projections extended car sellers in BAPCPA for purchase money loans on the debtor’s car.

Every other circuit that addressed the question has given purchase money protection to the entire debt including the negative equity portion of the new loan.

The 9th Circuit held the negative equity was not purchase money as to the current car. The appeals court remanded the case for the bankruptcy court to figure out how to apportion the payments made before bankruptcy between the purchase money element and the leftover debt element.

It’s surprising to me that SCOTUS didn’t accept cert on Penrod, since there is clearly a split among the circuits and it seems to this California bankruptcy lawyer that the Supremes take great pleasure in overturning the 9th Circuit.

But I’ll take a victory however it presents itself and await a decision on how to calculate what can be trimmed from a debtor’s car loan in bankruptcy.

How Chapter 13 thwarts repossession

Keeping your car after Chapter 7

10 ways bankruptcy makes you better off

Image Snackariah under a Creative Commons license

You've arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said "try").

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions on how I think law should work for the consumer and small businesses when it comes to debt.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area