• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About
  • TOC

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

Be Prepared When You File Bankruptcy Without Your Spouse

By Cathy Moran

The bankruptcy trustee’s question to the debtor was jarring:  “why didn’t your spouse file bankruptcy with you?”

For starters, it was the only “why” question in an entire calendar of debtor hearings.

Every other question began, “what”, or “do you have”, questions about assets and financial history.

This question asked for the motivation of another person, who isn’t here, and isn’t under oath.

As the debtor’s attorney, I stifled my inclination to say “what difference does WHY make”.  (Actually my first thought was much pithier than that, and probably not appropriate for an attorney to say in public).

So, let’s look at the single spouse filing, and guess “why” the trustee asked that question.

Spouses can file bankruptcy alone

It’s absolutely uncontroverted that both spouses don’t have to join in  bankruptcy filing.

Pro’s and con’s of filing without your spouse

The real deviation from the normal here is that a married couple can file a bankruptcy case together.  § 302.  

Just as importantly, spouses don’t have to file together.

Community property comes into bankruptcy

In a community property state like California, all of a married couple’s community property comes into the bankruptcy estate, even when only one spouse files.

That’s because all of the community property is liable for the debts of each spouse.  Outside of bankruptcy, husband’s creditors can reach all of the community property to pay his debts.

That doesn’t change in bankruptcy.

So, as a matter of law, the trustee’s question makes little sense:  regardless of the “why” the absent spouse didn’t file, the creditors still get access to the entirety of the community property.

Community property is poorly understood

The trustee may have tried, inartfully, to see if the debtor testifying before her understood community property.

Many Californians think, incorrectly, that buying an asset and putting it in one spouse’s name defeats the community property presumption.  That presumption says: all property acquired during marriage is presumed to be community property.

And that presumption carries the day, regardless of which spouse’s name appears on the title.

The community property presumption can be overcome by following the rules of transmutation.

So, a legitimate trustee question might be: does your spouse have any property that you haven’t listed in your bankruptcy schedules.  That might be a way to flush out whether there are assets missing from the schedules because the debtor thought the form of title prevailed over the community property presumption.

But asking “why” someone else acted a certain way is not a direct approach to the issue.

Some snark involved

In preparing clients for the first meeting of creditors, conducted by the trustee, I’ve offered clients a couple of possible responses to the “why” question.

Some of the possibilities include:

  • You’d have to ask him
  • Advice of counsel
  • Concern about future credit
  • Aversion to bankruptcy
  • No need of discharge

But whatever your response, your answer to “why” doesn’t undermine your right to file alone.

More

How the discharge of one spouse benefits the other

Bankruptcy and divorce: a volatile combination

More from the Soapbox

  • Bankruptcy Questions Have Few Quick AnswersBankruptcy Questions Have Few Quick Answers
  • SBA Loans Collectible Long Past Business FailureSBA Loans Collectible Long Past Business Failure
  • When Is The Time Right To File BankruptcyWhen Is The Time Right To File Bankruptcy
  • Considering Going Out Of Business?Considering Going Out Of Business?
  • No More Lawsuits On Old Debt In CaliforniaNo More Lawsuits On Old Debt In California

Filed Under: Strictly California Tagged With: 2020

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

Bankruptcy Basics

About The Soapbox

You’ve arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said “try”).

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions. We dig deeper into how to consider bankruptcy and navigate a bankruptcy case.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

Cheat Sheet For Passing Bankruptcy Means Test

The bankruptcy means test has a fatal weakness in its attempt to keep people out of bankruptcy. Like so much recently, it's health care. It's health care, in the future, to be paid before your creditors get any money in your bankruptcy. It works because, in a logic that only Congress could employ, the means … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700
Phone: (650) 368-4700

Categories

All content copyright © Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.