• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About
  • TOC

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

Debt Buyer Gets Less Than It Bargained For

By Cathy Moran

no wayNo way, said the court.

A debt buyer who sued a foreclosed borrower, not for money owed, but for fraud in obtaining the loan, was slapped down  by a California appeals court.

Because the loan it bought was used to buy a home, California’s anti deficiency statute prevented the lender or the debt buyer from suing Ms. Monroy for the money yet owed on the note.

Instead, Heritage Pacific Financial, a Texas debt buyer, sued her for fraud it claimed she committed in the application to get the loan in the first place.

The narrow holding of the state appeals court is that when Heritage Pacific bought the loan, it didn’t buy the fraud claim.

The paperwork assigning the rights in a batch of bad loans it bought didn’t identify the fraud claim as part of what was sold.

Better yet, the court went on to uphold a token award against the debt buyer for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and $89,000 in attorneys fees to the borrower’s attorney.

I swear, it seems like one of the first and the few judicial decisions that push back against the perpetrators of the mortgage mess and their allies.

Or perhaps it’s just a push back against debt buyers scarfing up junior liens that were cut off when a senior lien foreclosed.

Let’s savor the victory, in any event.

The original loans

The fact pattern is familiar:  the borrower, Ms. Monroy, was a Spanish speaking housekeeper.  The decision didn’t say whether she could read or whether the loan documents were presented in Spanish, as required by California law.

The loan application fabricated a $9200 a month income for her as a business owner and contained uncontroverted misstatements about the purchase transaction.

She took out two loans from the same lender to buy a home in Richmond, California for $425,000 in 2006, toward the end of the mortgage lending frenzy.

By summer of 2008, the senior lien foreclosed and she lost the property. The junior lien was destroyed as a lien on the house by the foreclosure.  It was “cut off”.

Heritage Pacific bought the junior note from the original lender and proceeded to sue Ms. Monroy for fraud associated with the original loan transaction.

Their suit got them nothing, due to energetic legal representation of the borrower and a pair of courts that wouldn’t play along with the further exploitation of unsophisticated borrowers.

The path ahead

I suspect that Heritage_Pacific_v_Monroy is just the first of a spate of suits on cut off junior liens that will follow from the foreclosure epidemic we’ve experienced.

This decision is not published in the official reports of the California Court of Appeals.  Therefore, it can’t be cited in other cases as precedent.

But we can mine the successful arguments and the authorities that the court of appeals found decisive.

We can remember, as well, that the debt buyer’s threats to sue her for claims against her that had no merit resulted in an FDCPA damage award.

A review of  California law

If you suffered a foreclosure on California property, consider the following.

  • The typical, out of court foreclosure sale prevents the foreclosing creditor from suing you on the debt
  • A foreclosure sale destroys the lien of any creditor whose lien is junior to the foreclosing creditor
  • A lender who made a loan to enable you to buy a home you lived in cannot sue you for the debt
  • A creditor whose lien was destroyed by a foreclosure and whose loan was not used to buy the home still has an enforceable claim for money against you

We hope other courts will follow Monroy and we can add to the list:  an assignment of a promissory note does not transfer the lender’s fraud claims to the debt buyer.

 Image courtesy of Margnac and Flickr.

 

 

More from the Soapbox

  • Three Reasons To Divorce Your Bank Before BankruptcyThree Reasons To Divorce Your Bank Before Bankruptcy
  • Life After Bankruptcy: What’s It Really Like?Life After Bankruptcy: What’s It Really Like?
  • Incorrect credit reports can coerce payment of discharged debtIncorrect credit reports can coerce payment of discharged debt
  • The Means Test: Badly MangledThe Means Test: Badly Mangled
  • Get A Voodoo Discharge Without Filing BankruptcyGet A Voodoo Discharge Without Filing Bankruptcy

Filed Under: Real property & mortgages

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

Bankruptcy Basics

About The Soapbox

You’ve arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said “try”).

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions. We dig deeper into how to consider bankruptcy and navigate a bankruptcy case.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

What Happens To Your Bank Account in Chapter 13

Those considering filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy worry about "what happens to my bank account?" Will the trustee take all the money? How do I pay my living expenses after I file? The short answer is: nothing changes. The account remains yours and available for all the expenses of day to day living. Because, … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700
Phone: (650) 368-4700

Categories

All content copyright © Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.