• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About
  • TOC

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

Why Would Lawyer Choose Consumer Bankruptcy?

By Cathy Moran

cut finger_opt

I had my fees cut last week in a small Chapter 13 case.  The cut ($500) wasn’t large in absolute terms.

But the wound is deep and will continue to bleed into my attitude about what I do as a professional.

To borrow a phrase from my kids, I feel profoundly disrespected.

The case, filed by another lawyer, had been targeted for dismissal.  It had lingered unconfirmed for many, many months and the initial attorney was leaving bankruptcy practice.

Unlike many bankruptcy lawyers, I’m willing to come into a case mid stream and try to salvage a bad situation.  I hate to see clients take a hit traceable to poor representation.

In this case, I subbed in, found some mistakes that, once corrected, allowed confirmation, and sought to be paid for the work.

The result in the case, I thought, was stellar.

Not so fast

The judge’s issue with my fee application was the relative size of fees incurred to prepare a separate, customized fee application, draft a notice, and appear at a hearing 15 miles from my office requiring travel during rush hour.

The court has a “guideline” that the preparation of the fee application should cost no more than 5% of the fees sought.  That works if the fees are $10,000 or more.  The rule was probably crafted with Chapter 11 reorganization cases in mind.

When the fees are a couple of thousand dollars, 5% becomes an impossibly small number relative to the tasks required.

And that’s the bitch here:  the Bankruptcy Code requires a written fee application, detailing the services provided, including contemporaneous time records, and an actual hearing, whether or not there is an objection.

So, the work is mandated and the compensation is capped.

And the cap doesn’t fit small consumer cases.

This happens  yet in a world where the Bankruptcy Code of 1978 sought to compensate bankruptcy professionals at market rates, comparable to other specialists.  The Code sought to move away from the “bankruptcy lawyers as second class professionals” thinking that prevailed before the Code.

It ain’t easy

It is my view that most judges sorely underestimate the challenges of representing debt-ridden consumers.  The people challenges are as great or greater than the legal challenges.

And, like this judge who acknowledged that the cut to my fees wasn’t fair, did it anyway.

Most bankruptcy judges were never self employed, never limited to eating only what they killed, metaphorically.  Most never represented a below median income, English as a second language debtor.  And fewer ever stepped into a floundering consumer case and made it work.

What goes around

If the bankruptcy bench shrugs off the impact on capable debtor’s lawyers of underpaying counsel, judges will find the bar in their courtrooms filled with the indifferent and the incompetent.

The wound to bankruptcy system will be self inflicted.

I cannot recommend this specialty to any lawyer who has to be self supporting.

More from the Soapbox

  • Ten Best Bankruptcy Gems In 2021Ten Best Bankruptcy Gems In 2021
  • Before You List Your Home For Sale: The Essential First TaskBefore You List Your Home For Sale: The Essential First Task
  • 10 Best Bankruptcy Soap Box Posts Of 201510 Best Bankruptcy Soap Box Posts Of 2015
  • The Foreclosure That Was Longer Than War & PeaceThe Foreclosure That Was Longer Than War & Peace
  • Bankruptcy Discharge vs. DismissalBankruptcy Discharge vs. Dismissal

Filed Under: Featured, You & your lawyer

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

Bankruptcy Basics

About The Soapbox

You’ve arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said “try”).

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions. We dig deeper into how to consider bankruptcy and navigate a bankruptcy case.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

Bankruptcy Alphabet: F is for First

In my Bankruptcy Alphabet, F is for First meeting of creditors. Lots of rumors exist about the that meeting; it produces unwarranted anxiety that is avoidable if you understand what's up. Let's check it out. The first meeting of creditors, also called the 341 meeting, is often the only time a debtor has to appear … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700
Phone: (650) 368-4700

Categories

All content copyright © Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.