• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About
  • TOC

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

How Will Bankruptcy Filers Retire?

By Cathy Moran

 

provide for retirement

Contributions to 401(k) retirement  plans during a Chapter 13 are not forbidden, as claimed by a colleague.

He paints with far too broad a brush.

A better reading of the Parks decision by the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is narrower:

The debtor cannot deduct from their income their on going contributions to a 401(k)  retirement plan for purposes of the infamous bankruptcy means test.

Retirement saving in 13

The Bankruptcy Code  section that describes contributions to 401(k) plan as being outside of the bankruptcy estate can’t be used to support the deduction of those on going contributions from income when calculating the means test .

And the means test drives what the debtor must pay to unsecured creditors, according to this new decision.

Congress didn’t explicitly OK continuing to provide for retirement in Chapter 13, so it must be forbidden, as a means test deduction, reasoned the judges.

Nowhere does it prohibit the debtor from saving.

It just makes it harder to do, by warping the means test  formula so that the claims of credit card issuers and holders of deficiency judgments come first in the debtor’s budget.

Do we believe in saving or not?

The bankruptcy system continues to reap the consequences of  poorly written amendments to the bankruptcy law in 2005.

The story goes that the new law was written by a lobbyist on the back of a cocktail napkin.  It certainly was rushed through Congress virtually without consideration.  Banks, car lenders, and those who were sure someone else was unfairly benefiting  by the then existing bankruptcy laws cheered.

At the same time that BAPCPA, the 2005 bankruptcy “reform”, created a universal exemption for a million dollars in IRA savings and protected repayment of 401(k) loans, it left unspecified its intentions about the debtor making continuing provision for retirement.

Which is it to be, folks?

The Parks decision exemplifies our ambivalence about retirement saving.  On the one hand, we are exhorted to make provision for retirement and reminded that Social Security was never intended to be a full blown retirement program.

Rather, it is a safety net that provides for some of what’s necessary to retire comfortably.

On the other hand, we see the court decisions that put the interests of the creditor body ahead of retirement.

Consumers are expected to save for retirement only what’s left after their creditors are provided for.  And if bad luck or bad judgment leaves them with more debts than they can pay, retirement savings come last in the allocation of funds.

Onward to old age

We need a clearer focus on the big picture:  retirement saving is just as much a reasonable and necessary budget item as food, housing and medical care in a bankruptcy budget.  Old age will come for us all, and longer life spans suggest we need to be saving more, not less.

To match this view, we need a new Congress as well,  to write a clear bankruptcy law that enables all individuals to make adequate provisions for their retirement.

That requires a Congresss  not bought and paid for by commercial interests who see only the short term advantage of putting the claims of creditors ahead of, rather than along side, the individual’s need to provide for retirement.

 Image courtesy of  FantasyClay

More from the Soapbox

  • How Chapter 13 Saves You MoneyHow Chapter 13 Saves You Money
  • 7 Principles of California Community Property7 Principles of California Community Property
  • Keep the house? Deflector shields upKeep the house? Deflector shields up
  • Smoke, Mirrors, And Budgets:  Are You Missing Where Your Money GoesSmoke, Mirrors, And Budgets: Are You Missing Where Your Money Goes
  • Incorporating A Troubled Business:  Work-around Or Worse?Incorporating A Troubled Business: Work-around Or Worse?

Filed Under: Featured

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

Bankruptcy Basics

About The Soapbox

You’ve arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said “try”).

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions. We dig deeper into how to consider bankruptcy and navigate a bankruptcy case.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

What Happens To Your Bank Account in Chapter 13

Those considering filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy worry about "what happens to my bank account?" Will the trustee take all the money? How do I pay my living expenses after I file? The short answer is: nothing changes. The account remains yours and available for all the expenses of day to day living. Because, … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700
Phone: (650) 368-4700

Categories

All content copyright © Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.