• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About Us

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • Newsworthy
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

What happened to encouraging Chapter 13

By Cathy Moran

Used to be, bankruptcy law was organized to encourage debtors to file Chapter 13 and repay some part of their debts. Some part of that encouragement came in the form of the Super Discharge: the ability to discharge debts incurred by bad acts; unfiled tax debt from long past tax years; and unfiled claims in the bankruptcy case. Most of that departed with BAPCPA.

I’ve adapted Chapter 13 became more like the alternative dumping ground if the means test closed off Chapter 7. Often, the differing allowable deductions on B-22C meant the debtor foreclosed from 7 made minimal payments in 13.

But what galls me these days is the impact of the 9th Circuit BAP decisions of Smith and Martinez which disallow deductions for debt contractually due in the upcoming 60 months on liens to be stripped in the Chapter 13 and for property to be surrendered. The result is that Chapter 7 becomes more attractive because there, the prevailing case law hews close to the statutory language that allows means test deduction for debts due over the life of a Chapter 13 plan. What a blow to the sponsors of BAPCPA who were intent on forcing more debtors into Chapter 13 repayment plans. (This has to be the only time I’ve mourned the thwarting of the intentions of the BAPCPA proponents. Remember the line from the Grinch Who Stole Christmas that the Grinch’s heart was just so many sizes too small)

Very soon after BAPCPA was effective, I argued the Pak case to the BAP concerning whether the statutory look back period in B-22 was conclusive when the debtor’s future income was not only different but larger. I argued that the law was to be applied the way it was written: that Congress, in its infinite wisdom (and I tried not to giggle) thought it could write a formula to find the “can pay” debtors and that it intended to cut off judicial discretion to assess the allowance of expenses or the income to be available to fund the plan. I lost and came away after oral argument with the sense that the judges on the panel wanted the old days back, when their judgment and good sense were the last word. That was a perfectly fine world, but not the world after enactment of BAPCPA.? (Kagenveama from the 9th Circuit some months later vindicated the argument I made unsuccessfully to the BAP.)

With Smith and Martinez, I again sense that the BAP is chafing at the idiocy found in BAPCPA.  I chafe too, but I don’t want to see a legal atmosphere where the words of the statute can be ignored if the judges see a way to “get” a debtor or to return to a world where their judgment is valued. I treasure predictability, and if BAPCPA gets applied as written(mean though it is), then I’ll figure out how to get my clients the best deal available under the law. If however we have courts finding interpretations that carry them back to preBAPCPA days, then I feel like the Light Brigade: ” canon to the right of them, canon to the left of them…” hoping I can ride boldly and well, into the mouth of hell,…

In the mean time, I’m filing more Chapter 7’s.

More from the Soapbox

  • Does Filing Bankruptcy Ruin My Credit For 7 YearsDoes Filing Bankruptcy Ruin My Credit For 7 Years
  • No Discharge Chapter 13 Effective To Strip LienNo Discharge Chapter 13 Effective To Strip Lien
  • Staying Out Of Bankruptcy Trustee’s CrosshairsStaying Out Of Bankruptcy Trustee’s Crosshairs
  • Why Creditors Should Get Less in Chapter 13Why Creditors Should Get Less in Chapter 13
  • Changing view of when to file bankruptcyChanging view of when to file bankruptcy

Filed Under: Considering Bankruptcy, Pondering

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

About The Soapbox

You've arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said "try").

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions on how I think law should work for the consumer and small businesses when it comes to debt.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

Bankruptcy Discharge vs. Dismissal

Dismissed and discharged. In a bankruptcy case, these two terms are at the opposite ends of the scale of results in bankruptcy. Yet they are often confused. A discharge is a win!  The bankruptcy discharge order wipes out your personal legal liability to pay a debt. A dismissal is usually a loss.  It means … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700

Categories

All content copyright © Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.