The automatic stay is the signature feature of American bankruptcy. Just by filing a bankruptcy case, your creditors are instantly prohibited by a federal court injunction from actions to collect a debt from you or your assets.
But, there’s a whole list of actions that aren’t included in the stay; we forget that some kinds of lawsuits with a financial aspect get excluded from the stay.
The automatic stay applies in all bankruptcy cases (unless you’ve filed more than two bankruptcy cases in the last year).
Instead of the usual rule, outside of bankruptcy, where you have to prove that you are entitled to an injunction, bankruptcy grants the injunction automatically, just for filing. The burden is on creditors to take action to extract themselves from the stay.
The list of exceptions is long and many of the excluded actions are very specific and technical. See 11 U.S.C. 362(b). But there are some biggies there too among the exceptions.
Here are the ones of most interest to the typical bankruptcy filer.
Family law issues
Actions to establish or modify support are not stayed. Neither are proceedings involving custody, marital status or paternity.
Support can be collected from property that isn’t “property of the estate” without violating bankruptcy law. And state issued licenses can be suspended for failure to pay support. That’s subsection (b)(2).
The stay doesn’t stop criminal prosecutions. Nor does it stop the enforcement of actions grounded in the public health and safety; that’s called the government regulatory exemption. More about that below.
Your state tax folks and the feds can legally demand the filing of a tax return; audit returns you’ve filed; and assess taxes they claim you owe.
Government can’t, however, record liens or levy assets to collect a tax you owed when you filed bankruptcy.
A landlord under a lease that expired according to its terms before the bankruptcy case was filed can proceed to get possession of non residential property.
Civil contempt sanctions
Collection of court-ordered sanctions for misconduct in litigation is not prohibited by the stay.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided that the public’s interest in making parties to a lawsuit play by the rules outweighed the sanctioned party’s interest in getting complete protection from collection action. The fact that the sanctions might be payable to the other party to the litigation didn’t change the state’s interest in enforcing its sanction for bad behavior in court. The case is Dingley.